|
07-06-2016, 05:30 PM | #616 |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Casino cash: $6318777
|
Saw the sear thing, I've always used cast iron to get my sear so a bit disappointed they didn't compare that one.
Also saw this one recently, anyone tried burgers sous vide? |
Posts: 2,446
|
07-06-2016, 08:32 PM | #617 | |
Cast Iron Jedi
Join Date: Nov 2004
Casino cash: $9999900
VARSITY
|
Quote:
I've done a couple sous vide. Nothing too in depth, but the tenderness and juiciness is incomparable. |
|
Posts: 35,253
|
07-21-2016, 07:42 AM | #618 |
Scarlett Johansson's boytoy
Join Date: Nov 2006
Casino cash: $9555998
|
__________________
|
Posts: 12,526
|
07-22-2016, 08:26 AM | #619 |
Cast Iron Jedi
Join Date: Nov 2004
Casino cash: $9999900
VARSITY
|
So you like runny yolks on your burgers or pasta? Try the runny yolk sauce.
http://www.cooksscience.com/recipes/...ny-yolk-sauce/ |
Posts: 35,253
|
07-22-2016, 08:29 AM | #620 | |
Baba Ganoush
Join Date: Jan 2012
Casino cash: $1748026
|
Quote:
__________________
My Kansas City Chief record 9-9 |
|
Posts: 29,439
|
07-22-2016, 08:33 AM | #621 |
Cast Iron Jedi
Join Date: Nov 2004
Casino cash: $9999900
VARSITY
|
|
Posts: 35,253
|
07-22-2016, 08:43 AM | #622 |
Baba Ganoush
Join Date: Jan 2012
Casino cash: $1748026
|
On pasta, but not on burgers? Seek help.
__________________
My Kansas City Chief record 9-9 |
Posts: 29,439
|
07-22-2016, 08:45 AM | #623 |
Cast Iron Jedi
Join Date: Nov 2004
Casino cash: $9999900
VARSITY
|
I don't generally like runny eggs at all. It's a texture thing - like warm snot. The taste is fine, but I can't take that texture.
But on pasta, a runny yolk mixes with the residual starchy water, and if done right slightly cooks it into this rich, creamy sauce. It's awesome. |
Posts: 35,253
|
08-11-2016, 08:46 AM | #624 |
Cast Iron Jedi
Join Date: Nov 2004
Casino cash: $9999900
VARSITY
|
|
Posts: 35,253
|
08-24-2016, 09:40 AM | #625 |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Casino cash: $6318777
|
Anyone done a corned beef brisket flat? I'm seeing numbers all over the place, 135 for 48 hours or 175 for 10. 175 for 10 seems like it would produce something closer to what I'm used to just wondering if anyone has tried either.
|
Posts: 2,446
|
08-24-2016, 09:56 AM | #626 | |
Cast Iron Jedi
Join Date: Nov 2004
Casino cash: $9999900
VARSITY
|
Quote:
Your textures and doneness will be more traditional at the higher temp. |
|
Posts: 35,253
|
09-18-2016, 07:44 PM | #627 |
Cynical Misanthrope
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Alaska
Casino cash: $1071379
|
I just did a chuck roast for 48 hours at 131.5. Seasoned it with salt and pepper and ancho chili pepper and ground mushrooms. Super tender. Just about melt in your mouth. I've never had anything like it. I've braised chuck roasts for years and never got one this tender or flavorful.
|
Posts: 3,963
|
09-18-2016, 07:52 PM | #628 | |
MVP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Joplin, MO
Casino cash: $13252338
|
Quote:
I really like the 72 hour short ribs.
__________________
|
|
Posts: 7,233
|
09-18-2016, 08:35 PM | #629 |
Cynical Misanthrope
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Alaska
Casino cash: $1071379
|
No veggies in the bag. Garlic and ginger can develop off flavor a and most veggies would be mush. I just seasoned it very heavily. If you like the 72 hour ribs, you'll like this.
|
Posts: 3,963
|
10-15-2016, 02:05 PM | #630 |
Cast Iron Jedi
Join Date: Nov 2004
Casino cash: $9999900
VARSITY
|
I have two HUGE KC strips from Costco I'm probably going to put in the sous vide tomorrow. Each one is damn near 2 pounds. I haven't quite decided if I want to sous vide them or hang them in the Pit Barrel Cooker. The ribeyes I did in the PBC a few weeks ago were rock star.
|
Posts: 35,253
|
|
|