Chiefs Per Schefter: Chiefs tag Houston - Page 7

aturnis · 03-02-2015, 08:40 AM

More to come...

ShowtimeSBMVP · 03-02-2015, 10:35 AM

Justin Houston situation is about to get very interesting

Posted by Mike Florio on March 2, 2015, 11:24 AM EST
Kansas City Chiefs v Jacksonville Jaguars
Getty Images
The Chiefs finally did what has been expected for months — they’ve applied the franchise tag to linebacker Justin Houston. And as explained over the weekend (when most of you weren’t devoting non-work time to non-work reading of the Internet), it’s much closer to the start of the process than the end of it.

The Chiefs opted for the non-exclusive version of the tag. On one hand, it’s cheaper than the exclusive level of the tag. On the other hand, it allows another team to sign Houston to an offer sheet that, if not matched by the Chiefs, would result in Houston changing hands for a pair of first-round picks.

Per a league source, Houston intends to aggressively pursue an offer sheet from another team, targeting teams that would be giving up a low first-round pick in 2015 and, most likely, a low first-round pick in 2016. Houston also intends to continue to pursue an offer sheet after the draft, when the compensation necessarily will become a first-round pick in 2016 and 2017.

Houston, we’re told, is seriously considering staying away from the Chiefs until the Week 10 deadline for signing the franchise tender. If nothing materializes by then, Houston would sign the tender, finish the season, and hit the market in 2016 — unless the Chiefs plan to tender him again, at a 20-percent raise over the 2015 franchise tender.

That’s a stark change from Houston’s in-season plan to sign the tender right away, gladly accepting the life-transforming $13 million or so for one year of play. That 22-sack season may have been a factor in Houston’s change of plans.

Finally, Houston will consult with the NFLPA to explore the possibility of filing a grievance seeking the defensive end franchise tender, which will be higher than the linebacker tender. Seven years ago, Ravens and Terrell Suggs engaged in a similar fight, with the two sides agreeing to essentially split the difference. For Houston, it could be a bit more challenging because he actually does play a considerable amount of linebacker, dropping into coverage in some passing situations.

Which makes him more versatile, makes his 22 sacks more impressive, and potentially makes him a lot more attractive to a team with a desperate coach and/or G.M. who may not be around to use the future draft picks that would be sacrificed to get Houston now.

Chief Roundup · 03-02-2015, 10:36 AM

One other thing before everyone goes all in on blaming Dorsey, Houston was the last player to sign during his rookie year and wanted more regardless of slotting.
Houston and his agent are going to be hard to negotiate with, they have been that way since he stepped into the league. Pioli and crew had a hard time with Houston as well, for those that liked Pioli contract stuff better.

**notorious** · 03-02-2015, 10:38 AM

He doesn't want to be here.

Get the picks and move on.

**The Franchise** · 03-02-2015, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan

Justin Houston situation is about to get very interesting

Posted by Mike Florio on March 2, 2015, 11:24 AM EST
Kansas City Chiefs v Jacksonville Jaguars
Getty Images
The Chiefs finally did what has been expected for months — they’ve applied the franchise tag to linebacker Justin Houston. And as explained over the weekend (when most of you weren’t devoting non-work time to non-work reading of the Internet), it’s much closer to the start of the process than the end of it.

The Chiefs opted for the non-exclusive version of the tag. On one hand, it’s cheaper than the exclusive level of the tag. On the other hand, it allows another team to sign Houston to an offer sheet that, if not matched by the Chiefs, would result in Houston changing hands for a pair of first-round picks.

Per a league source, Houston intends to aggressively pursue an offer sheet from another team, targeting teams that would be giving up a low first-round pick in 2015 and, most likely, a low first-round pick in 2016. Houston also intends to continue to pursue an offer sheet after the draft, when the compensation necessarily will become a first-round pick in 2016 and 2017.

Houston, we’re told, is seriously considering staying away from the Chiefs until the Week 10 deadline for signing the franchise tender. If nothing materializes by then, Houston would sign the tender, finish the season, and hit the market in 2016 — unless the Chiefs plan to tender him again, at a 20-percent raise over the 2015 franchise tender.

That’s a stark change from Houston’s in-season plan to sign the tender right away, gladly accepting the life-transforming $13 million or so for one year of play. That 22-sack season may have been a factor in Houston’s change of plans.

Finally, Houston will consult with the NFLPA to explore the possibility of filing a grievance seeking the defensive end franchise tender, which will be higher than the linebacker tender. Seven years ago, Ravens and Terrell Suggs engaged in a similar fight, with the two sides agreeing to essentially split the difference. For Houston, it could be a bit more challenging because he actually does play a considerable amount of linebacker, dropping into coverage in some passing situations.

Which makes him more versatile, makes his 22 sacks more impressive, and potentially makes him a lot more attractive to a team with a desperate coach and/or G.M. who may not be around to use the future draft picks that would be sacrificed to get Houston now.

****. Don't make me hate you Houston.

**wazu** · 03-02-2015, 10:40 AM

Wonder how long it will take for Elway to get the deal done.

**notorious** · 03-02-2015, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant

****. Don't make me hate you Houston.

Look at it from his viewpoint.

Would you take more money to play in a nicer city in better weather?

**notorious** · 03-02-2015, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu

Wonder how long it will take for Elway to get the deal done.

He is working on Hali right now just to remind us of Neil Smith and Keith Traylor.

**The Franchise** · 03-02-2015, 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious

Look at it from his viewpoint.

Would you take more money to play in a nicer city in better weather?

Oh I get it. Still doesn't make me any less annoyed.

**Meatloaf** · 03-02-2015, 10:44 AM

Pretty clear that Houston wants $$$ and doesn't care where it comes from. Hey, that's his prerogative; can't blame him for that. However, it does suggest that his desire/dedication to play for the good old KC Chiefs isn't particularly high.

As I said before, a couple of #1 draft picks certainly isn't horrible. I'd be happy to take those and let someone else mess with Houston and his agent.

-King- · 03-02-2015, 10:45 AM

Would be hilarious if Houston signed the tender in the next few days or during preseason like he's going to do most likely.

**BossChief** · 03-02-2015, 10:45 AM

Why the **** would they use the non exclusive tag on him?

That's a sign of disrespect imo

O.city · 03-02-2015, 10:46 AM

He's gone. Someone will offer two 1st rounders.

oh well, thank god for baseball

-King- · 03-02-2015, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meatloaf

Pretty clear that Houston wants $$$ and doesn't care where it comes from. Hey, that's his prerogative; can't blame him for that. However, it does suggest that his desire/dedication to play for the good old KC Chiefs isn't particularly high.

How is it clear? Chiefs literally put the tag on him 2 hours ago and people are already running around like chickens with their heads cut off. Why the overreaction?

**Rausch** · 03-02-2015, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meatloaf

Pretty clear that Houston wants $$$ and doesn't care where it comes from. Hey, that's his prerogative; can't blame him for that. However, it does suggest that his desire/dedication to play for the good old KC Chiefs isn't particularly high.

As I said before, a couple of #1 draft picks certainly isn't horrible. I'd be happy to take those and let someone else mess with Houston and his agent.

Or we could just pay him what he's worth...

**wazu** · 03-02-2015, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

Why the **** would they use the non exclusive tag on him?

That's a sign of disrespect imo

It's cheaper. It also could be to prove a point on market value, one way or another.

03-02-2015, 08:40 AM
aturnis MVP Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Iowa Casino cash: $9975811	Per Schefter: Chiefs tag Houston More to come...
Posts: 13,873

03-02-2015, 10:35 AM	#91
ShowtimeSBMVP Chiefs Join Date: Feb 2009 Casino cash: $3666009	Justin Houston situation is about to get very interesting Posted by Mike Florio on March 2, 2015, 11:24 AM EST Kansas City Chiefs v Jacksonville Jaguars Getty Images The Chiefs finally did what has been expected for months — they’ve applied the franchise tag to linebacker Justin Houston. And as explained over the weekend (when most of you weren’t devoting non-work time to non-work reading of the Internet), it’s much closer to the start of the process than the end of it. The Chiefs opted for the non-exclusive version of the tag. On one hand, it’s cheaper than the exclusive level of the tag. On the other hand, it allows another team to sign Houston to an offer sheet that, if not matched by the Chiefs, would result in Houston changing hands for a pair of first-round picks. Per a league source, Houston intends to aggressively pursue an offer sheet from another team, targeting teams that would be giving up a low first-round pick in 2015 and, most likely, a low first-round pick in 2016. Houston also intends to continue to pursue an offer sheet after the draft, when the compensation necessarily will become a first-round pick in 2016 and 2017. Houston, we’re told, is seriously considering staying away from the Chiefs until the Week 10 deadline for signing the franchise tender. If nothing materializes by then, Houston would sign the tender, finish the season, and hit the market in 2016 — unless the Chiefs plan to tender him again, at a 20-percent raise over the 2015 franchise tender. That’s a stark change from Houston’s in-season plan to sign the tender right away, gladly accepting the life-transforming $13 million or so for one year of play. That 22-sack season may have been a factor in Houston’s change of plans. Finally, Houston will consult with the NFLPA to explore the possibility of filing a grievance seeking the defensive end franchise tender, which will be higher than the linebacker tender. Seven years ago, Ravens and Terrell Suggs engaged in a similar fight, with the two sides agreeing to essentially split the difference. For Houston, it could be a bit more challenging because he actually does play a considerable amount of linebacker, dropping into coverage in some passing situations. Which makes him more versatile, makes his 22 sacks more impressive, and potentially makes him a lot more attractive to a team with a desperate coach and/or G.M. who may not be around to use the future draft picks that would be sacrificed to get Houston now.
Posts: 23,752

03-02-2015, 10:36 AM	#92
Chief Roundup Admitted Planet Junky Join Date: Oct 2000 Casino cash: $2071627	One other thing before everyone goes all in on blaming Dorsey, Houston was the last player to sign during his rookie year and wanted more regardless of slotting. Houston and his agent are going to be hard to negotiate with, they have been that way since he stepped into the league. Pioli and crew had a hard time with Houston as well, for those that liked Pioli contract stuff better. __________________ Fanaticism is nowhere. There is no tenderness or humanity in fanaticism.
Posts: 19,198

03-02-2015, 10:38 AM	#93
notorious Supporter Join Date: May 2005 Location: Who knows? Casino cash: $2935884	He doesn't want to be here. Get the picks and move on.
Posts: 83,361

03-02-2015, 10:40 AM	#95
wazu ... Join Date: May 2002 Location: Kansas City, MO Casino cash: $2212295 VARSITY	Wonder how long it will take for Elway to get the deal done.
Posts: 27,763

03-02-2015, 10:44 AM	#99
Meatloaf Supporter Join Date: Feb 2013 Casino cash: $4210359	Pretty clear that Houston wants $$$ and doesn't care where it comes from. Hey, that's his prerogative; can't blame him for that. However, it does suggest that his desire/dedication to play for the good old KC Chiefs isn't particularly high. As I said before, a couple of #1 draft picks certainly isn't horrible. I'd be happy to take those and let someone else mess with Houston and his agent.
Posts: 3,118

03-02-2015, 10:45 AM	#100
-King- ▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $2495743	Would be hilarious if Houston signed the tender in the next few days or during preseason like he's going to do most likely. __________________ 🏁
Posts: 63,876

03-02-2015, 10:45 AM	#101
BossChief SuperBowl or bust Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: BF Iowa Casino cash: $1884088	Why the **** would they use the non exclusive tag on him? That's a sign of disrespect imo
Posts: 47,126

03-02-2015, 10:46 AM	#102
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $2754064	He's gone. Someone will offer two 1st rounders. oh well, thank god for baseball
Posts: 81,236