Football The 49ers have expressed to others that a deal for QB Alex Smith is effectively DONE - Page 127

ShowtimeSBMVP · 02-24-2013, 04:56 PM

Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora

The 49ers have expressed to others that a deal for QB Alex Smith is effectively complete. Can't be finalized til league year begins 3/12

Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora

so it's not official, both clubs view it at as it's effectively done. I do not know the other team. KC and JAX are 2 teams that make sense

Marvin49 · 02-26-2013, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing

That's exactly what im talking about.

Andrew Luck went to another system and had success because......

*gasp* he's a talented player. Something Alex Smith is not. Smith is a game manager at best.

You could very well be correct. I'm just sayin' that it hasn't always been the case that a Harbaugh QB leaves him and falls flat.

Alex is better than you think tho...that game manager thing has been driving me nuts for years.

**The Franchise** · 02-26-2013, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marvin49

You could very well be correct. I'm just sayin' that it hasn't always been the case that a Harbaugh QB leaves him and falls flat.

Alex is better than you think tho...that game manager thing has been driving me nuts for years.

Alex is NOT better than anyone thinks. He hasn't done shit in the NFL for a ****ing reason.

BigCatDaddy · 02-26-2013, 11:08 AM

Someon whip out those Cassell /Smith career compairson again for our friend.

htismaqe · 02-26-2013, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

I'm not fanning the flames....but this shit pisses me the **** off.

So it's not a huge drop from a late 2nd round pick to an early 4th round pick?

Exactly. Our actual 3rd is like FORTY PICKS before that potential comp pick.

RyFo18 · 02-26-2013, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Other than the part in bold, this post is pretty much dead on.

Sure, some won't. But you and I both know the consensus opinion on this board, if say Geno <= Alex Smith, will be "Oh these idiots why did we draft a QB, there wasn't one, blah blah blah."

htismaqe · 02-26-2013, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marvin49

Yes...but that is THEIR problem. The important thing is that THEY PLAY WELL UNDER REID. Do you really care what they do when they leave?

Since when is a sub 1:1 TD/INT ratio considered "playing well"?

**The Franchise** · 02-26-2013, 11:10 AM

If the 49ers are ****ing smart.....then they'll trade Alex Smith and their 2nd or 3rd round pick to the Jets for Revis. Win-win for both teams.

ModSocks · 02-26-2013, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marvin49

Yes...but that is THEIR problem. The important thing is that THEY PLAY WELL UNDER REID. Do you really care what they do when they leave?

What I am saying is....If i want a Superbowl, then i need a QB that has talent + Reid.

Not a QB with NO talent + Reid. Sure, Alex Smith can probably game manage his way in Reid's system to 10 wins.....but their might be a rookie QB out there who can develop into something more that that.

Kinda like that Kaepernick kid, eh? (im not saying Geno is Kaepernick or anything)

htismaqe · 02-26-2013, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RyFo18

Sure, some won't. But you and I both know the consensus opinion on this board, if say Geno <= Alex Smith, will be "Oh these idiots why did we draft a QB, there wasn't one, blah blah blah."

You're wrong.

None of the Geno fans here are going to be pissed, in hindsight, if he busts.

NONE.

Marvin49 · 02-26-2013, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

****ing this.

And guess what? If we trade for Alex Smith.....he's getting a new OC. I wonder how that's going to turn out.

Thats a real concern....but at this point there is very little Alex hasn't seen. He's played under Mike McCarthy, Norv Turner and Mike Martz. He's seen in all.

Its not like he hasn't seen any of the WCO concepts he'll see under Reid (if rumors are true).

I'll put this another way....

...how many people thought the 49ers had enough talent LAST (2011) year to make a run at the SB? WHen Alex was resigned there was no end to the groaning by the bay. Nobody was talking about how "stacked" they were.

It took an actual coach to show how much talent was actually there.

I suspect the same might be true in KC. I know they certainly have some talent on O and have a pretty good line that could only get better by taking a LT.

What really has made the Niners so good are their lines. They took 3 O-Linemen in the first round.

If KC takes a LT to go with what they have...I really think that's how you build a winner.

**The Franchise** · 02-26-2013, 11:12 AM

But I have this funny feeling that this is what went down...

The only team to offer the 49ers anything was the Cardinals. The Chiefs were probably luke warm on the idea of trading for Alex Smith until the QBs worked out at the combine. The 49ers saw how Geno Smith worked out....and they leaked a story that the deal was done to drum up more interest so that the Cardinals would increase their offer or another team would jump into the mix.

**The Franchise** · 02-26-2013, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marvin49

If KC takes a LT to go with what they have...I really think that's how you build a winner.

Leave now and never come back. Anything you've said so far has now been nullified and is classified as reeruned. Go **** yourself.

Direckshun · 02-26-2013, 11:14 AM

Why on earth would leaking that a deal is done generate more interest?

Can somebody explain that to me?

O.city · 02-26-2013, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marvin49

Thats a real concern....but at this point there is very little Alex hasn't seen. He's played under Mike McCarthy, Norv Turner and Mike Martz. He's seen in all.

Its not like he hasn't seen any of the WCO concepts he'll see under Reid (if rumors are true).

I'll put this another way....

...how many people thought the 49ers had enough talent LAST (2011) year to make a run at the SB? WHen Alex was resigned there was no end to the groaning by the bay. Nobody was talking about how "stacked" they were.

It took an actual coach to show how much talent was actually there.

I suspect the same might be true in KC. I know they certainly have some talent on O and have a pretty good line that could only get better by taking a LT.

What really has made the Niners so good are their lines. They took 3 O-Linemen in the first round.

If KC takes a LT to go with what they have...I really think that's how you build a winner.

Or we could re sign the first round top 10 LT we have already.

**the Talking Can** · 02-26-2013, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marvin49

Thats a real concern....but at this point there is very little Alex hasn't seen. He's played under Mike McCarthy, Norv Turner and Mike Martz. He's seen in all.

Its not like he hasn't seen any of the WCO concepts he'll see under Reid (if rumors are true).

I'll put this another way....

...how many people thought the 49ers had enough talent LAST (2011) year to make a run at the SB? WHen Alex was resigned there was no end to the groaning by the bay. Nobody was talking about how "stacked" they were.

It took an actual coach to show how much talent was actually there.

I suspect the same might be true in KC. I know they certainly have some talent on O and have a pretty good line that could only get better by taking a LT.

What really has made the Niners so good are their lines. They took 3 O-Linemen in the first round.

If KC takes a LT to go with what they have...I really think that's how you build a winner.

are you real?

exactly how many LT's do we need?

****ing gross

02-24-2013, 04:56 PM
ShowtimeSBMVP Chiefs Join Date: Feb 2009 Casino cash: $3506009	The 49ers have expressed to others that a deal for QB Alex Smith is effectively DONE Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora The 49ers have expressed to others that a deal for QB Alex Smith is effectively complete. Can't be finalized til league year begins 3/12 Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora so it's not official, both clubs view it at as it's effectively done. I do not know the other team. KC and JAX are 2 teams that make sense
Posts: 23,755

02-26-2013, 11:08 AM	#1893
BigCatDaddy The Beast Inside Your Head Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Parts Unknown Casino cash: $1789122	Someon whip out those Cassell /Smith career compairson again for our friend.
Posts: 25,899

02-26-2013, 11:10 AM	#1897
The Franchise Most Valuable Villain Join Date: Dec 2006 Casino cash: $2875047	If the 49ers are ****ing smart.....then they'll trade Alex Smith and their 2nd or 3rd round pick to the Jets for Revis. Win-win for both teams.
Posts: 92,292

02-26-2013, 11:12 AM	#1901
The Franchise Most Valuable Villain Join Date: Dec 2006 Casino cash: $2875047	But I have this funny feeling that this is what went down... The only team to offer the 49ers anything was the Cardinals. The Chiefs were probably luke warm on the idea of trading for Alex Smith until the QBs worked out at the combine. The 49ers saw how Geno Smith worked out....and they leaked a story that the deal was done to drum up more interest so that the Cardinals would increase their offer or another team would jump into the mix.
Posts: 92,292

02-26-2013, 11:14 AM	#1903
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $4203447	Why on earth would leaking that a deal is done generate more interest? Can somebody explain that to me?
Posts: 59,314