|
02-26-2013, 12:38 PM | #2026 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $1564064
|
|
Posts: 82,261
|
02-26-2013, 12:39 PM | #2027 |
Training Camp Hero
Join Date: Oct 2006
Casino cash: $8494801
|
|
Posts: 5,997
|
02-26-2013, 12:40 PM | #2028 | |
I'm done Chiefs, Go Pack Go
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Iowa
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 2,008
|
02-26-2013, 12:40 PM | #2029 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Central Kansas
Casino cash: $3550201
|
Quote:
Oh, you mean like the 49ers are trying to do right now..... |
|
Posts: 10,723
|
02-26-2013, 12:40 PM | #2030 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
With my belief that the Chiefs will eventually evolve into a 43D I was warming up to a 34-DE/43-DT type (and a QB in the 2nd round). And the only one who seemed to be close to the top pick value there was Star Lotilelei. But of course he may never get even drafted now. |
|
Posts: 26,959
|
02-26-2013, 12:41 PM | #2031 | |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
Casino cash: $2555047
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 92,316
|
02-26-2013, 12:42 PM | #2032 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $1564064
|
Quote:
Why you think they transition to a 43 baffles me. They just brought in a 34 D coordinator and basically said they are staying with the 34. But ok. |
|
Posts: 82,261
|
02-26-2013, 12:42 PM | #2033 |
Training Camp Hero
Join Date: Oct 2006
Casino cash: $8494801
|
So what happens to our outstanding rt? Do some research before u come here and try and.talk about our team. You obviously know nothing and are coming across as painfully dumb
|
Posts: 5,997
|
02-26-2013, 12:42 PM | #2034 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 26,959
|
02-26-2013, 12:43 PM | #2035 | |
I'm done Chiefs, Go Pack Go
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Iowa
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 2,008
|
02-26-2013, 12:44 PM | #2036 |
Needs more middle fingers
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Casino cash: $3133063
|
???
Do you remember anything about that draft at all? Aaron Rodgers was suppose to have been a top 5 pick. Thanks to the system he played in, teams viewed him as "risky". So what turned out to be more risky? Passing on or taking Aaron Rodgers? This isn't hard. |
Posts: 65,603
|
02-26-2013, 12:46 PM | #2037 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
I honestly think at least one of them would have panned out if a stubborn Marty hadn't glued their behinds to the bench for years. He totally ignored developing them. I think he was pulling a bit of Haley-vs-Piolli on Peterson.
|
Posts: 26,959
|
02-26-2013, 12:46 PM | #2038 |
Needs more middle fingers
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Casino cash: $3133063
|
"An NFL source tells the Arizona Republic that the Cardinals are "exploring the possibility" of trading for Alex Smith.
Per the source, "no deal is in place." That means the Cardinals are not the team that was previously reported to have a deal effectively done with the Niners. That team was likely the Chiefs, but that doesn't mean San Francisco will stop shopping Smith around ahead of the league's new year on March 12. By pitting teams against each other, they can maximize the haul they'll get for their former starting quarterback." please Cardinals, PLEASE do it. He's exactly what you need! |
Posts: 65,603
|
02-26-2013, 12:47 PM | #2039 |
Beloved & Awesome CP Celebrity
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Florida
Casino cash: $6584952
|
Frankie lives in imaginary Frankie-land where you can't compare Alex Smith to other failed #1 draft picks or to Matt Cassel, where the Chiefs are switching to a 43, and where Geno Smith isn't worth a top draft choice but Star Lululemon is.
__________________
|
Posts: 35,703
|
02-26-2013, 12:47 PM | #2040 | |
Starter
Join Date: Feb 2013
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
I think we are just never going to agree. I've been a 49er fan for a long time and I've seen a number of GMs come through. I've seen some really good ones (Baalke is really good) and some really bad ones (Terry Donahue...the name makes me sick). The one thing that the good ones have in common is that they move around alot moving both up and down in the draft, they aquire lots of picks (The Niners may have as many as 15 in April), and they seem to simply understand the process better. They don't reach. They don't marry themselves to any ONE player. If they miss out on one guy they have a backup plan.They measure the difference between the guy they want and the guy they may have to settle for and take risks accordingly. The Kaep assertion...the 49er were pretty sure that nobody was going to take him in round one....but they did investigate trades to move up that far and were unsuccessful. They tried to move up to the top pick of the second round and were unsuccessful. They stuck with it and got their guy. Did they view Kaep as a can't miss prospect? No. They really liked him though and thought he had huge potential. He was the guy they wanted and a second round pick is good for a more risky player. They knew tho that Aldon Smith wouldn't be in striking distance of that second round pick...so they selected him at 7. How has Ponder worked out in Minn? Locker in Tenn? Those were REACHES. If the Chiefs really think that Geno is worthy of that pick...don't worry...they'll pick him. I just don't think they do. |
|
Posts: 152
|
|
|