2018 Free Agents

[Couch-Potato]

Who are you letting walk/cutting/retiring?

http://chiefswire.usatoday.com/2018/...8-free-agents/


Who are you targeting?

http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/nf...t-tracker?pg=1

[DaNewGuy]

I'm gonna predict the Orlando Rage

[Sassy Squatch]

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19

I’d do it even faster if that were the case

Agree to disagree, especially when it comes to the Eagles.

[Mother****erJones]

Originally Posted by O.city

So Odell has had multiple meltdowns and shouldn't be traded for, but the Peters trade was the dumbest shit the CHiefs have ever done?

I didn’t say I wouldn’t trade for him. I said I wouldn’t trade THAT much of a package.

[O.city]

That's just cutting off the lifeblood of your roster. If someone offered that deal, the Giants would have broken their dicks from being so erect and accepting it.

[pugsnotdrugs19]

Originally Posted by Superturtle

Agree to disagree, especially when it comes to the Eagles.

Sure it strengthens them greatly in the short term, but you’re talking about giving up 5 great draft picks for a WR who has some baggage and needs to be paid like an above average QB soon.

I’d do it even with a division rival.

[Easy 6]

Originally Posted by RippedmyFlesh

Please be denver

Amen

[Mother****erJones]

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19

Sure it strengthens them greatly in the short term, but you’re talking about giving up 5 great draft picks for a WR who has some baggage and needs to be paid like an above average QB soon.

I’d do it even with a division rival.

He’s gota he paid immediately. He’s not playing unless he’s paid.

[Beef Supreme]

This can't be real info. I mean, really, can it?

[O.city]

They'd already have a contract in place if they make that trade.

[Sassy Squatch]

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19

Sure it strengthens them greatly in the short term, but you’re talking about giving up 5 great draft picks for a WR who has some baggage and needs to be paid like an above average QB soon.

I’d do it even with a division rival.

3 of the 5 picks are at the bottom of their respective rounds, and barring something ridiculous the 2 future firsts will be near the bottom as well. It makes total sense, but holy shit that's a bitter pill for Giants fans to swallow.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by Superturtle

3 of the 5 picks are at the bottom of their respective rounds, and barring something ridiculous the 2 future firsts will be near the bottom as well. It makes total sense, but holy shit that's a bitter pill for Giants fans to swallow.

Even then, that's what, 15 years of cheap labor you're giving up for a WR?

Theres just no way that's right and if it is, the Giants would have taken it

[O.city]

And if the Giants won't or don't take that deal, they don't really want to trade him.

[pugsnotdrugs19]

Originally Posted by Superturtle

3 of the 5 picks are at the bottom of their respective rounds, and barring something ridiculous the 2 future firsts will be near the bottom as well. It makes total sense, but holy shit that's a bitter pill for Giants fans to swallow.

I think I’d still do it. It’s just too crazy of a price for a WR not to accept IMO.

[Sassy Squatch]

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19

I think I’d still do it. It’s just too crazy of a price for a WR not to accept IMO.

That's like trading Kelce to the Super Bowl winning Broncos. God, that would be painful.

[O.city]

I guess other than Mahomes, there isn't a guy on the roster I wouldn't trade in a heartbeat for that deal.

Hill, Kelce you name it.