Movies and TV Avengers: Age of Ultron trailer leak - Page 7

-King- · 09:19 PM

Secondary link https://drive.google.com/file/d/0By4...0yVFlTSlU/view

JD10367 · 04-29-2015, 02:16 AM

Really enjoyed "Avengers 2". I think I liked it even better than the first one; much in the vein of "Empire Strikes Back" vs. "Star Wars", with the Universe already explained they spent less time talking at each other. Moved along well for the most part, held my interest even at 3 in the morning, furthered the story and prepared for the next film. Even more characters but yet everyone got their lines and their story. I don't agree with the complaints I've heard; the character evolution didn't feel forced, there wasn't too much drama and conflict, the Black Widow and Hulk thing didn't faze me, I didn't feel like they were just using this as a commercial for the next film, none of it. This thing had pretty much everyone in it you can think of (everyone had a couple of minutes of screen time), the jokes were typical for Marvel/Whedon... is it "Gone With The Wind"? No. But you're not gonna find a much better "shut your brain and enjoy superheroes" film.

And I do have to say... this film was MADE to be seen in IMAX 3D on a large screen. None of the 3D felt forced or sickening, and every scene had depth and energy to it that made me say, "Wow, that looks great in 3D". In 2D on a normal-sized screen I probably wouldn't have liked it as much.

And, once again, even pregnant, the star of this film (like the first film) is Scarlett's ass. Cobie Smulders is a close second.

ThaVirus · 04-30-2015, 01:10 AM

I thought it was pretty good. It had a shit ton of action. Like, ****ing balls, man. It seemed there was some huge showdown every six minutes or so.

Spoiler!

Anyway, cool movie. Can't say I was disappointed although it probably could have been better.

thabear04 · 04-30-2015, 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus

I thought it was pretty good. It had a shit ton of action. Like, ****ing balls, man. It seemed there was some huge showdown every six minutes or so.

Spoiler!

Anyway, cool movie. Can't say I was disappointed although it probably could have been better.

How you think the next Avenger movie will be since its part 1 and part 2.

ThaVirus · 04-30-2015, 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thabear04

How you think the next Avenger movie will be since its part 1 and part 2.

Are they making two more Avengers then? I hadn't heard..

Well, it's tough to say. For one: I'm not good at guessing shit like that and two: I don't know much about the Infinity Wars comics.

I'd imagine they'll need to show Thanos collecting the gems. I don't see them doing much of that in Cap's Civil War story line so I'd guess we'll see most of that in Ragnarok and/or part 1.

After that, it'll likely just be a race to take him down before he destroys the earth.

ThaVirus · 04-30-2015, 01:48 AM

Marvel's done a great job of making Stark and Banner the super think tanks they'd need to be to take down a guy like Thanos, but still.. Without Reed Richards, they may need more firepower. I'm guessing Doctor Strange and Black Panther could help out a bit on that end. Panther for the brains and tech and Strange just more for the strange.

ThaVirus · 04-30-2015, 01:48 AM

Ant Man as well. I totally forgot about that guy...

JD10367 · 04-30-2015, 04:59 AM

I do admit that the Hulk/Widow and Hawkeye story lines were the weak parts. But they're also necessary. I think the whole reason those two characters were put in the films in the first place is to stress the humanity that is needed, both on the team and as part of each superpowered superhero, to keep the team grounded. I think it was a conscious decision on Whedon's part to emphasize that without some humanity they're all just superpowered invincibles. And just on a realistic moviemaking level, if you don't give Jeremy Renner and Scarlett Johansson some dialogue and scenes they probably aren't going to do the film.

Jamie · 04-30-2015, 06:53 AM

The Banner/Natasha relationship is sort of the... I don't want to say fatal flaw, because I liked the movie, but it's definitely the movie's biggest problem. It's supposed to be the emotional throughline of the movie, but I didn't buy that the characters would be interested in each other, and didn't think the actors had much chemistry.

The Hawkeye stuff I liked on it's own terms, but I was still disappointed because I prefer the take on the character from the recent solo Hawkeye comic series.

thabear04 · 04-30-2015, 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus

Are they making two more Avengers then? I hadn't heard..

Well, it's tough to say. For one: I'm not good at guessing shit like that and two: I don't know much about the Infinity Wars comics.

I'd imagine they'll need to show Thanos collecting the gems. I don't see them doing much of that in Cap's Civil War story line so I'd guess we'll see most of that in Ragnarok and/or part 1.

After that, it'll likely just be a race to take him down before he destroys the earth.

Yeah but this one going to be called The Avengers Infinity War.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hea...ity-war-791964

**Rausch** · 04-30-2015, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamie

The Banner/Natasha relationship is sort of the... I don't want to say fatal flaw, because I liked the movie, but it's definitely the movie's biggest problem. It's supposed to be the emotional throughline of the movie, but I didn't buy that the characters would be interested in each other, and didn't think the actors had much chemistry.

I was optimistic about that because they have done a lot of interviews together and seem to get along well off screen.

*sigh* Oh well...

Deberg_1990 · 05-02-2015, 02:58 PM

Just saw it. Really enjoyed it

But......

They never explained how Stark got all his tech back after the end of Iron Man 3. That was odd?

Do the Avengers still think Coulson is dead? They never mentioned Coulson at all that I remember?

**007** · 05-02-2015, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990

Just saw it. Really enjoyed it

But......

They never explained how Stark got all his tech back after the end of Iron Man 3. That was odd?

Do the Avengers still think Coulson is dead? They never mentioned Coulson at all that I remember?

Well, I'm betting they find out soon. They tied it in with Agents again.

Deberg_1990 · 05-02-2015, 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru

Well, I'm betting they find out soon. They tied it in with Agents again.

Yea, I saw some of Whedons comments about Agents of Shield. I got the feeling he felt it was a 'necessary evil' and wasn't too thrilled about being tied into it.

Chiefspants · 05-02-2015, 03:39 PM

Well, I loved it.

The original Avengers had the distinction of being the first film that tied in multiple franchises on a scale that had never been attempted in that medium. However, overall I felt that there were some undeniable problems with the story and character development (at times it felt like they were making it up as they went along - especially at the climax). Don't get me wrong, I was a huge fan, but it certainly wasn't a masterpiece.

I felt the character development and the story in AOU were undeniably superior to the first Avengers. Honestly, I'm unsure what more anyone could have wanted from a movie of that scale. While some parts of the plot felt rushed, Whedon's announcement of a 3+ hour extended edition should solve many of those problems.

In58men · 05-02-2015, 06:04 PM

Just watched it. Awesome.

"Are you playing hide the zucchini"

10-22-2014, 07:32 PM
-King- ▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $2405743	Avengers: Age of Ultron trailer leak Secondary link https://drive.google.com/file/d/0By4...0yVFlTSlU/view Last edited by -King-; 10-23-2014 at 09:19 PM..
Posts: 63,894

04-29-2015, 02:16 AM	#91
JD10367 Cheaterlover* Join Date: May 2009 Location: RI Casino cash: $10010716	Really enjoyed "Avengers 2". I think I liked it even better than the first one; much in the vein of "Empire Strikes Back" vs. "Star Wars", with the Universe already explained they spent less time talking at each other. Moved along well for the most part, held my interest even at 3 in the morning, furthered the story and prepared for the next film. Even more characters but yet everyone got their lines and their story. I don't agree with the complaints I've heard; the character evolution didn't feel forced, there wasn't too much drama and conflict, the Black Widow and Hulk thing didn't faze me, I didn't feel like they were just using this as a commercial for the next film, none of it. This thing had pretty much everyone in it you can think of (everyone had a couple of minutes of screen time), the jokes were typical for Marvel/Whedon... is it "Gone With The Wind"? No. But you're not gonna find a much better "shut your brain and enjoy superheroes" film. And I do have to say... this film was MADE to be seen in IMAX 3D on a large screen. None of the 3D felt forced or sickening, and every scene had depth and energy to it that made me say, "Wow, that looks great in 3D". In 2D on a normal-sized screen I probably wouldn't have liked it as much. And, once again, even pregnant, the star of this film (like the first film) is Scarlett's ass. Cobie Smulders is a close second.
Posts: 12,916

04-30-2015, 01:10 AM	#92
ThaVirus 20 Menthol KOOLs Join Date: Sep 2007 Casino cash: $2002369	I thought it was pretty good. It had a shit ton of action. Like, **ing balls, man. It seemed there was some huge showdown every six minutes or so. Spoiler!** I didn't care much for the whole Hawkeye and his family bit or the romance between Romanov and Banner/Hulk. Ultron was cool but seemed even more emotional than the human characters. That threw me off a bit. It was nice seeing War Machine and Falcon. A short but pretty insignificant Heimdall appearance was also appreciated. The mention of Wakanda was nice. This is like the second time (outside of the million vibranium mentions) Wakanda and the Black Panther have been hinted at without actually seeing him. I'm ready for that movie. The Hulk vs Hulkbuster fight was great. I loved when Iron Man was machine gun punching Hulk telling him to go to sleep Anyway, cool movie. Can't say I was disappointed although it probably could have been better.
Posts: 44,316

04-30-2015, 01:48 AM	#95
ThaVirus 20 Menthol KOOLs Join Date: Sep 2007 Casino cash: $2002369	Marvel's done a great job of making Stark and Banner the super think tanks they'd need to be to take down a guy like Thanos, but still.. Without Reed Richards, they may need more firepower. I'm guessing Doctor Strange and Black Panther could help out a bit on that end. Panther for the brains and tech and Strange just more for the strange.
Posts: 44,316

04-30-2015, 01:48 AM	#96
ThaVirus 20 Menthol KOOLs Join Date: Sep 2007 Casino cash: $2002369	Ant Man as well. I totally forgot about that guy...
Posts: 44,316

04-30-2015, 04:59 AM	#97
JD10367 Cheaterlover* Join Date: May 2009 Location: RI Casino cash: $10010716	I do admit that the Hulk/Widow and Hawkeye story lines were the weak parts. But they're also necessary. I think the whole reason those two characters were put in the films in the first place is to stress the humanity that is needed, both on the team and as part of each superpowered superhero, to keep the team grounded. I think it was a conscious decision on Whedon's part to emphasize that without some humanity they're all just superpowered invincibles. And just on a realistic moviemaking level, if you don't give Jeremy Renner and Scarlett Johansson some dialogue and scenes they probably aren't going to do the film.
Posts: 12,916

04-30-2015, 06:53 AM	#98
Jamie Veteran Join Date: Mar 2002 Casino cash: $1418503	The Banner/Natasha relationship is sort of the... I don't want to say fatal flaw, because I liked the movie, but it's definitely the movie's biggest problem. It's supposed to be the emotional throughline of the movie, but I didn't buy that the characters would be interested in each other, and didn't think the actors had much chemistry. The Hawkeye stuff I liked on it's own terms, but I was still disappointed because I prefer the take on the character from the recent solo Hawkeye comic series.
Posts: 1,394

05-02-2015, 02:58 PM	#101
Deberg_1990 In Search of a Life Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: San Antonio Tx. Casino cash: $3914454	Just saw it. Really enjoyed it But...... They never explained how Stark got all his tech back after the end of Iron Man 3. That was odd? Do the Avengers still think Coulson is dead? They never mentioned Coulson at all that I remember? __________________ Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning: Matt once made a very nice play in Seattle where he spun away from a pass rusher and hit Bowe off his back foot for a first down. One of the best plays Matt has ever made.
Posts: 66,914

05-02-2015, 03:39 PM	#104
Chiefspants World's Best Boss Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Bronco Country Casino cash: $5654654	Well, I loved it. The original Avengers had the distinction of being the first film that tied in multiple franchises on a scale that had never been attempted in that medium. However, overall I felt that there were some undeniable problems with the story and character development (at times it felt like they were making it up as they went along - especially at the climax). Don't get me wrong, I was a huge fan, but it certainly wasn't a masterpiece. I felt the character development and the story in AOU were undeniably superior to the first Avengers. Honestly, I'm unsure what more anyone could have wanted from a movie of that scale. While some parts of the plot felt rushed, Whedon's announcement of a 3+ hour extended edition should solve many of those problems.
Posts: 18,353

05-02-2015, 06:04 PM	#105
In58men Baba Ganoush Join Date: Jan 2012 Casino cash: $2208026	Just watched it. Awesome. "Are you playing hide the zucchini" __________________ My Kansas City Chief record 9-9
Posts: 29,222