Chiefs are planning to retain Romeo Crennel and remove interim tag

[ShowtimeSBMVP]

AdamSchefterAdam Schefter
Chiefs are planning to retain Romeo Crennel and remove interim tag from his title. Move would be popular in the locker room.

[Mr. Laz]

If they keep Cassel then Pioli has put his job on the line with this decision.

continuity helps a lot of things but also puts a big bullseye on the decision maker.

[Baby Lee]

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

That's fine. I'm all for getting rid of the trash. But if the answer is to keep a QB who is only marginally better, what's the point?

Can a team, realistically, expect to win a SB with Orton?

Draft, draft, draft, draft. If Orton keeps the seat warm, cool. If Orton is considered the answer, they all need to **** their mothers.

There are three scenarios

Cassel -v- Orton --> No brainer
Orton -v- all QBs available to us BEFORE Orton walks --> pretty much a no brainer as well
Orton -v- FA Manning and/or draft maneuvers --> different matter entirely, but even then nothing is guaranteed us as we have neither #1 pick in the draft nor exclusive rights to Manning. Depends on what presents itself wrt opportunity and cost.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Clark's not stupid, he just doesn't give a **** about anything but the bottom line.

I disagree on this. Remember, it was hunt who basically gave herm license to rebuild the team even though peterson's approach probably would have led to more short term wins. And it sounded pretty clear that he had an almost informal agreement with herm that his job would be safe even if they had a losing season in 2008.

Judging by piolis demeanor in the press conference I truly believe pioli is walking on egg shells right now. I think bunt seems like a guy who actively holds his GMs accountable. I think if this team sinks, piolis gone.

[Extra Point]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Chiefs fans always amaze me with their ability to settle.

Originally Posted by milkman

It's a skill honed from decades of settling.

Cheer down. We could still have Haley.

[dirk digler]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

I disagree on this. Remember, it was hunt who basically gave herm license to rebuild the team even though peterson's approach probably would have led to more short term wins. And it sounded pretty clear that he had an almost informal agreement with herm that his job would be safe even if they had a losing season in 2008.

Judging by piolis demeanor in the press conference I truly believe pioli is walking on egg shells right now. I think bunt seems like a guy who actively holds his GMs accountable. I think if this team sinks, piolis gone.

****ing bs. Clark is making Mike Brown look like a genius.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

I disagree on this. Remember, it was hunt who basically gave herm license to rebuild the team even though peterson's approach probably would have led to more short term wins. And it sounded pretty clear that he had an almost informal agreement with herm that his job would be safe even if they had a losing season in 2008.

Judging by piolis demeanor in the press conference I truly believe pioli is walking on egg shells right now. I think bunt seems like a guy who actively holds his GMs accountable. I think if this team sinks, piolis gone.

That's funny.

I think I might start using this as his new nickname.

[FringeNC]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Clark's not stupid, he just doesn't give a **** about anything but the bottom line.

If so, he's unique. Guys that wealthy would prefer more status to more wealth, and winning championships gets you status.

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

Billay disputes this post.
Posted via Mobile Device

7 inch cock? Check. Syphilis free? Probably. Can make a girl cum? Not a ****ing chance. Have yourself a hearty LOL as Sauto's porn dreams go down the shitter faster than Steven Segal's music career.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by dirk digler

****ing bs. Clark is making Mike Brown look like a genius.

Why! He went out and spent a lot of money on a rock star gm. It was like hiring parcels only to realize you were getting a retread version of him.

He fired a gm, hired the most coveted candidate, and it appears he grilled the shit out of pioli a few months ago. As for cheapness, I don't know if we know how much that's a hunt directive or how much that is pioli trying to arrogantly prove he can build a team for less. That was his m.o. In new England.

I don't have a problem with what hunts done so far. We're not losing because we aren't spending. We are losing because the all star has made a few huge miscalculations.

[L.A. Chieffan]

romeo is a hardass that the players respect. i like the hire

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by FringeNC

If so, he's unique. Guys that wealthy would prefer more status to more wealth, and winning championships gets you status.

He does with the sport he truly cares about: soccer.

There is a fundamental disagreement with how we view the team and how Clark viewed it. To the Hunts, the Chiefs are an asset, an investment. It's a financial property, not an emotional one. It's also a guaranteed bankable profit.

I think his passion is soccer, and its reflected by the difference in the way the teams are managed.

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by milkman

That's funny.

I think I might start using this as his new nickname.

I've always preferred cHunt

[ChiefsCountry]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

He does with the sport he truly cares about: soccer.

There is a fundamental disagreement with how we view the team and how Clark viewed it. To the Hunts, the Chiefs are an asset, an investment. It's a financial property, not an emotional one. It's also a guaranteed bankable profit.

I think his passion is soccer, and its reflected by the difference in the way the teams are managed.

Soccer teams don't mean jack shit. The MLS salary cap is what the Chiefs just paid Bobby Greenwood. Its like a car dealer buying a driving range since he likes golf. Of course you are going to be more conservative with your big money maker than you are with your hobby.

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

He does with the sport he truly cares about: soccer.

There is a fundamental disagreement with how we view the team and how Clark viewed it. To the Hunts, the Chiefs are an asset, an investment. It's a financial property, not an emotional one. It's also a guaranteed bankable profit.

I think his passion is soccer, and its reflected by the difference in the way the teams are managed.

His soccer teams are poorly ran as well.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

Soccer teams don't mean jack shit. The MLS salary cap is what the Chiefs just paid Bobby Greenwood. Its like a car dealer buying a driving range since he likes golf. Of course you are going to be more conservative with your big money maker than you are with your hobby.

A lot of smart people dont get that the soccer team costs about the same to run per year as these families make in about a week
Posted via Mobile Device