How many games will Tyreek Hill be suspended?

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by YontsRBake

2 for the audio recording.

I still don’t understand this line of thinking. The audio recording is meaningless.

[Chief Roundup]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

I still don’t understand this line of thinking. The audio recording is meaningless.

It is not a "line of thinking". It is the rules and the way it is and has been used on players before.

https://static.nfl.com/static/conten...0000828506.pdf

Personal Conduct PolicyLeague Policies for Players | 2016 Expectations and Standards of Conduct

It is not enough simply to avoid being found guilty of a crime. We are all held to a higher standard and must conduct ourselves in a way that is responsible, promotes the values of the NFL, and is lawful. Players convicted of a crime or subject to a disposition of a criminal proceeding(as defined in this Policy)are subject to discipline. But even if the conduct does not result in a criminal conviction, players found to have engaged in any of the following conduct will be subject to discipline.
Prohibited conduct includes but is not limited to the following:
Actual or threatened physical violence against another person, including dating violence, domestic violence, child abuse, and other forms of family violence;
Stalking, harassment, or similar forms of intimidation;
Conduct that poses a genuine danger to the safety and well-being of another person;
Conduct that undermines or puts at risk the integrity of the NFL, NFL clubs, or NFL personnel.

Hope this helps. This is not the complete list of rules but it is the ones that I thought could or might be used against Hill in this situation.

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

It is not a "line of thinking". It is the rules and the way it is and has been used on players before.

https://static.nfl.com/static/conten...0000828506.pdf

Personal Conduct PolicyLeague Policies for Players | 2016 Expectations and Standards of Conduct

It is not enough simply to avoid being found guilty of a crime. We are all held to a higher standard and must conduct ourselves in a way that is responsible, promotes the values of the NFL, and is lawful. Players convicted of a crime or subject to a disposition of a criminal proceeding(as defined in this Policy)are subject to discipline. But even if the conduct does not result in a criminal conviction, players found to have engaged in any of the following conduct will be subject to discipline.
Prohibited conduct includes but is not limited to the following:
Actual or threatened physical violence against another person, including dating violence, domestic violence, child abuse, and other forms of family violence;
Stalking, harassment, or similar forms of intimidation;
Conduct that poses a genuine danger to the safety and well-being of another person;
Conduct that undermines or puts at risk the integrity of the NFL, NFL clubs, or NFL personnel.

Hope this helps. This is not the complete list of rules but it is the ones that I thought could or might be used against Hill in this situation.

Which of those has he done?

[Chief Roundup]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

Which of those has he done?

OMG really. I think you are just trolling or need to go do some research about what all has transpired.

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

OMG really. I think you are just trolling or need to go do some research about what all has transpired.

Perhaps I'm mis-remembering, but I don't recall evidence for any of those.

[Chief Roundup]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

Perhaps I'm mis-remembering, but I don't recall evidence for any of those.

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

It is not a "line of thinking". It is the rules and the way it is and has been used on players before.

https://static.nfl.com/static/conten...0000828506.pdf

Personal Conduct PolicyLeague Policies for Players | 2016 Expectations and Standards of Conduct

It is not enough simply to avoid being found guilty of a crime. We are all held to a higher standard and must conduct ourselves in a way that is responsible, promotes the values of the NFL, and is lawful. Players convicted of a crime or subject to a disposition of a criminal proceeding(as defined in this Policy)are subject to discipline. But even if the conduct does not result in a criminal conviction, players found to have engaged in any of the following conduct will be subject to discipline.
Prohibited conduct includes but is not limited to the following:
Actual or threatened physical violence against another person, including dating violence, domestic violence, child abuse, and other forms of family violence;
Stalking, harassment, or similar forms of intimidation;
Conduct that poses a genuine danger to the safety and well-being of another person;
Conduct that undermines or puts at risk the integrity of the NFL, NFL clubs, or NFL personnel.

Hope this helps. This is not the complete list of rules but it is the ones that I thought could or might be used against Hill in this situation.

Not trying to say that I am correct. Just my perception up to this point.
Tyreek was subject to a deposition by the Overland Park PD and CFS.
The audio recording is at a minimum a form of intimidation. If it is viewed that way then that is conduct that undermines the integrity of the NFL and the Chiefs. With all players being held to a higher standard per the Conduct policy he will be punished by the NFL.
Now how far does someone, Goodell, want to go in all of this.
Some might say that punching his kid in the chest to help toughen him up and admitting that your 3 yr old is terrified of you might/could be seen as child abuse. Does someone want to say that the audio recording is not just a form of intimidation but is also a threat of violence because in the context of that conversation those two were talking about the breaking of an arm.

We will find out eventually how the NFL and Goodell views this situation in its entirety.

[Halfcan]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

Not trying to say that I am correct. Just my perception up to this point.
Tyreek was subject to a deposition by the Overland Park PD and CFS.
The audio recording is at a minimum a form of intimidation. If it is viewed that way then that is conduct that undermines the integrity of the NFL and the Chiefs. With all players being held to a higher standard per the Conduct policy he will be punished by the NFL.
Now how far does someone, Goodell, want to go in all of this.
Some might say that punching his kid in the chest to help toughen him up and admitting that your 3 yr old is terrified of you might/could be seen as child abuse. Does someone want to say that the audio recording is not just a form of intimidation but is also a threat of violence because in the context of that conversation those two were talking about the breaking of an arm.

We will find out eventually how the NFL and Goodell views this situation in its entirety.

You are putting a lot of faith in a secret, illegal blackmail tape. A tape that we have not heard all of, only a snippet, edited for full effect. What if two minutes before that "threat" by Reek- they were both laughing and joking around? Or maybe after the edit- she admits that she lied to police? We don't know what else was on the Blackmail tape, because it was used for an agenda to shame and paint Reek in the worst light. An agenda that is still working against him.

[YontsRBake]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

I still don’t understand this line of thinking. The audio recording is meaningless.

I don’t disagree in terms of the legal system and overall meaning, but in 2019 the NFL has a strong PC standard to live up to in terms of PR. I hope it’s 0, I just feel like the media will get on Goodells ass and he’ll cave on 2 games.