|
02-21-2013, 06:12 AM | |
Prestige Worldwide
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spring Hill, KS
Casino cash: $1880526
|
***Official Trade for Nick Foles Thread***
Because this shit is like herpes....
Give up our 3rd for this guy. We all know Chiefs don't draft QB's in the early rounds...we trade for backups. *Edit* http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/7475/nick-foles ESPN's Chris Mortensen stated on NFL 32 Thursday that he believes Nick Foles could be acquired for a third-round pick. Foles-to-Kansas City is the obvious connection because Andy Reid drafted Foles and the Chiefs need a quarterback. (Desperately.) "I do believe there is some substance to the desire to talk to the Eagles about Nick Foles," said Mort. "I think it'd take probably a third-rounder to get Foles. So I wouldn't close the door on that." In an ideal world, the Chiefs could acquire Foles for a third-rounder, re-sign Dwayne Bowe, and perhaps draft Luke Joeckel at No. 1 overall. Feb 21 - 5:23 PM Last edited by Mr_Tomahawk; 02-21-2013 at 04:33 PM.. |
Posts: 18,454
|
03-12-2013, 12:08 PM | #181 |
Prestige Worldwide
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spring Hill, KS
Casino cash: $1880526
|
Not necessarily at #1...they are nervous the raiders will take him at #3, so theoretically they could trade up to #2 assuming we pass on him...
__________________
Adopt-A-Chief: John Dorsey
|
Posts: 18,454
|
03-12-2013, 12:09 PM | #182 |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
Casino cash: $494088
|
We better not move down with a team that wants a QB for less than full price.
Going from 1 to 4 is a 1200 point difference, basically the 12th overall pick worth of point value. They would need to give us 4, Foles and next years first to make that deal. Minimum. Otherwise, we better just take Geno and go into the season with a "let the best man win" mentality. |
Posts: 47,398
|
03-12-2013, 12:12 PM | #183 | |
Prestige Worldwide
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spring Hill, KS
Casino cash: $1880526
|
Quote:
__________________
Adopt-A-Chief: John Dorsey
|
|
Posts: 18,454
|
03-12-2013, 12:14 PM | #184 |
Go Beavers!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Warshington
Casino cash: $5058243
|
|
Posts: 14,504
|
03-12-2013, 12:16 PM | #185 |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
Casino cash: $494088
|
Almost every deal from the 2012 draft used the chart as a guideline...the only ones that didn't had multiple teams interested that caused the cost to rise...like the RG3 trade.
|
Posts: 47,398
|
03-12-2013, 12:42 PM | #186 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
We will NOT get the draft chart dictated compensation. It's just not that kind of a draft. There's simply no elite player at the top of the draft. Almost anything in extra picks (or Foles) we get from the Eagles is a bonus. And we still get one of several players that I'm sure the Chiefs hold virtually equal in value. We don't know how hard the Eagles' chubby is for Geno, but if it is even semi hard it's a win win trade for both parties. And we are NOT taking Geno at the top unless the AS trade was bogus or Geno is drafted to be traded. |
|
Posts: 26,959
|
03-12-2013, 12:52 PM | #187 | |
DT CARD COLLECTOR
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ManCave
Casino cash: $10005837
|
Quote:
Smith/Foles/Daniels is probably a better outlook than Cassel/Quinn/Stanzi. But probably not THE answer.
__________________
667 Different DT cards and counting |
|
Posts: 7,574
|
03-12-2013, 12:58 PM | #188 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
This sounds reasonable to me. And their interest in Geno Smith makes sense too. One year of Vick while they groom Geno. And Foles seems to be a square peg in the round hole that's Kelly's system.
|
Posts: 26,959
|
03-12-2013, 01:26 PM | #189 | |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
Casino cash: $494088
|
Quote:
Who gives a **** what Kiper and McShay talk about? If the Eagles (or another team) want Geno Smith, they are gonna have to pay for the pick. The real question is if teams want a QB bad enough to ove for him, what do they see that Reid/Dorsey don't? |
|
Posts: 47,398
|
03-12-2013, 01:32 PM | #190 |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
Casino cash: $2555047
|
So it's ok for the Eagles to groom Geno for a year but it isn't ok for us?
|
Posts: 92,316
|
03-12-2013, 01:50 PM | #191 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
You respond with condescension, yet you haven't earned the right. You obviously don't know the first thing about making deals. It's not only based on supply and demand, but also the degree of the demand. It's not in black or white. It's not like the Eagles either want Geno or they don't. They may very well want him enough, but not for an arm and a leg. |
|
Posts: 26,959
|
03-12-2013, 01:51 PM | #192 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
|
Posts: 26,959
|
03-12-2013, 01:57 PM | #193 | |
MVP
Join Date: Dec 2012
Casino cash: $10004980
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 5,994
|
03-13-2013, 07:40 AM | #194 |
'Tis my eye!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
Casino cash: $10229900
|
|
Posts: 100,036
|
03-13-2013, 09:21 AM | #195 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
No. What I meant was FOs evaluates a draft prospect using different parameters. It's true among us. Why shouldn't it be the same among them. You, for example are certain beyond any shadow of doubt that Geno Smith is the next super elite, carry-the-franchise-on-his-shoulders QB. I don't see it. I bet most FOs don't see it that way either. But 'most' does not mean 'all.' And there lies our chance, albeit small, to pull off a trade down.
|
Posts: 26,959
|
|
|