|
|
02-03-2013, 01:10 PM | #1 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
that's one game that got WAY out of hand. I agree with you. The Hawks are WAY more talented than the Colts. ESPECIALLY on defense. The Hawks were NEVER in position for the entire year to have to break off gameplan and go into PASS mode. So just because the Colts were always in pass mode for a coach who is a pass heavy coach...Luck is better because he threw SO many more passes? Why? What? Doesn't make any sense. Anybody who watched Russell Wilson for the last two months and wasn't impressed is insane. If you want to argue that Luck is more talented than Wilson be my guest. That's a totally valid argument. 100% valid. He was not better in 2012, though. He wasn't a better passer. He just wasn't. By STARTING NFL QB metric (and not factoring in the fact he was a rookie) he was MEDIOCRE this year. Plain and simple. He was mediocre and was clutch in crunch time. That's how you can define Luck's 2012. |
|
Posts: 56,356
|
02-03-2013, 01:12 PM | #2 |
Masochist/Chiefs Fan
Join Date: Dec 2009
Casino cash: $10004925
|
Exactly. If you want to talk stats, put Luck's stats next to Tannehill's stats and make a case that Luck was better.
__________________
My weekly NFL Podcast on iTunes |
Posts: 723
|
|
|