Free Agency begins today, sort of.

[Coogs]

Teams can work out deals starting today, but deals can't be signed until Thursday at 4:00 PM Eastern Time. Teams also have to be under the top 51 Cap number at that same time Thursday.

[Nickhead]

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19

Word lately has been that Cleveland might take Trubisky #1. They love him.

Personally, I know he's the 'top guy', but I'm not a huge fan. Would take Mahomes or Watson as I believe their ceilings are higher. I trust that Reid would mold the offense to lead the QB to success no matter who it is though, as he always has.

ive read three different articles that watson could fall to the chiefs. not for or against. just think it's a stretch he falls that far. free agency aside, no way he lasts that long, but all the qb FA's could cause some to fall.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19

Word lately has been that Cleveland might take Trubisky #1. They love him.

Personally, I know he's the 'top guy', but I'm not a huge fan. Would take Mahomes or Watson as I believe their ceilings are higher. I trust that Reid would mold the offense to lead the QB to success no matter who it is though, as he always has.

Hope they're not planning on starting him 2017. I love Trubisky as a pro prospect, but I don't know many spread QBs with only 13 games started who would be able to recover from that huge learning curve. I mean, Ryan freakin Tannehill had more games under his belt in college as a QB than Trubisky.

If he's not in the right system with the right team, he could make Jared Goff look like Kurt Warner.

[pugsnotdrugs19]

Originally Posted by Nickhead

ive read three different articles that watson could fall to the chiefs. not for or against. just think it's a stretch he falls that far. free agency aside, no way he lasts that long, but all the qb FA's could cause some to fall.

If they want Watson, they will need to trade up once he slides out of the top 12-15. Very possible really.

But for all we know they may want Mahomes most, or maybe Kizer (I hope not). I can't wait for this draft to see where things are headed.

[Nickhead]

yeah, i don't watch college any longer. it's tough enough to keep up with the chiefs/jayhawks for me anymore. i miss the days when i watched enough to predict how good adrian, DJ, and Jamaal would become. and how much bradford was overvalued

[pugsnotdrugs19]

Originally Posted by RealSNR

Hope they're not planning on starting him 2017. I love Trubisky as a pro prospect, but I don't know many spread QBs with only 13 games started who would be able to recover from that huge learning curve. I mean, Ryan freakin Tannehill had more games under his belt in college as a QB than Trubisky.

If he's not in the right system with the right team, he could make Jared Goff look like Kurt Warner.

Yeah the truth is that it really doesn't matter how good of a prospect a QB is, if they aren't put in the right situation, they won't be successful. Andrew Luck should have been in the playoffs each of the last 2 years, but the team put around him made their whole product a mess.

Derek Carr would not be what we have seen so far if not for the respectable job that Oakland has done assembling his OL and WR corp. Mariota has been able to lean on his run game without any good WRs, Prescott the same (though he has Dez).

Now is the perfect time for the Chiefs to strike. They have a young ascending OL that will be together long term. Big time playmakers at WR and TE. They need to add some speed at RB and some depth at WR and TE. All around, it's a great spot for a young QB to step into.

[Nickhead]

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19

Yeah the truth is that it really doesn't matter how good of a prospect a QB is, if they aren't put in the right situation, they won't be successful. Andrew Luck should have been in the playoffs each of the last 2 years, but the team put around him made their whole product a mess.

Derek Carr would not be what we have seen so far if not for the respectable job that Oakland has done assembling his OL and WR corp. Mariota has been able to lean on his run game without any good WRs, Prescott the same (though he has Dez).

Now is the perfect time for the Chiefs to strike. They have a young ascending OL that will be together long term. Big time playmakers at WR and TE. They need to add some speed at RB and some depth at WR and TE. All around, it's a great spot for a young QB to step into.

the chiefs are actually in a good position to have a rookie qb should the starter go down. and here is where i make a browns reference. any quarterback in their newest existence would have failed miserably in cleveland.

[thabear04]

Jaguars expected to sign DE Calais Campbell
Tony Jefferson expected to sign with Baltimore Ravens
Woodhead expected to sign with Ravens
Jaguars expected to land safety Barry Church
Stills staying with the Fins

[pugsnotdrugs19]

Originally Posted by thabear04

Jaguars expected to sign DE Calais Campbell

This one was big. There was talk that he was considering Oakland. Would have been a nice addition.

[thabear04]

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19

This one was big. There was talk that he was considering Oakland. Would have been a nice addition.

Jags front line has some big boys Flowers,Jackson now him.

[Mile High Mania]

I'm still stunned at the notion that Mike Glennon might sign a contract worth $15M per year... holy hell.

[-King-]

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania

I'm still stunned at the notion that Mike Glennon might sign a contract worth $15M per year... holy hell.

This. I forgot he was actually still in the league.
Posted via Mobile Device

[Mile High Mania]

Originally Posted by -King-

This. I forgot he was actually still in the league.
Posted via Mobile Device

Actually started 13 games in 2013 (rookie), went 4-9. In 2014, he went 1-4... missed 2015 and threw it 11 times in 2016.

5 wins 13 losses - 4,100 yards - 30 TDs and 15 INTs
6 feet 7 inches tall...

And, rumored to be getting a deal for $15M a year on average.

Dunno what the appeal is, but this is why the Hoyers and McCowns play for 12 seasons and 13 different teams.

[chiefs1111]

Bears to sign Mike Glennon to three year deal worth 43.5 million

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...-million-deal/

[Mile High Mania]

Originally Posted by chiefs1111

Bears to sign Mike Glennon to three year deal worth 43.5 million

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...-million-deal/

Crazy.

[BossChief]

For Mike Glennon?

Wouldn't they rather have a guy like Nick Foles?

What am I missing here?