Ron Parker coming back?

[ShowtimeSBMVP]

Ron Parker says in text message he plans to sign with Kansas City. @TerezPaylor

— Stephen Fastenau (@IPBG_Stephen) March 14, 2015

I can confirm the #Chiefs will sign Ron Parker. Agent Justin Turner tells me the deal is worth $30 million in total money over five years.

— Terez A. Paylor (@TerezPaylor) March 14, 2015

Ron Parker’s deal includes $8M guaranteed ($5M SB) and $5M in playing time incentives tied to playoff appearances and interceptions.

— Terez A. Paylor (@TerezPaylor) March 14, 2015

The deal for Ron Parker with the Chiefs is the largest ever for an un-drafted safety according to @NFLAgents_net

— Jason La Canfora (@JasonLaCanfora) March 14, 2015

[O.city]

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz

overpaying is always a big deal

if you get production, it's not

[Iconic]

I pray to god he's never put in a situation that requires he play corner.

[Rudy tossed tigger's salad]

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

grubbs is a 2 year deal, he can easily be cut in 2017

mauga is a backloaded deal, he got 2 mill guaranteed
fainaka is basically the same

none of these contracts will cause us any long term problems...i bet Parkers 'real' money looks nothing like 30 mill

Hamas is usually the one to point out things like this. I think he's just looking to bitch at Dorsey. Like Ayers would ever sign for 2 yr/6 million here. Please.

[RINGLEADER]

Originally Posted by Rausch

We'll come to regret this one...

If he plays like he did in 2014 (as safety and back-up CB) then I disagree. There's very little evidence that he will though.

Still think it is a good move if the deal doesn't kill us after the second year (saying this having not read the entire thread).

Our secondary is set now for 2015 though. Need to extend Sean Smith or draft his replacement.

[Jim Lahey]

"CLARK YOU CHEAP BASTARD!!!"

1 week later

"OMG QUIT SPENDING ALL OUR ****ING MONEY!!!"

[DaFace]

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0

the salary cap is a myth ... every year you just leverage towards the next year or the next two years ... rinse, wash, repeat

Clark is spending a lot of up front money and people are still mad. Go figure.

ChiefsPlanet in general is a pretty poor source of rational discussion these days, really. Most discussions are pretty much:

[Easy 6]

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0

Clark is spending a lot of up front money and people are still mad. Go figure.

Good point, from...

"That cheap bastard should be fired".

to

"Look at this idiot throwing his money around".

[bigjosh]

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz

5/6 million for 2 years is still too much!!

I sure as hell hope so but there will a number of guys who can do what Parker did for us in the 2nd-5th round of the draft for a fraction of that price.

What is the deal with Dorsey paying a bunch of money to Jags?

pay the impact guys, draft the jags for cheap

Im sure every gm wants to draft jags. They want to draft impact players.

Parker played just fine at safety.

If they keep him away from the corner this is a good signing

[Mr. Laz]

Originally Posted by O.city

if you get production, it's not

um ... yea, it is

that means you don't have as much money to pay other guys

I would hope we would upgrade parker and not even have him on the team

instead we pay him 5 million a year?

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Nah, he's just not a militantly ignorant goddamn whiner.

You have no idea, none whatsoever, how this contract is structured and you're still sitting here bleeding out.

Then again, you're just going to bitch regardless so I guess there's no harm in staking your position before you're aware of the substance.

You've gone full ****ing Clay. Bitching about $70 million in contracts to guys you know will see maybe 1/2 of that is just wailing for the sake of wailing.

Because I bitched so much about the signings of Maclin and Branch, and wept all over the trade for Grubbs.

Moreover, do you think that Hudson is going to see every cent of that 44.5 million? One set of contracts will see every cent, but the second won't? Everyone knows that no one sees the ass end of a non-rookie deal, but that's irrelevant when you are giving guys who would struggle to hold down a roster spot guaranteed money.

I'd put more credence in your response if it wasn't binaristic homerism wrapped in a facade of rationality. Christ, last week on here you were talking about how the 30 yards per game of Avant and his ability to get open deep (to the tune of 11 yards per reception) showed how Bowe (who hauled in passes for a higher YPC) was obsolete.

If I've turned into Clay then you've become Marcellus, Esquire.

[bigjosh]

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

did anyone really want us to give hudson 9mill a year?

Only morons.

[Urc Burry]

Originally Posted by ILChief

This says they don't plan on Berry coming back

At least for this season I would agree. I think the Branch signing was a bigger indication. And If Berry ever does make it back, he will probably never get a huge contract.

[Rudy tossed tigger's salad]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Because I bitched so much about the signings of Maclin and Branch, and wept all over the trade for Grubbs.

Moreover, do you think that Hudson is going to see every cent of that 44.5 million? One set of contracts will see every cent, but the second won't? Everyone knows that no one sees the ass end of a non-rookie deal, but that's irrelevant when you are giving guys who would struggle to

I'd put more credence in your response if it wasn't binaristic homerism wrapped in a facade of rationality. Christ, last week on here you were talking about how the 30 yards per game of Avant and his ability to get open deep (to the tune of 11 yards per reception) showed how Bowe (who hauled in passes for a higher YPC) was obsolete.

If I've turned into Clay then you've become Marcellus, Esquire.

Hudson got 20 million guaranteed. Pretty big chunk

[Mr. Laz]

Originally Posted by bigjosh006

Im sure every gm wants to draft jags. They want to draft impact players.

Parker played just fine at safety.

If they keep him away from the corner this is a good signing

actually he wasn't that great at safety either


Wasn't it Coleman that actually broke on the ball and took some pretty good angles? Couldn't catch but was there. I think it was coleman.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz

um ... yea, it is

that means you don't have as much money to pay other guys

I would hope we would upgrade parker and not even have him on the team

instead we pay him 5 million a year?

So essentially this is just you not liking the signing or player?

Again, if you get the production you pay for, it doesn't matter