Should the NFL overtime rules be changed?

[Deberg_1990]

Forehead did not seem pleased.....


http://seattletimes.com/html/seahawk...post22xml.html


The winner of a classic football game should never be determined by pure, dumb luck.
Unlike the Super Bowl, the only difference Sunday between the Broncos and Seattle was a flip of the coin. “We felt like we were the better team,” Broncos defensive tackle Terrance Knighton said.

Not to take anything away from the Seahawks’ 26-20 overtime victory against Denver, but if there’s anything we’ve learned from the NFL of late, it’s this: What’s fair got to do with anything in this league? And the more the rules change, the less we trust that justice is truly being served.

After Denver rallied from a 14-point deficit in the fourth quarter on the road in the NFL’s rowdiest stadium, the silence of stunned Seahawks fans was deafening as quarterback Peyton Manning represented the Broncos on the coin flip to determine which team would get the football to begin overtime.
Manning called tails.
The Seahawks won.
NFL overtime rules are stupid.

“It puts a premium on the coin toss,” Manning said. “I called tails at the beginning of the game, and went with it again in overtime. It was heads, and it proved to be a significant call. But that’s the way it is. And you’d like to not leave it to that, leave it to get to that situation.”
Manning was forced to stand and watch as Seattle marched 80 yards for a touchdown on the opening possession of overtime. No doubt, Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson was fantastic on the game-winning drive. When a fierce 6-yard run by Marshawn Lynch gave sudden death to Denver’s remarkable comeback, Broncos linebacker Nate Irving and his defensive teammates were so emotionally stunned their feet no longer seemed to work. They stood near the goal line, nobody wanting to go home.
Did this qualify as a moral victory after the 43-8 blowout in the Super Bowl? Knighton certainly didn’t want a juice box and a condescending pat on the head. “You either win or you lose ... We’re not saying, ‘At least the score is better than the Super Bowl’ or anything like that,” Knighton insisted.

Manning has become known in Denver, thanks to imaginative T-shirt makers and excitable fans, as PFM. Maybe I’ve finally figured out what those three letters mean: Pray for miracles.
In the hands of Manning, miracles happen.
While the NFL’s most beautiful mind was stumped by the Seahawks for the vast majority of four quarters and Denver’s offensive game plan appeared so simplistic you might have wondered if it had been written in crayon, Manning willed the Broncos 80 yards in the final 59 seconds of the fourth quarter to tie the game, despite the hindrance of no timeouts to stop the clock.

Manning hit a wide-open Jacob Tamme with a 26-yard pass for the touchdown, then found Demaryius Thomas against Seattle cornerback Richard Sherman to convert the essential two points after the TD.
Prayer answered.

“That’s what makes him Peyton Manning,” said Wilson, with obvious respect for one of the NFL’s elder statesmen. “That’s what makes him one of the best quarterbacks ever to play the game.”

Then, however, Manning was forced to sit and watch overtime. Maybe NFL commissioner Roger Goodell should have bought Manning a pretzel and beer. In 2012, the league amended its overtime rules to allow each team to possess the ball at least once in the extra period, unless a touchdown is scored on the opening drive by the lucky bums who win the coin flip.
That’s stupid. Let’s simplify the rules: If the teams have fought into an overtime, haven’t both teams earned the right to touch the football at least once?

Yes, Tim Tebow gave Denver fans one of the biggest playoff thrills in franchise history by beating Pittsburgh in overtime on an 80-yard bolt from the blue.
But has Hollywood ever required Denzel Washington or Harrison Ford to sit out the last reel when things got dicey and the audience prayed for a miracle from the movie’s hero?
“We’re not going to change the rules,” said Broncos cornerback Chris Harris Jr. “But I would’ve liked our chances if we got our ‘O’ back out there.”
Fade to black.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by TribalElder

Do it like college or **** off with the changes

Oh, Hell No!

The college rules suck.

[alnorth]

No. The OT rules did need to be changed when a FG could win, but this is not a Field Goal. If you can't stop a TD, then you should lose.

The current NFL OT rules are perfect. If anything, college should change to the NFL OT rules.

[CanadianChiefs]

Imo it should be changed.

One possesion guaranteed. You can match the touchdown, but after that, a FG can win it. Defensive TD or safety still end the game immediately though. I think it would lead to some amazing, fair endings, if a team knows they have to get in the endzone to tie.

[Rain Man]

I wouldn't mind a change where they put the ball at midfield, put all 53 players onto the field from both teams, and there's only one rule. Whoever puts the ball across the other team's goal line wins. It may take a few days to have a winner, but it would be very entertaining.

[listopencil]

"No doubt, Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson was fantastic on the game-winning drive."


/end

[milkman]

I'd rather they had never introduced OT in regular season games.

[aturnis]

They've already been changed. Want your shit, hold them to a field goal.

[alnorth]

Originally Posted by CanadianChiefs

Imo it should be changed.

One possesion guaranteed. You can match the touchdown, but after that, a FG can win it. Defensive TD or safety still end the game immediately though. I think it would lead to some amazing, fair endings, if a team knows they have to get in the endzone to tie.

Why are both teams entitled to a possession? They played 4 full quarters and had plenty of chances to score again. This is a tie where neither team is really entitled to a win, and we just need a reasonable way to break the tie.

It seemed cheap when a coinflip-FG could win it, but if you can't stop a TD, then thats good enough for me to declare a winner.

[Rain Man]

I thought I read somewhere that Goodell was considering switching overtime to a punt, pass, and kick contest.

[Iconic]

You should be able to win with a field goal, so long as the other team has a chance to play offense at least once.

[tk13]

I'm definitely against using the college rules in the pros. I think the players are too good. Imagine the first time you had a 69-63 six OT game. At least what they do now is exactly what they do during the actual regulation period.

[Rain Man]

You could also put both offenses and both defenses out on the field simultaneously. Two balls, two kickoffs, and the first team that scores wins.

That would actually be really interesting to watch.

[Bambi]

Denver should have won that game. Either call it a tie at the end of regulation or let both teams have the ball.

What I saw this afternoon was a travesty.

[Why Not?]

Originally Posted by tk13

I'm definitely against using the college rules in the pros. I think the players are too good. Imagine the first time you had a 69-63 six OT game. At least what they do now is exactly what they do during the actual regulation period.

This is exactly why the NFL would never adopt the NCAA rule.

[Bambi]

Originally Posted by tk13

I'm definitely against using the college rules in the pros. I think the players are too good. Imagine the first time you had a 69-63 six OT game. At least what they do now is exactly what they do during the actual regulation period.

That doesn't happen so much anymore as now you have to go for TDs after like the 2nd round or something.