|
|
View Poll Results: If no QB then who? | |||
LT Luke Joekel | 40 | 31.01% | |
DE Star Lotulelei | 30 | 23.26% | |
LB Jarvis Jones | 19 | 14.73% | |
Other (who, why?) | 40 | 31.01% | |
Voters: 129. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
02-09-2013, 06:26 AM | #1 |
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2013
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Who is gonna take them? The Jets are stuck with Sanchez for one more year because of his contract, the Eagles must draft OL if their offense wants to go anywhere, the Raiders are A) still scared from the Russell shitstorm and B) really need to improve their defense, the Bills might, the Jags might. And it doesn't matter whose behind center in Arizona if they don't have anyone who can block. And Bruce Arians knows that. The Browns literally just used a 1 on a QB, and everyone else is fairly set at the QB spot. I see at most 2 being taken in the first, but I seriously think that most teams will wait. We might have to jump up to 28-31 to get our guy if the Jags pass at 1.2, but I don't think we'll need to. But that's apparantly just me
|
Posts: 19
|
02-09-2013, 06:33 AM | #2 |
Training Camp Hero
Join Date: Oct 2006
Casino cash: $8504801
|
What a stupid thing to say. They have multiple players returning from injury including a top 5 LT. And even so, just because you have a weakness doesn't mean you must take a player to cover it, you have several rounds and free agency to address it! So they should pick a guard that high? there is no way they take a LT, so what else do you suggest they do to improve their line? You DO NOT take guards or centers that high in the draft. That is just ****ing madness.
|
Posts: 5,996
|
|
|