Food and Drink This Pretty Girl Was Seeking A Rich Husband - Page 4

R8RFAN · 03-29-2014, 06:44 PM

The following is what a women posted on a dating forum seeking a rich husband:

I’m going to be honest of what I’m going to say here. I’m 25 this year. I’m very pretty, have style and good taste. I wish to marry a guy with $500k annual salary or above. You might say that I’m greedy, but an annual salary of $1M is considered only as middle class in New York.

My requirement is not high. Is there anyone in this forum who has an income of $500k annual salary? Are you all married? I wanted to ask: what should I do to marry rich persons like you?

Among those I’ve dated, the richest is $250k annual income, and it seems that this is my upper limit.
If someone is going to move into high cost residential area on the west of New York City Garden(?), $250k annual income is not enough.

I’m here humbly to ask a few questions:

1) Where do most rich bachelors hang out? (Please list down the names and addresses of bars, restaurant, gym)
2) Which age group should I target?
3) Why most wives of the riches are only average-looking? I’ve met a few girls who don’t have looks and are not interesting, but they are able to marry rich guys.
4) How do you decide who can be your wife, and who can only be your girlfriend? (my target now is to get married)
Ms. Pretty

A philosophical reply from CEO of J.P. Morgan below:

Dear Ms. Pretty,
I have read your post with great interest. Guess there are lots of girls out there who have similar questions like yours. Please allow me to analyse your situation as a professional investor.
My annual income is more than $500k, which meets your requirement, so I hope everyone believes that I’m not wasting time here.
From the standpoint of a business person, it is a bad decision to marry you. The answer is very simple, so let me explain.

Put the details aside, what you’re trying to do is an exchange of “beauty” and “money” : Person A provides beauty, and Person B pays for it, fair and square.
However, there’s a deadly problem here, your beauty will fade, but my money will not be gone without any good reason. The fact is, my income might increase from year to year, but you can’t be prettier year after year.

Hence from the viewpoint of economics, I am an appreciation asset, and you are a depreciation asset. It’s not just normal depreciation, but exponential depreciation. If that is your only asset, your value will be much worse 10 years later.

By the terms we use in Wall Street, every trading has a position, dating with you is also a “trading position”.
If the trade value dropped we will sell it and it is not a good idea to keep it for long term – same goes with the marriage that you wanted. It might be cruel to say this, but in order to make a wiser decision any assets with great depreciation value will be sold or “leased”.

Anyone with over $500k annual income is not a fool; we would only date you, but will not marry you. I would advice that you forget looking for any clues to marry a rich guy. And by the way, you could make yourself to become a rich person with $500k annual income.This has better chance than finding a rich fool.

Hope this reply helps.

signed,
J.P. Morgan CEO
http://www.worthytoshare.com/pretty-...ker-priceless#

**Reaper16** · 03-30-2014, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz

On this we agree...

And that's why in cases that involve athletes (of any color), assholes or not, I start with "not guilty" until "proof" is shown. If it's all going to be based on "she said, she said", I'm not sure I think a guy who could tap as much hot pussy as he wants needs to resort to "rape" to get his Ricky-Thing wet. So it may be true, but they're going to need more than "I said no, but he kept going anyway."

On the flip side, I'm not going to judge the women as whores or nuns, but when push comes to shove and you're in a man's room at 2:00am, and you're not fresh off a farm without TV or Internet (that you never left), I'm thinking the "innocent" part of "innocent until proven guilt" wins.

Sad if a rape goes unpunished, but it takes more than mere words to qualify as "proof" IMO.

But that's just me....

Really then you should suspend judgment entirely until proof is established. Not begin with "not guilty" but rather begin without judgment entirely on either party. Otherwise it sounds like the caricature of "lying, money-grubbing whore" is your default assumption of women who make a rape allegation.

**srvy** · 03-30-2014, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 13and3

Marry a black athlete. Its what other money grubbing whores do.

What Fatass Williams sister should I whore around with?

GloryDayz · 03-30-2014, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16

Really then you should suspend judgment entirely until proof is established. Not begin with "not guilty" but rather begin without judgment entirely on either party. Otherwise it sounds like the caricature of "lying, money-grubbing whore" is your default assumption of women who make a rape allegation.

I see your point, but I think "innocent until proven guilty" starts with the assumption of innocent and establishing proof is the burden of the accuser. And "I told him no" is hardly proof. And I don't think leading what some hard-liners call a promiscuous life makes you either a whore, slut, or even immoral, but common sense does say playing the Nun card later on is a bit disingenuous at face value.

All I'm saying is uncorroborated conversation isn't enough, and prolly should not have been since the 70's or 80s.

vailpass · 03-30-2014, 01:42 PM

Just another day in Scottsdale...

GloryDayz · 03-30-2014, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by srvy

What Fatass Williams sister should I whore around with?

My dick may not come out for a week! Can we please go back to pics of Anne Hathaway??

Just Passin' By · 03-30-2014, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz

...And I don't think leading what some hard-liners call a promiscuous life makes you either a whore, slut, or even immoral,...

Well, yeah, it does. By definition.

GloryDayz · 03-30-2014, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

Well, yeah, it does. By definition.

I don't. I think it makes you alive and not boring.

vailpass · 03-30-2014, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz

I don't. I think it makes you alive and not boring.

Not disagreeing but curious: how would you define "slut"?

Just Passin' By · 03-30-2014, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz

I don't. I think it makes you alive and not boring.

No offense, but what you think doesn't matter, in terms of accuracy.. You don't get to re-define the English language. It's definitional.

Quote:

Definition of SLUT
1
chiefly British : a slovenly woman
2
a : a promiscuous woman; especially : prostitute
b : a saucy girl : minx

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/slut

A promiscuous women is, indeed, a slut, by definition.

Quote:

Definition of WHORE
1
: a woman who engages in sexual acts for money : prostitute; also : a promiscuous or immoral woman

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dicti...ry&word=whore#

A promiscuous women is also a whore, by definition.

Katipan · 03-30-2014, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz

On this we agree...

And that's why in cases that involve athletes (of any color), assholes or not, I start with "not guilty" until "proof" is shown. If it's all going to be based on "she said, she said", I'm not sure I think a guy who could tap as much hot pussy as he wants needs to resort to "rape" to get his Ricky-Thing wet. So it may be true, but they're going to need more than "I said no, but he kept going anyway."

On the flip side, I'm not going to judge the women as whores or nuns, but when push comes to shove and you're in a man's room at 2:00am, and you're not fresh off a farm without TV or Internet (that you never left), I'm thinking the "innocent" part of "innocent until proven guilt" wins.

Sad if a rape goes unpunished, but it takes more than mere words to qualify as "proof" IMO.

But that's just me....

I'm very much opposed to handing out victim cards all willy nilly. I think it would behoove my sex to take a little more responsibility for positions we find ourselves in. But that being said. There are far easier ways to get your dick wet than by rape. It absolutely has nothing to do with the physical hard on and everything to do with the mental one.

vailpass · 03-30-2014, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Katipan

I'm very much opposed to handing out victim cards all willy nilly. I think it would behoove my sex to take a little more responsibility for positions we find ourselves in. But that being said. There are far easier ways to get your dick wet than by rape. It absolutely has nothing to do with the physical hard on and everything to do with the mental one.

Abso****inglutely...

GloryDayz · 03-30-2014, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass

Not disagreeing but curious: how would you define "slut"?

I choose not to. It's derogatory and usually sexist. Not worth my time...

But if I to put words to it, I'd say Michelle Obama is a slut.

GloryDayz · 03-30-2014, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

No offense, but what you think doesn't matter, in terms of accuracy.. You don't get to re-define the English language. It's definitional.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/slut

A promiscuous women is, indeed, a slut, by definition.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dicti...ry&word=whore#

A promiscuous women is also a whore, by definition.

Sure I can... Words are redifined all the time. Look at the word gay.

GloryDayz · 03-30-2014, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Katipan

I'm very much opposed to handing out victim cards all willy nilly. I think it would behoove my sex to take a little more responsibility for positions we find ourselves in. But that being said. There are far easier ways to get your dick wet than by rape. It absolutely has nothing to do with the physical hard on and everything to do with the mental one.

I agree. That's why I don't think most of these cases where some girl cries rape should go much further than, "what proof do you have that it wasn't consensual, and was a violent act? And semen in the panties or elsewhere proves only that there was sex, not that it wasn't consensual."

Just Passin' By · 03-30-2014, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz

Sure I can... Words are redifined all the time. Look at the word gay.

The word gay still means what it meant before.

Quote:

1
a : happily excited : merry
b : keenly alive and exuberant : having or inducing high spirits
2
a : bright, lively
b : brilliant in color

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gay

A new definition has been added due to modern usage, but the old definition remains. A promiscuous woman is still immoral, a slut and a whore, by definition. Your personal love, respect and/or admiration for such a woman is a separate issue.

03-29-2014, 06:44 PM
R8RFAN Molôn Labé Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: North Carolina Casino cash: $8566872	This Pretty Girl Was Seeking A Rich Husband The following is what a women posted on a dating forum seeking a rich husband: I’m going to be honest of what I’m going to say here. I’m 25 this year. I’m very pretty, have style and good taste. I wish to marry a guy with $500k annual salary or above. You might say that I’m greedy, but an annual salary of $1M is considered only as middle class in New York. My requirement is not high. Is there anyone in this forum who has an income of $500k annual salary? Are you all married? I wanted to ask: what should I do to marry rich persons like you? Among those I’ve dated, the richest is $250k annual income, and it seems that this is my upper limit. If someone is going to move into high cost residential area on the west of New York City Garden(?), $250k annual income is not enough. I’m here humbly to ask a few questions: 1) Where do most rich bachelors hang out? (Please list down the names and addresses of bars, restaurant, gym) 2) Which age group should I target? 3) Why most wives of the riches are only average-looking? I’ve met a few girls who don’t have looks and are not interesting, but they are able to marry rich guys. 4) How do you decide who can be your wife, and who can only be your girlfriend? (my target now is to get married) Ms. Pretty A philosophical reply from CEO of J.P. Morgan below: Dear Ms. Pretty, I have read your post with great interest. Guess there are lots of girls out there who have similar questions like yours. Please allow me to analyse your situation as a professional investor. My annual income is more than $500k, which meets your requirement, so I hope everyone believes that I’m not wasting time here. From the standpoint of a business person, it is a bad decision to marry you. The answer is very simple, so let me explain. Put the details aside, what you’re trying to do is an exchange of “beauty” and “money” : Person A provides beauty, and Person B pays for it, fair and square. However, there’s a deadly problem here, your beauty will fade, but my money will not be gone without any good reason. The fact is, my income might increase from year to year, but you can’t be prettier year after year. Hence from the viewpoint of economics, I am an appreciation asset, and you are a depreciation asset. It’s not just normal depreciation, but exponential depreciation. If that is your only asset, your value will be much worse 10 years later. By the terms we use in Wall Street, every trading has a position, dating with you is also a “trading position”. If the trade value dropped we will sell it and it is not a good idea to keep it for long term – same goes with the marriage that you wanted. It might be cruel to say this, but in order to make a wiser decision any assets with great depreciation value will be sold or “leased”. Anyone with over $500k annual income is not a fool; we would only date you, but will not marry you. I would advice that you forget looking for any clues to marry a rich guy. And by the way, you could make yourself to become a rich person with $500k annual income.This has better chance than finding a rich fool. Hope this reply helps. signed, J.P. Morgan CEO http://www.worthytoshare.com/pretty-...ker-priceless#
Posts: 23,166

03-30-2014, 01:42 PM	#49
vailpass Psycho Bag Of Squanch Join Date: Sep 2001 Casino cash: $9594244	Just another day in Scottsdale... __________________ “Education is a weapon whose effect depends on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed.” Joseph Stalin
Posts: 69,591