The "IF no QB with the 1st pick" poll

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by O.city

Its funny, it's like anytime someone on here says something positive about Geno, RunKC's blood boils just a little bit more. He really leads the anyone but geno clan.

And anytime someone says something bad about Geno you turn into eeyore and say we should just sign Alex Smith because no QB is worth a first.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by RunKC

And anytime someone says something bad about Geno you turn into eeyore and say we should just sign Alex Smith because no QB is worth a first.

Sure when someone suggests we take the fifth best qb in this class which is supposedly a weak qb class an take a lt at one, doing what the franchise has always done, I tend to get aggravated.



Still haven't figured out your geno hate but I'll get there

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by O.city

Sure when someone suggests we take the fifth best qb in this class which is supposedly a weak qb class an take a lt at one, doing what the franchise has always done, I tend to get aggravated.



Still haven't figured out your geno hate but I'll get there

I don't hate him. I just think the questions are justified. Locks onto first read all the time, throws into double coverage by far more than any QB in the draft, not as great of a downfield thrower as people claim and his antics bother me.

I do like him more than Barkley and Glennon though.

Wilson, Nassib, Geno. That's my preference.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by RunKC

I don't hate him. I just think the questions are justified. Locks onto first read all the time, throws into double coverage by far more than any QB in the draft, not as great of a downfield thrower as people claim and his antics bother me.

I do like him more than Barkley and Glennon though.

Wilson, Nassib, Geno. That's my preference.

"Locks onto to first read" is not actually true.

He usually goes to his first read because that guy is open, but he has shown, again and again, and again, the ability to go through progressions when necessary.

But of it isn't necessary, why do it?

Just to make people like you happy?

[Frankie]

Originally Posted by milkman

"Locks onto to first read" is not actually true.

He usually goes to his first read because that guy is open, but he has shown, again and again, and again, the ability to go through progressions when necessary.

But of it isn't necessary, why do it?

Just to make people like you happy?

AND (DRUMROLLS) finally there is something milkman posted that is reason based.

I add that about half the time the best QBs also go with the firsts read and don't bother with the other reads as the first is immediately available to them. I watched Manning, Brady, Rodgers, Kaepernick especially with that in mind, this post season, and found the "locking' onto the first read was amazingly prevalent with those guys. More so than I originally thought.

[Frankie]

Originally Posted by O.city

Sure when someone suggests we take the fifth best qb in this class which is supposedly a weak qb class an take a lt at one, doing what the franchise has always done, I tend to get aggravated.

Unless there's not that much daylight between the 1st and the 5th best. Which may or may not be the case this year. I guess the combine will clear a lot of this up.

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Originally Posted by Frankie

Unless there's not that much daylight between the 1st and the 5th best. Which may or may not be the case this year. I guess the combine will clear a lot of this up.

Their is a chasm between 1 and 5. Don't need the combine to see that.