|
|
02-14-2013, 04:33 PM | #1 | |
Wearing ballistic dog goggles.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In the box.
Casino cash: $4871503
|
Quote:
__________________
Like "Cool Hand" Luke I'm busting rocks. __/|_/[___] |/ \\_| ---OllllO _( ))~-( ))-0--)) |
|
Posts: 25,298
|
02-14-2013, 06:01 PM | #2 |
Spiraling down the Drain
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Dante's Ninth Circle
Casino cash: $2240588
|
Corvette. As much as you can afford.
__________________
"We're both part of the same hypocrisy, Senator, but never think it applies to my family." "Fredo. You are my brother, and I love you. But never take sides against the Family again. Ever." 2019 Adopt a Chief - Travis Kelce #87 |
Posts: 31,763
|
02-14-2013, 06:24 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Olathe
Casino cash: $10003166
|
Here's where I make the call. In 20 years, what is going to be worth more? A C5/C6 base vette, or a Terminator?
The Terminator is like the crown jewel of the Mustang world, it embodies everything that is, was, and will be the pony car wars. Light, supercharged, 6 speed, IRS, the absolute fastest thing made at the time in that price range. You're talking about a car that could blow the doors off of a newer C6 Z06 with some breathing mods, and in much smaller production. The Terminator in 20-30 years is going to be what the "Fastback" is right now to collectors, but far more expensive due to production. As for the rest of the cars mentioned, the new GTO's should be a big pass. They are fat pigs. You won't do well on a track with them in a straight line or in the turns. It is a fun car, but it was not made to do well at any single purpose, other than daily drivability. It does do that pretty well. The Chargers should be passed on, they are all a complete abomination and a giant sign for people being swindled out of what COULD have been a great reboot. Instead they just wanted to cash in on people who couldn't afford the new camaro reboot or the new challenger reboot. As far as newer cars goes, it comes down to 2012+ Mustang 5.0 vs. New Camaro. If you add in older cars and consider all around practicality, the Terminator Cobra is the best of all possible worlds hands down, and if you want to be specific, get an 04 not an 03. However, if you have money to put into a car, I'd even suggest a Trans Am WS6 or a Firehawk. They just look so damned good and make a shit ton of Horsepower for next to nothing. I'm still going with a Terminator, and not because I own a Mustang |
Posts: 2,327
|
02-14-2013, 07:05 PM | #4 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Back in KC
Casino cash: $10007771
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 4,167
|
02-14-2013, 10:25 PM | #5 |
Someone pass the antifreeze
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Miami (North Cuba)
Casino cash: $1037819
|
My 4 door CTS-V disagrees.
|
Posts: 15,778
|
02-14-2013, 06:24 PM | #6 |
Mod Team
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Valley of the hot as ****
Casino cash: $1341900
|
Mustang 5.0 would be my choice for a car in this category and I want one after my next car but I have to be a little more practical first, lol.
|
Posts: 45,750
|
02-14-2013, 07:14 PM | #7 |
Mahomes Fanboi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Casino cash: $2614969
|
Do you want to stand out, or just get the same car everyone else has?
That's how I feel about Mustangs and Cameros. Sorry. *Ducks and hides* |
Posts: 19,495
|
02-14-2013, 07:17 PM | #8 |
Supporter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Casino cash: $3751956
|
I have had all kinds of cars. Big HP subarus, high strung NA 4 cylinders, mustangs, HUGE HP fbodys etc etc.
If your going to go with a newer muscle car, and not mod it, get a mustang. If you want to spend just a little money to go fast, forget the BS, buy a 2000ish f body roller and throw a stock 5.3 with an 88mm turbo at it. 9 second car. Done deal~ All that being said, my next car is going to be a super sick extrafast EVO~ |
Posts: 10,652
|
02-14-2013, 07:21 PM | #9 | |
Mahomes Fanboi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Casino cash: $2614969
|
Quote:
I miss my Saab too. Last edited by Molitoth; 02-14-2013 at 07:28 PM.. |
|
Posts: 19,495
|
02-14-2013, 07:33 PM | #10 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Casino cash: $3751956
|
Quote:
Fiance always liked the 440hp Subie I had, even over my faster/bigger Hp cars. I have learned my lesson with Subaru though, even with that 440 i was only an 11.9 car, and if I wanted to go faster I REALLY had to spend some extra money to build trans/block etc etc. While the EVO chassis starts out more expensive, they are cheaper to make go REAL fast and there are way more people who can work on them (nobody likes ****ing with that boxer motor) I liked my 10 second Trans Am too, dont get me wrong, but having an AWD 4 door is too convenient, especially if I can get back in the tens with a big ****ing turbo ~ edit; ahhhh the ol SAABaru. WRX in german clothing~ |
|
Posts: 10,652
|
02-14-2013, 07:36 PM | #11 | |
Mahomes Fanboi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Casino cash: $2614969
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 19,495
|
02-14-2013, 07:42 PM | #12 |
Supporter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Casino cash: $3751956
|
|
Posts: 10,652
|
02-14-2013, 09:15 PM | #13 |
Resident Glue Sniffer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Casino cash: $4689358
|
Excuse me while I masturbate to the sound of this motor/burnout.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=r...&v=rgDYAMIsc5Q Also pretty much the car to a T that I'd want.
__________________
Life is 99% inspiration, 1% Perspiration, and 1% Attention to Detial. RIP & Godspeed: Saccoppo Lonewolf Ed Fire Me Boy |
Posts: 37,381
|
02-14-2013, 09:20 PM | #14 |
MVP
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Iowa
Casino cash: $9975811
|
Challenger. Hands down. It's not close.
|
Posts: 13,873
|
02-14-2013, 09:21 PM | #15 |
Mod Team
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Valley of the hot as ****
Casino cash: $1341900
|
|
Posts: 45,750
|
|
|