*****Trade analysis superthread 2013*****

[AndChiefs]

Originally Posted by ChiefGator

I have an embarrassment of riches at the RB position (Charles, Spiller, Bush, and Miller in a 1/2 ppr) and only Greg Olsen as TE.

Would you consider this a good trade:

Greg Olsen + Lamar Miller for Witten (+ Fasano)?

I already offered to someone else:

Greg Olsen + Lamar Miller for Gronkowski (+ some scrub), which I don't expect to happen in preseason. Maybe once Lamar proves some people wrong and if Olsen has a good start to the season.

I'm really set at QB, WR, and RB, but want to improve my TE. Or is the non-sexy Greg Olsen better than any of those offers?

(Oh, we only start 2 RB's with an open-flex position which will be occupied by my 2nd QB)

I'd take that Witten deal in a heartbeat. Two RB's with a good backup in a PPR league should be plenty. You're looking at an extra 40-50 receptions from Witten over Olsen.

[Chiefshrink]

Originally Posted by AndChiefs

I'd take that Witten deal in a heartbeat. Two RB's with a good backup in a PPR league should be plenty. You're looking at an extra 40-50 receptions from Witten over Olsen.

AGREED. DO IT NOW !!!

Witten is Romo's BINKY at all times and rarely gets hurt. Hell he came back last year before he was actually ready and still produced. Tough as hell.