Scott Piolli's Top 10 Underclassmen

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by notorious

Is anyone surprised his top 5 contains 3 D linemen and a LT?


Thank God that cancer is gone.

It contains a RUNNING BACK.

Running backs are NEVER worth a top 10 pick. NEVER.

[B14ckmon]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

It contains a RUNNING BACK.

Running backs are NEVER worth a top 10 pick. NEVER.

Unless you are Cleveland.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by B14ckmon

Unless you are Cleveland.

There's a reason that they're in the conversation with the Chiefs as the worst team of the last 2 decades.

[B14ckmon]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

There's a reason that they're in the conversation with the Chiefs as the worst team of the last 2 decades.

Not disagreeing, just making a point.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by B14ckmon

Not disagreeing, just making a point.

Same here.

[ChiefMojo]

What do most suppose draft boards have Joeckel going? Who is to say Dorsey is any different than them or Pioli?

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo

What do most suppose draft boards have Joeckel going? Who is to say Dorsey is any different than them or *****?

What in his history suggests he's going to take a LT that high?

[keg in kc]

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo

What do most suppose draft boards have Joeckel going? Who is to say Dorsey is any different than them or *****?

Nobody in the media knows where anybody is on anybody's draft board at this point. And all the teams' draft boards will change in the next month anyway. Mockers right now are throwing out guesses, which is difficult because this is a year that doesn't have any obvious blue chip talent that stands out above the rest of the class. So they naturally migrate towards perceived 'safe' picks like o- and d-linemen. Although you're still seeing QBs near (or at) the top because that's the league's tendency in recent history. And let's face it, we have a (deserved) reputation as a conservative franchise that won't draft a quarterback.