Welp, Lesean McCoy is done

[Strongside]

What a ****ing disgrace. Ban this shit bag from the league IMMEDIATELY.



https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/lesean-...ews.54697.html

[ToxSocks]

Originally Posted by O.city

That's nuts.

So don't pay rent, you can just still stay there? How the **** is this legal?

I don't know, i wasn't part of the legal proceedings. I helped him photograph the property, helped him with documents etc. No idea what happened in court. But essentially the tenant was able to drag it on and on via the court system.

He was even able to place a restraining order on my co-worker. Yes, a non-rent paying tenant was able to place a restraining order on the owner of the property. Everytime he wanted to go see the property we had to call the police and request an escort.

This dude was such a **** head.

[ToxSocks]

My co-worker wanted to go inside the property to make sure the smoke detectors were working etc and do an evaluation. We had to have a police escort for that too as well as permission from the judge.

When we got there, the tenant still refused, got on the phone with his lawyer. We waited on the street for two hours while the judge who was handling the case finally forced access, but required the police escort to be there.

[Baby Lee]

Originally Posted by O.city

That's nuts.

So don't pay rent, you can just still stay there? How the **** is this legal?

Adverse possession was supported as a legal way to promote use of abandoned shelter in order to decrease homelessness and promote constructive use of otherwise neglected property.

Optimally, a structure that everyone else had abandoned and neglected would be inhabited by someone in need, who would then keep the structure and attendant real estate in good repair and perhaps even make improvements.

Reliably though, people found ways to exploit all the procedural protections to extend their right to reside. Properties that weren't actually abandoned were inhabited and the inhabitant refuses to leave until there is a full legal vetting regarding all relevant issues, which a clever attorney will stretch out as long as possible.

[Frazod]

Originally Posted by O.city

That's nuts.

So don't pay rent, you can just still stay there? How the **** is this legal?

God knows it shouldn't be. And it's the sort of thing that nobody in a position of authority gives a **** about, either.

[O.city]

Damn, I had no idea on this. My parents have a couple rental properties and haven't had problems with it, but ****.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by Baby Lee

Adverse possession was supported as a legal way to promote use of abandoned shelter in order to decrease homelessness and promote constructive use of otherwise neglected property.

Optimally, a structure that everyone else had abandoned and neglected would be inhabited by someone in need, who would then keep the structure and attendant real estate in good repair and perhaps even make improvements.

Reliably though, people found ways to exploit all the procedural protections to extend their right to reside. Properties that weren't actually abandoned were inhabited and the inhabitant refuses to leave until there is a full legal vetting regarding all relevant issues, which a clever attorney will stretch out as long as possible.

So it's essentially a law set up for other reasons that can be used as a work around.

[Frazod]

Originally Posted by O.city

Damn, I had no idea on this. My parents have a couple rental properties and haven't had problems with it, but ****.

You should watch the movie Pacific Heights sometime.

[displacedinMN]

Originally Posted by Baby Lee

Adverse possession was supported as a legal way to promote use of abandoned shelter in order to decrease homelessness and promote constructive use of otherwise neglected property.

Optimally, a structure that everyone else had abandoned and neglected would be inhabited by someone in need, who would then keep the structure and attendant real estate in good repair and perhaps even make improvements.

Reliably though, people found ways to exploit all the procedural protections to extend their right to reside. Properties that weren't actually abandoned were inhabited and the inhabitant refuses to leave until there is a full legal vetting regarding all relevant issues, which a clever attorney will stretch out as long as possible.

I have heard of crap like this. Someone goes away on vacation-comes back and someone is in their house and it is almost impossible to get them out. Even the police cannot drag them out. Of course states differ-California is bad.

[ToxSocks]

Originally Posted by displacedinMN

I have heard of crap like this. Someone goes away on vacation-comes back and someone is in their house and it is almost impossible to get them out. Even the police cannot drag them out. Of course states differ-California is bad.

You don't really hear about it much because most don't have the means, knowledge or will power. I don't imagine California is much different than other states in this regard.

The poor are who most often get evicted. They can't afford a lawyer to fight it and they're generally intimidated by police/courts anyway so they get served and leave. That's what we see most often, which is why a lot of us assume that eviction isn't a complicated process.

It's complicated if someone has the means to make it complicated.

[loochy]

Originally Posted by displacedinMN

I have heard of crap like this. Someone goes away on vacation-comes back and someone is in their house and it is almost impossible to get them out. Even the police cannot drag them out. Of course states differ-California is bad.

try that in Texas
Posted via Mobile Device

[displacedinMN]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

You don't really hear about it much because most don't have the means, knowledge or will power. I don't imagine California is much different than other states in this regard.

The poor are who most often get evicted. They can't afford a lawyer to fight it and they're generally intimidated by police/courts anyway so they get served and leave. That's what we see most often, which is why a lot of us assume that eviction isn't a complicated process.

It's complicated if someone has the means to make it complicated.

https://www.nbcnews.com/video/squatt...on-40605763577

[TEX]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

You don't really hear about it much because most don't have the means, knowledge or will power. I don't imagine California is much different than other states in this regard.

The poor are who most often get evicted. They can't afford a lawyer to fight it and they're generally intimidated by police/courts anyway so they get served and leave. That's what we see most often, which is why a lot of us assume that eviction isn't a complicated process.

It's complicated if someone has the means to make it complicated.

Sure can. Especially if some of their stuff is there...

[TEX]

Originally Posted by loochy

try that in Texas
Posted via Mobile Device

Shoot - Even in Texas in can take up to 90 days to get rid of someone if the person occupying the house has items that belong to them there that could indicate "residency" and has the means to obtain legal council.

Ask me how I know...

But yes, for the most part, it is harder to pull off in Texas than most states.

[loochy]

Originally Posted by TEX

Shoot - Even in Texas in can take up to 90 days to get rid of someone if the person occupying the house has items that belong to them there that could indicate "residency" and has the means to obtain legal council.

Ask me how I know...

But yes, for the most part, it is harder to pull off in Texas than most states.

We tend to...uh...like our guns here. I don't think it would end well.
Posted via Mobile Device

[Beef Supreme]

Originally Posted by TEX

Shoot - Even in Texas in can take up to 90 days to get rid of someone if the person occupying the house has items that belong to them there that could indicate "residency" and has the means to obtain legal council.

Ask me how I know...

But yes, for the most part, it is harder to pull off in Texas than most states.

If someone comes home from vacation and some stranger is in their house and they shoot that stranger in the face because they feared for their life, I am pretty sure someone will come along and remove the body.