SCHEFTER- Crennel to Chiefs Imminent

[SLAG]

http://twitter.com/Adam_Schefter/status/7459154936

Originally Posted by Adam Schefter

It's likely to be a New England reunion: Now that Charlie Weis has agreed to work in Kansas City, Romeo Crennel will not be far behind.

Latest update orig posted by MR_Tomahawk:

Giants' candidate Crennel joins Chiefs

http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/giants...ylzTTgr5Hj3wEI

6:28 PM, January 11, 2010 ι By PAUL SCHWARTZ
One-time Giants assistant and former Browns head coach Romeo Crennel will not be the new Giants defensive coordinator. Crennel has been hired to run the Chiefs defense.

Crenell never interviewed with Tom Coughlin but the Giants did express some interest.

One candidate Coughlin has already interviewed, former Bills head coach Perry Fewell, was in Chicago to speak with head coach Lovie Smith about the Bears defensive coordinator job. Fewell is considered the front-runner.

Fewell, once Coughlin's defensive backs coach with the Jaguars, met last Thursday with Coughlin with the understanding he was in the running for the Bears defensive coordinator job. Fewell worked in St. Louis and Chicago for Smith and it appears the two will work together again.

Another interesting possibility: Mike Zimmer. His contract will soon expire with the Bengals. Zimmer successfully ran the defenses for the Cowboys and Falcons and did a solid job this season in Cincinnati. Zimmer may attract some interest around the league as a potential head-coaching candidate.

Tom Cable is expected to be fired as head coach of the Raiders and if he is, Giants offensive coordinator Kevin Gilbride is again likely to get an interview. Gilbride last year interviewed for the job.

[BigChiefFan]

I'm glad the Chiefs are making moves to ATTEMPT to improve. Say what you will, but the team is trying to IMPROVE. Nothing wrong with a little silver lining, now and then.

I don't think we're trying to emulate the Patriots, I think, we're trying to develop the team and call plays that put us in the best situation to improve the team overall.

Coaching does make a difference because motivators , know how to MOTIVATE. These coaches bring in instant credibilty and the players should be very receptive to going to work to attain the ultimate goal. We're coming off a 4 win season and making moves to help instill the philosophy with highly qualified candidates and some just want to piss on the parade.

I don't believe anybody here is so blind to think that this instantly makes us a contender, but rather closer to making us a better team. We need some quality coaches to take player's under their wings and help develop them, these guys bring a history of doing just that.

I'll take the 2010 coaching staff over the 2009 coaching staff, every day of the week.

[FAX]

Originally Posted by Donger

... May I suggest that you learn that lesson, and perhaps not always be so quick to jump on your high-horse?

Sadly, Mr. 'Hamas' Jenkins cannot dismount, Mr. Donger. His panties have twisted their dang selves onto the saddle horn. He is there and there he shall remain.

FAX

[Titty Meat]

Whats the lastest on the Crennel thing any new developments today?

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by Donger

Do you know the definition of intelligence?

There is more than one type and more than one definition. I know this upsets your sophistry-laden schtick, but too damned bad.

[Micjones]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

No, it's derivative. It's the same stupid shit as Hootie calling people drafturbators last year.

That assumes I've ever paid attention to that smack.
I haven't, but carry on.

Congratulations, we've reached the offseason where hope, rainbows, and unicorns spring eternal and the mere idea that the Chiefs could be good means that they will be good.

I'm sure I said that somewhere. Now if we could only find it...

The same stupid shit happened last year. People overrode critical thinking with hope and marginalized people who used the former?

Because if you opt to give the new regime time and are slower to form such concrete opinions...it means you haven't engaged in critical thought.

And what have you learned?

Not a goddamned thing.

I've learned that it's impossible to argue with people who don't use logic as a standard of measurement.

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Actually, when it came to football, I did have a lot to do with it, because I took time to learn and study the intricacies.

I'm sure OTW would tell you the same, as he has often communicate the story of how little he knew when he first came here and how much Parker helped him (even through caustic replies) out.

This.

Having played the game competitively since I was 7 years old, I felt I had a pretty firm grasp of things.

But I learned something every day from this place, Parker especially.

Now, if I debate something, or jump into an argument, I do my best to present my case with facts, stats and evidence, like Parker did, to support my case.

Sadly, most people here aren't interested in learning or putting forth the effort. They'd rather negatively stereotype those that do.

[RedThat]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

You do realize that there is a process to this, right?

Guys like billay, who came here with little football knowledge, ask legitimate questions and get legitimate answers from me.

People like Gunther Fan/John_Wayne who continually post moronic shit time after time eventually prove to not be worth the effort (These are your RedThat's in this thread, FWIW).

The one exception to this are Patriots fans who come here acting like Pioli's asshole lint is the golden fleece. They are treated like Russian POWs.

So since you claim to be smarter than others, and act like you have the football knowledge, why don't you share it with others whom you feel don't have the knowledge in a polite intellegent way rather than screaming and being a dick about it and than going against them and arguing and complaining or keeping stuff to yourself?

This proves that you are a dick. So you take your words back and swallow them since you're basically showing to the rest of the world that you prove to not be worth the effort. I give up. No use in talking with you, you are one arrogant, angry, miserable, whinny little bastard.

[keg in kc]

Originally Posted by billay

Whats the lastest on the Crennel thing any new developments today?

No. Still supposedly tomorrow.

[Titty Meat]

Mic I hope you take a step back and evaluate everything the "4horsemen" said during last offseason. As someone who argued aginst them I gotta say for the most part they were correct, however were they right long term about Cassel? That remains to be seen it'll probably be somewhere in between.

[DeezNutz]

Originally Posted by keg in kc

No. Still supposedly tomorrow.

Shut up, pussy.

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by RedThat

So since you claim to be smarter than others, and act like you have the football knowledge, why don't you share it with others whom you feel don't have the knowledge in a polite intellegent way rather screaming and being a dick about it and than going against them and arguing and complaining or keeping stuff to yourself?

This proves that you are a dick. So you take your words back and swallow them since you're basically showing to the rest of the world that you prove to not be worth the effort. I give up. No use in talking with you, you are one arrogant, angry, miserable, whinny little bastard.

Don't lament about people bitching and rushing to judgment when a year ago you were calling Glenn Dorsey a bust halfway into his rookie year.

Furthermore, don't make false claims, like the fact that the Pats were built upon their special teams. They weren't. You can't back that up because it's patently false. No one has ever suggested or even alluded to that possibility before 15 minutes ago.

You deserve the level of respect consummate to the level of thought you put into these discussions: None.

Kindly **** yourself.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

There is more than one type and more than one definition. I know this upsets your sophistry-laden schtick, but too damned bad.

Okay. The commonly-accepted definition of intelligence is the ability to learn and/or cope with new situations and ideas. In other words, innate ability.

Intelligence isn't learned; you either have it or you don't.

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by Micjones

I've learned that it's impossible to argue with people who don't use logic as a standard of measurement.

I have no words.

[keg in kc]

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Shut up, pussy.

You know, you wouldn't always have to shout that during the act if you'd stick a few fingers inside along with your pinky-sized dingus.

[Chief Faithful]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

If you'd read the posts in question, you'd see that Singletary, playing in the pre-FA period, doesn't have the financial worth to help make his decision for him.

He has motivation to coach because it pays a shit-ton more money than playing ever did.

Again, an ex-player sitting on an 8-figure bank account is not going to be interested in taking a job that demands 20 hour work days and wages of a few hundred thousand dollars.

And I disagree with that reasoning because many top athletes are motivated by the environment, power, and competition not the money. Singletary has plenty of wealth, but he is still driven to compete just as he was as a player. People laugh at modern players who say, "I would play this game even if it was for free" (e.g. Ray Lewis), but I believe they mean what they say. Why else would someone like Shannarat return to coaching when money is not an issue?