|
11-13-2012, 03:20 PM | #61 |
You Sweetie!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $2021206219
VARSITY
|
|
Posts: 71,691
|
11-13-2012, 03:21 PM | #62 |
oxymoron
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: OP/KC/Whatever
Casino cash: $9556299
|
Lee's the player you want from USC. Barkley's just kind of there.
|
Posts: 58,682
|
11-13-2012, 03:30 PM | #63 |
.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Casino cash: $57156239
|
Barkley: 64.8 CMP%, 33 TD, 13 INT
Geno: 71.3 CMP%, 31 TD, 3 INT Barkley's OL and surrounding cast is much better, he receives more protection and has more time to throw, and the teams he faced are about as tough or maybe slightly easier than the teams Geno faced. Geno is out-performing him. Geno also looks better. He has to make a decision quicker, and he makes fewer mistakes. The only concern is if Geno can adapt to an NFL offense. Other than that, it really doesn't look like a tough decision to me. I wouldn't be pissed with Barkley, but I'm not picking him over Geno.
__________________
|
Posts: 36,130
|
11-13-2012, 03:38 PM | #64 |
PLAY GOOD FOOTBALL
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: American Gardens Building
Casino cash: $3458654
|
I watch a lot of SC games and Barkley is good theres no doubt about it. In the right system I think he could do very well.
|
Posts: 17,381
|
11-13-2012, 03:41 PM | #65 |
Three-Pat
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Casino cash: $355053
|
If we pick a QB at #1 (and we better draft one), it will be Barkley. He was projected to be a Top 10 if not a Top 5 pick last year in a class with Luck and RGIII. He has done nothing to lose ground, so he should easily be the #1 pick if it is us drafting first.
|
Posts: 17,973
|
11-13-2012, 03:46 PM | #66 |
The Insider
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lake of the Ozarks
Casino cash: $808752
|
Geno's numbers are little schewed by the non-conference games which were off the wall.
He is 67% in Big 12. Barkley is 64% in PAC-12. |
Posts: 50,703
|
11-13-2012, 03:49 PM | #67 |
Needs more middle fingers
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Casino cash: $3103063
|
What's Wilson's SEC #'s?
__________________
Life is like a dick. Sometimes it gets hard for no reason, but it can't stay hard forever. |
Posts: 65,618
|
11-13-2012, 03:51 PM | #68 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2000
Casino cash: $10005036
|
Quote:
Coming into this year everybody was salivating over Tyler Wilson. Now people arn't so sure. I'm just saying I don't think it's so clear cut. I like Barkley but I expect come pro workout day when he's being evaluated vs the physical talents of Wilson & Smith, I think they'll make up some ground on him. |
|
Posts: 5,747
|
11-13-2012, 03:54 PM | #69 |
The Insider
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lake of the Ozarks
Casino cash: $808752
|
|
Posts: 50,703
|
11-13-2012, 03:55 PM | #70 |
Forever Royal
Join Date: Mar 2012
Casino cash: $481300
|
|
Posts: 24,889
|
11-13-2012, 03:55 PM | #71 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2001
Location: midtown KC
Casino cash: $794910
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 17,802
|
11-13-2012, 03:57 PM | #72 |
Curmudgeon
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North by Northwest
Casino cash: $5836784
|
Just pick one. Maybe it's because I've seen more of him, but I like Wilson. I think I'll give Barkley the nod over Smith just because of the style of offense he plays in. Also take a late round flyer on Jordan Rodgers from Vanderbilt.
|
Posts: 5,319
|
11-13-2012, 03:57 PM | #73 |
.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Casino cash: $57156239
|
Thats true, but Geno still has only 3 picks
__________________
|
Posts: 36,130
|
11-13-2012, 03:58 PM | #74 |
I'm your huckleberry
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Northern VA
Casino cash: $7765213
|
I say take Barkley or Geno at 1 and i'm hoping we trade back up into the first and grab a big target for our new qb to work with. We all know Bowe is gone.
Or if we can manage to trade back up high enough to grab millner and then take a wr with our next pick. But that probably won't happen.. |
Posts: 926
|
11-13-2012, 04:02 PM | #75 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Barkley has had some bad games this year, for sure. If he had come out last year, he'd have definitely been the 3rd QB in the Top Ten, if not the Top Five.
Word on the street here is that Lane Kiffin is a goner. Pat Haden and USC believe that Barkley has regressed and not improved this year and to them, the blame lies with Lane Kiffin. Their defense is absolutely loaded with talent but they're playing an antiquated scheme. The bottom line is that Barkley is a mature young man with four years as a starting QB at a Top 25 school. He has all of the immeasurables you'd want in a QB including strong leadership and great character (in addition to respect of his teammates) and he's not lacking in any measurables. Sure, more arm strength would be nice but he's certainly not lacking in arm strength. He'll need to go to a team willing to tailer a WCO offense around his skills and if so, should be a very good NFL QB. Unlike Sanchez and Leinart, Barkley LOVES football. That said, I think it's silly to make any determination now. Wait until after bowl season, after the Combines and after a new GM and coaching staff is in place. |
Posts: 88,960
|
|
|