|
|
|
|
03-29-2013, 03:18 PM
|
#1 | |
|
▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓
Join Date: Jan 2009
Casino cash: $1965743
|
Quote:
__________________
🏁 |
|
|
Posts: 63,923
  |
|
|
03-29-2013, 03:40 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Permitted
Join Date: Jul 2011
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
If I want a QB that wins, it's not Romo. |
|
|
Posts: 4,095
|
|
|
03-29-2013, 03:43 PM
|
#3 | |
|
GBM 8-12-15
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dayton, Oh.
Casino cash: $10052154
|
Quote:
Why would anyone ever take a 33 yr old with 1 playoff win over a 28 yr old with 9 wins including a SB? |
|
|
Posts: 59,997
|
|
|
03-29-2013, 03:47 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
Casino cash: $2489099
|
Quote:
{clicksnapwhistlegrunt}
__________________
"If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..." "When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags." |
|
|
Posts: 60,951
|
|
|
03-29-2013, 03:53 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
During my infamous Manning/Brady arguments, I could make any point in the world and it would just lead back to Tom: 3 Peyton: 1. Eli is better than his brother because he has 2 to Peyton's 1. You know, nevermind the fact that he was a dropped Samuel INT, a helmet catch on a play that probably should have been whistled dead as a sack, a Welker drop, and a Manningham "wtf really?" catch away from being 0-2 in the Super Bowl and labeled, yep, you guessed it! ANOTHER MANNING CHOKER! So because Eli LITERALLY got 5 amazing bounces in Super Bowls where he had Brett Favre launch a 40 yard INT punt for no reason in the first NFCCG and Kyle Williams in the 2nd NFCCG as well... because of that he is SUPER CLUTCH and THE BETTER MANNING...even though he's like the bizarro Marty Schottenheimer when it comes to postseason luck. Critical thinking doesn't happen on this board. Dallas hates Romo, media loves Dallas, media trolls Romo news, casual fan jumps on the bandwagon and agrees that "Romo sucks because Romo chokes." Thinking for ones self doesn't occur often on this board. |
|
|
Posts: 56,356
  |
|
|
03-29-2013, 03:49 PM
|
#6 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
Peyton Manning is always the key to his team winning in the postseason. Tom Brady is always the key to his team winning in the postseason. Tony Romo is always the key to his team winning in the postseason. Aaron Rodgers is always the key to his team winning in the postseason. Before this season, Joe Flacco and Mark Sanchez WERE NEVER the key to their teams winning in the postseason. Now, their play in some games ended up being the key...but going into the game, no one said "this is Joe Flacco's team! This is Flacco's game to win!" No. Those two simply were instructed to manage the games and not **** up. So just because they were surrounded with tremendous defenses and not given the responsibilities of elite QB's like Manning and Brady doesn't mean because they won those games that their playoff record is an indicator of what kind of caliber QB they are... and unfortunately the casual fan dipshits on this board don't understand that In order for Manning to win in the postseason, he has to play 100% up to Peyton Manning standards. Peyton Manning standards are much, much, much, much higher than Joe Flacco standards. The only argument for Peyton being a choker is Peyton not ever playing up to Peyton in the playoffs. The reason why I can't call him a choker is because it's not his fault that 80% Peyton Manning isn't good enough when 80% Peyton Manning would still be better than 99% of the QB's to ever play the game. |
|
|
Posts: 56,356
|
|
|
|
|
ROMO gets his $$$
Hybrid Mode
