Chris Conley Vs Demarcus Robinson

[UChieffyBugger]

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale

In what way does he have more potential?

You say athletically, but that's not even close. Conley is objectively bigger, faster, jumps higher, ect.

I'm not particularly high on either guy... but Robinson had his chance last season and essentially shit the bed with his barely 50% catch rate (compared to Conley's 68%), multiple drops in few attempts, ect. Put it this way.

Conley needed 16 passes thrown his way to get 175 yards on 11 catches

Robinson had 39 passes thrown his way for 212 yards on 21 catches... 10.1 YPC.

I don't see where you're getting this. The eye test says Conley is a better athlete (as well as the combine) and he's more productive.

What do you like about Robinson?

I can show you evidence actually. HERE is where the drive started against the Titans when he got his TD. I caught four balls in that drive on the left, middle and right-hand side of the field. And all of them he got separation with the last catch coming after he dodged a jam and juked another defender.

And In THIS preseason game against the Titans he made three big catches too.

Now, show me evidence that Conley has this sort of elusiveness, separation and catching skills in his arsenal!!!..I'd love to see it.

[WhiteWhale]

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger

I can show you evidence actually. HERE is where the drive started against the Titans when he got his TD. I caught four balls in that drive on the left, middle and right-hand side of the field. And all of them he got separation with the last catch coming after he dodged a jam and juked another defender.

And In THIS preseason game against the Titans he made three big catches too.

Now, show me evidence that Conley has this sort of elusiveness, separation and catching skills in his arsenal!!!..I'd love to see it.

Is that you Demarcus?

[notorious]

Conley is the better athlete, but my eyes tell me that Robinson is the more natural football player.

This is a good problem to have.

[UChieffyBugger]

Originally Posted by notorious

Conley is the better athlete, but my eyes tell me that Robinson is the more natural football player.

This is a good problem to have.

BINGO!!!..but some folks seem to think we're talking about track and field here so football skills don't matter .

[WhiteWhale]

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger

BINGO!!!..but some folks seem to think we're talking about track and field here so football skills don't matter .

You said Robinson was more athletic. People are just pointing out you are wrong.

My primary argument was production and efficiency... which you countered by cherry picking a few plays.

[UChieffyBugger]

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale

You said Robinson was more athletic. People are just pointing out you are wrong.

My primary argument was production and efficiency... which you countered by cherry picking a few plays.

No I didn't, I said he was more elusive and quicker over short distances. Which happens to be the exact sort of skills needed to play the slot.

[WhiteWhale]

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger

No I didn't, I said he was more elusive and quicker over short distances. Which happens to be the exact sort of skills needed to play the slot.

Hmmm, I gotta own that.

You're right. Their combine times back it up with the 3 cone and shuttle drills. He's got better COD skills.

[ToxSocks]

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale

Is that you Demarcus?

AH-HA!

[Halfcan]

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger

I can show you evidence actually. HERE is where the drive started against the Titans when he got his TD. I caught four balls in that drive on the left, middle and right-hand side of the field. And all of them he got separation with the last catch coming after he dodged a jam and juked another defender.

And In THIS preseason game against the Titans he made three big catches too.

Now, show me evidence that Conley has this sort of elusiveness, separation and catching skills in his arsenal!!!..I'd love to see it.

Interesting slip of the tongue there.