NFLPA Survey: Clark rated with an F-

[Stewie]

So, fewer than 30% of players respond to this survey and it's gospel. Gotcha.

[-King-]

Originally Posted by Stewie

So, fewer than 30% of players respond to this survey and it's gospel. Gotcha.

Where did you get 30%? Dafaces link says ~75

[Frazod]

It's not a good look at all, but I'm sure Clark gives zero ****s about how anybody other than Clark thinks he should spend his money.

[BWillie]

I can see why after this terrible Stadium renovation proposal

[HonestChieffan]

Love all things Fat Brooke writes about.

[jerryaldini]

F-:seems nuts. To get that on ownership players must have talked about it and felt very strong, because even if just a few gave it a C the average couldn't stay that low. Rarely see that on any survey because some people are positive enough to never rate that low

[BWillie]

Originally Posted by jerryaldini

F-:seems nuts. To get that on ownership players must have talked about it and felt very strong, because even if just a few gave it a C the average couldn't stay that low. Rarely see that on any survey because some people are positive enough to never rate that low

How big of a chode do you have to be to get an F- from the players? It has to be more than just not making a new locker room.

[stevieray]

Originally Posted by BWillie

How big of a chode do you have to be to get an F- from the players? .

....don't let the door hit you on the way out.

[Hammock Parties]

NFLPA is full of karens with dreads

That’s not true. Plus culture and amenities are VASTLY different concepts. If the money is even then it comes down to personal preference between: recent success, coaching staff, city, friends on the team. At no point does the quality of the locker room decide where a FA goes. https://t.co/fOQB854SoO

— Mitchell Schwartz (@MitchSchwartz71) February 29, 2024

[DaFace]

It also sounds like they asked them to give ratings in a 0 to 100 scale. On that type of scale, the tendency is to think of 50 as average, not an F.

It seems like the survey helps to identify the teams that are generally better or worse, but framing it as a letter grade almost certainly makes it all seem worse than it actually is.

[jerryaldini]

Originally Posted by DaFace

It also sounds like they asked them to give ratings in a 0 to 100 scale. On that type of scale, the tendency is to think of 50 as average, not an F.

It seems like the survey helps to identify the teams that are generally better or worse, but framing it as a letter grade almost certainly makes it all seem worse than it actually is.

Ah that makes a lot more sense. I noticed the Chiefs rank about average on family, but the grade is only a D+. The F- is probably around a 50, which isn't that big of a deal. No way the whole team is giving Hunt a F-. This is really bad misrepresentation.

[BigRedChief]

Reports are saying the low locker room grades are for the training facility not the one at Arrowhead.

[ChiefsFanatic]

I don't remember the time line. Didn't Hunt talk about upgrades before the Royals started this entire stadium saga?

Maybe he put upgrades on hold because he was anticipating putting a new practice facility where the K stands now.

[Imon Yourside]

If this is what we have to complain about after back to back Trophies I guess we can probably be ok.

[PunkinDrublic]

I live less than 5 minutes from the Cowboys state of the art facilities in Frisco. They are without a doubt top of the line and Jerry spared no expense but at the end of the day they still overspend on FA and don’t draft quite well enough to be above mid. You play to win championships not meaningless award winning facilities.