|
|
05-03-2013, 09:58 PM | #1 |
Kindness in words...
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Zion
Casino cash: $10025483
|
There are no elite OT's in this draft either.
Fisher or Joeckel aren't Okung or Thomas, by any stretch of the imagination. Hell, if either Matthews or Lewan came out, both Joeckel and Fisher most likely would have been picked after both players. Just because we picked one #1 doesn't mean that this guy is going to be a world beater. Personally, I think he's going to have a tough time beating out either Albert or Stephenson and I believe we just drafted a back up - at least for this year depending upon what they end up doing with Albert. If they sign Albert long term for decent money, I think he slides inside. And I think he might do that anyway under the franchise tag this season - and if he's asked to do such a thing, he might be so pissed about it that he just holds out for the season. It remains to be seen if Fisher is capable of adapting to the next level. The Senior Bowl doesn't mean jack squat in terms of long term production at the next level (see Ryan Sims), and that's basically what they drafted Fisher off of. We'll see real quick as he'll be going against Hali and Houston. They'll most likely want Fisher at LT simply because of draft status and money. As well, Albert still hasn't mastered the position in terms of technique. To protect him in his rookie year, they'll want Albert at LG. I'm pretty sure that there is no way that Asamoah beats out Schwartz at RG (Asamoah has underperformed so far in his career) and Stephenson is going to be entrenched at RT by the start of the season. Hudson is a lock at C. |
Posts: 15,450
|
05-03-2013, 10:20 PM | #2 |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2013
Casino cash: $4219883
|
Unfortunately, a large number of NFL scouts disagree with you.
While no one is claiming Orlando Pace or Jonathan Ogden was in this draft, there certainly was and is 'elite' potential at the Tackle position. There's a reason 3 of the first 4 picks were tackles and many other teams said those were the top guys on their draft boards. It may not be 'sexy', but it is reality . . . |
Posts: 9,305
|
05-03-2013, 10:31 PM | #3 | |
Kindness in words...
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Zion
Casino cash: $10025483
|
Quote:
I've heard it mentioned many times that these guys were late first rounders at best in any other draft. Chiefs picked Fisher due to the situation with Albert. Period. Very reminiscent of the pick of Baldwin. We had absolutely nobody behind Bowe and were forced to pick Baldwin at that spot. Albert was franchised and being shopped. Chiefs thought that they had the deal done with Miami. They were going to take either Fisher or Joeckel no matter what. However, the Albert trade imploded on them and now they are stuck with a disgruntled Albert and a 1.1 who is looking at being the backup tackle on the team for the 2013 season. Fisher was a FBS player with good measurable who had a good Senior Bowl. That's it. He wasn't an Okung or Thomas or guys like that who had not only the elite measurables but also the reps at the position in a major BCS conference against top pass rushers. The guy is a complete question mark at this point and I seriously doubt that he's going to beat out either Albert or Stephenson for either tackle spot in 2013 unless the Chiefs move Albert to LG and if they try it, I'm thinking that Albert holds out. |
|
Posts: 15,450
|
05-03-2013, 10:47 PM | #4 |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2013
Casino cash: $4219883
|
No, it doesn't. But most NFL scouts (guys that get paid lots of $$$$$ to do this for a living) thought the elite 'potential' existed at the Tackle spot, whereas almost all scouts across the board thought the 'potential' of the QB class was weak.
Don't believe me? Look at the results of the draft . . . . |
Posts: 9,305
|
05-03-2013, 10:34 PM | #5 | |
Unsparing
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
|
Posts: 77,135
|
|
|