|
01-11-2010, 01:24 PM | |
Take a Chill Pill
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Carolina
Casino cash: $7649900
|
Star Trek 12 Gets Release Date
I'm not sure if its Star Trek 12 or Star Trek 2, but the release date is June 29, 2012.
http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2010/01/11...-nothing-else/ UPDATE: Paramount has confirmed to MTV that the projected release date for the "Star Trek" sequel is indeed June 29, 2012. This counts as news, but there's not much to it. We all know there's a "Star Trek" sequel coming. Hell, Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci, writers/producers of the May reboot, were talking about sequel possibilities as far back as the week after the first movie came out. Now we have a date to pin our hopes to: June 29, 2012. Nothing else is known or announced, so don't ask. Maybe director J.J. Abrams will return to helm the sequel, maybe he won't. Maybe Khan will be the villain, maybe not. For all we know, the plan is to give us an epic "Star Trek Meets Star Wars" crossover. Could happen, right? The news comes from a variety of sources, including Ain't It Cool News and Box Office Mojo, but there's no Paramount-issued press release that I can find. The information ran through some trustworthy sources, but we've yet to receive comment from the studio directly. Regardless, there really hasn't ever been any doubt that we'd be seeing more "Star Trek." Abrams' take on the series made it friendly to an entirely new, much wider audience than its ever known before. Were you anything less than certain that a "Star Trek" sequel was coming eventually? Where would you like the story to go from where it is now? Any specific hopes for the sequel? |
Posts: 44,565
|
05-28-2013, 03:31 PM | #796 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
|
Posts: 88,960
|
05-28-2013, 03:31 PM | #797 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
That's what they're doing with the new animated series (supposedly, anyway).
|
Posts: 88,960
|
05-28-2013, 03:40 PM | #798 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Antonio Tx.
Casino cash: $2154454
|
Heh, i liked National Treasure and Sorcerors Apprentice
__________________
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning: Matt once made a very nice play in Seattle where he spun away from a pass rusher and hit Bowe off his back foot for a first down. One of the best plays Matt has ever made. |
Posts: 66,914
|
05-28-2013, 03:41 PM | #799 |
I'll be back.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $2850478
|
__________________
Chiefs game films |
Posts: 288,100
|
05-28-2013, 03:45 PM | #800 |
21st Century Schizoid Fan
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Gates of Delirium
Casino cash: $684950
|
|
Posts: 70,281
|
05-28-2013, 03:48 PM | #801 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
National Treasure was decent but the sequel was pretty awful and ruined any chance of a "franchise". I didn't see Sorcerer's Apprentice but the idea of Nic Cage as a Sorcerer? Plus, I don't think special effects are his thing and he's too much of a "feel good" type of director for something like Star Wars. IMO, the names in the mix should be Brad Bird, Andrew Stanton, Matthew Vaughn and even Gore Verbinski, who did quite well with Rango. |
Posts: 88,960
|
05-28-2013, 03:51 PM | #802 |
I'll be back.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $2850478
|
So, the movie has made $70 million at this point.
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=startrek12.htm Why is this bad, again?
__________________
Chiefs game films |
Posts: 288,100
|
05-28-2013, 03:54 PM | #803 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 88,960
|
05-28-2013, 03:55 PM | #804 | |
Shaken. Not stirred.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London
Casino cash: $13020126
VARSITY
|
Quote:
__________________
My dear girl, there are some things that just aren’t done. Such as, drinking Dom Perignon ’53 above the temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit. That’s just as bad as listening to the Beatles without earmuffs. |
|
Posts: 65,646
|
05-28-2013, 03:56 PM | #805 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
|
Posts: 88,960
|
05-28-2013, 03:57 PM | #806 |
I'll be back.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $2850478
|
It's only been out 12 days.
__________________
Chiefs game films |
Posts: 288,100
|
05-28-2013, 03:58 PM | #807 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
|
Posts: 88,960
|
05-28-2013, 04:06 PM | #808 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Antonio Tx.
Casino cash: $2154454
|
Yea, it appears there was no audience growth. Star Trek = limited female and under 21 appeal.
__________________
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning: Matt once made a very nice play in Seattle where he spun away from a pass rusher and hit Bowe off his back foot for a first down. One of the best plays Matt has ever made. |
Posts: 66,914
|
05-28-2013, 04:08 PM | #809 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Antonio Tx.
Casino cash: $2154454
|
Summer Movies are extremely front loaded now days. I'm sure Dane can break down the numbers better but most movies make about 75% of their total gross in the first few weeks.
__________________
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning: Matt once made a very nice play in Seattle where he spun away from a pass rusher and hit Bowe off his back foot for a first down. One of the best plays Matt has ever made. |
Posts: 66,914
|
05-28-2013, 04:10 PM | #810 |
oxymoron
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: OP/KC/Whatever
Casino cash: $9556299
|
Calling it "Into Darkness" was probably a misstep as well. The people who would buy into a title like that were already going to see it. Not that Star Trek: Vengeance would have been any better. Either way, it's a bit of a gloomy title for a summer popcorn flick. Not to mention that it just sounds goofy.
|
Posts: 58,682
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|