Chiefs Words from Andy Reid - Page 2

T-post Tom · 12:44 AM

. ,

Bag-o-dicks to the repost police.

RunKC · 03-21-2013, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

How long have you been a chiefs fan?

Of course you don't, but like any other position, you have a better chance getting one there than any where else. Especially now with te way qbs fly off the board, guys who have much chance at all are going to e over drafted.

Sorry, but I'd rather take a qb in the top 10 than take my chances of finding a guy in the 2nd round.

I would be for taking one in the first round, it's just been proven that you don't need the 1st overall pick to get that guy anymore, even top 10.

These kids are becoming so much more prepared for the NFL than we've ever seen. Add that with the rules to protect QB's and WR's and you have a formula for success.

Chief_For_Life58 · 03-21-2013, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

No doubt in my mind.

This team will win just enough games to keep us away from quarterbacks in the draft, but Alex Smith will also keep us from winning playoff games against defenses that can take away the run game and make us one dimensional.

YYYYYAAAYYYYY YIPPPEEEE!!!!!

Marcellus · 03-21-2013, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

No doubt in my mind.

This team will win just enough games to keep us away from quarterbacks in the draft, but Alex Smith will also keep us from winning playoff games against defenses that can take away the run game and make us one dimensional.

Then you have no need to waste your time watching games this season.

O.city · 03-21-2013, 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

I would be for taking one in the first round, it's just been proven that you don't need the 1st overall pick to get that guy anymore, even top 10.

These kids are becoming so much more prepared for the NFL than we've ever seen. Add that with the rules to protect QB's and WR's and you have a formula for success.

Then by that logic you don't need to pick any position in the top 10 cause you can find them elsewhere.

You have a better chance of getting a franchise qb in the top of the first round, same as any other position. Saying you won't take one there because they can be found elsewhere is just bad logic.

**Easy 6** · 03-21-2013, 09:53 AM

Boy, those defensive rankings were eye gougers, but i'm gonna put about 2/3 of that on an offense that consistently hung them out to dry in every game but one.

O.city · 03-21-2013, 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

I would be for taking one in the first round, it's just been proven that you don't need the 1st overall pick to get that guy anymore, even top 10.

These kids are becoming so much more prepared for the NFL than we've ever seen. Add that with the rules to protect QB's and WR's and you have a formula for success.

And you seem to be using the anomalies to justify this. For every Russell Wilson there are 10 Brody croyles.

All everyone here is saying is that you have a better chance at getting a better qb the higher you draft one

RunKC · 03-21-2013, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

Then by that logic you don't need to pick any position in the top 10 cause you can find them elsewhere.

You have a better chance of getting a franchise qb in the top of the first round, same as any other position. Saying you won't take one there because they can be found elsewhere is just bad logic.

I would definitely take one if he seemed like a good QB prospect, but unfortunately that's not the case this year.

We will be picking in the teens at worst with this regime IMO, so that's where I got the draft position from.

I honestly think we're all in on Smith and he'll be here for 5 years or so unless he gets hurt.

O.city · 03-21-2013, 10:09 AM

If they're going all I. On smith for 5 years no matter the results, we are in trouble. I don't think they will, but we will see.

If they do decide to go for a qb in the upcoming years I'd hope they trade up for the best qb instead of waitin for the 4 best to fall.

BigCatDaddy · 03-21-2013, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

I would be for taking one in the first round, it's just been proven that you don't need the 1st overall pick to get that guy anymore, even top 10.

These kids are becoming so much more prepared for the NFL than we've ever seen. Add that with the rules to protect QB's and WR's and you have a formula for success.

With the new CBA the Ben's, Flacco's and Rodgers all get pushed up to the top 10 these days.

**loochy** · 03-21-2013, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crossbow

We will win enough games to take us out of range to draft an elite QB.

Does it matter? We are in range now...

RunKC · 03-21-2013, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

If they're going all I. On smith for 5 years no matter the results, we are in trouble. I don't think they will, but we will see.

If they do decide to go for a qb in the upcoming years I'd hope they trade up for the best qb instead of waitin for the 4 best to fall.

I hope they do that. Get a QB they like ala Rodgers and have him take over after learning.

philfree · 03-21-2013, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

No doubt in my mind.

This team will win just enough games to keep us away from quarterbacks in the draft, but Alex Smith will also keep us from winning playoff games against defenses that can take away the run game and make us one dimensional.

So after all these terrible losing seasons where we've drafted top 5 four times and not drafted a QB(this draft isn't over yet) you are still worried about winning to many games because we won't be in position to draft a QB?

TEX · 03-21-2013, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

If they're going all I. On smith for 5 years no matter the results, we are in trouble. I don't think they will, but we will see.

If they do decide to go for a qb in the upcoming years I'd hope they trade up for the best qb instead of waitin for the 4 best to fall.

They won't give Smith 5 years. Reid and Dorsey wil get a QBOTF in waiting on the roster.

philfree · 03-21-2013, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

If they're going all I. On smith for 5 years no matter the results, we are in trouble. I don't think they will, but we will see.

If they do decide to go for a qb in the upcoming years I'd hope they trade up for the best qb instead of waitin for the 4 best to fall.

The best isn't always the first one picked. Was Big Ben the best one? Or Flacco? Was Rogers the best one? Was Drew Brees the best One?

RunKC · 03-21-2013, 10:24 AM

I'd take Aaron Rodgers over Big Ben, Eli or Rivers any day of the week and he wasn't in a generational class.

03-21-2013, 12:30 AM
T-post Tom Threepeat! Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Milk/Honey/Gazland Casino cash: $4347293	Words from Andy Reid . , Bag-o-dicks to the repost police. Last edited by T-post Tom; 03-21-2013 at 12:44 AM..
Posts: 20,334

03-21-2013, 09:53 AM	#20
Easy 6 pie is never free Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: the drivers seat Casino cash: $3327775	Boy, those defensive rankings were eye gougers, but i'm gonna put about 2/3 of that on an offense that consistently hung them out to dry in every game but one.
Posts: 92,111

03-21-2013, 10:09 AM	#23
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $2404064	If they're going all I. On smith for 5 years no matter the results, we are in trouble. I don't think they will, but we will see. If they do decide to go for a qb in the upcoming years I'd hope they trade up for the best qb instead of waitin for the 4 best to fall.
Posts: 81,534

03-21-2013, 10:24 AM	#30
RunKC Andy Reid Supporter Join Date: Apr 2012 Casino cash: $1859611	I'd take Aaron Rodgers over Big Ben, Eli or Rivers any day of the week and he wasn't in a generational class. __________________ Mike Greenberg@Espngreeny I can’t fathom what it must be like to be a fan of the #Chiefs. Adopt a Chief: Jared Wiley
Posts: 46,372