|
|
View Poll Results: If no QB then who? | |||
LT Luke Joekel |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
40 | 31.01% |
DE Star Lotulelei |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
30 | 23.26% |
LB Jarvis Jones |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 14.73% |
Other (who, why?) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
40 | 31.01% |
Voters: 129. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
Topic Starter |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
The "IF no QB with the 1st pick" poll
Scenario (hypothetical):
It has become obvious that the Chiefs will pass on a QB with the top pick and will address the QB need (a) later in round 1, (b) in round 2, or (c) by signing a veteran. No trade down is planned either. There seems to be the following three names on top of the draft. Among these three which one would you want the Chiefs to use their 1st pick on: 1- LT Luke Joekel (meaning Albert will walk) 2- DE Star Lotulelei (meaning T-Jax will be cut) 3- Jarvis Jones (meaning we are thinking transition to 43 soon) 4- Other (name and explain) KEEP IN MIND This is not a Geno Smith, Tyler Wilson discussion. Keep that argument in the hundreds of other threads about it. This is about IF WE DON'T PICK A QB AT THE TOP! Just curious to know which of the picks mentioned makes more sense compared to the others IYO. If you are a staunch Geno fan, for example, this does not paint you as a traitor to the cause. |
Posts: 26,959
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Prestige Worldwide
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spring Hill, KS
Casino cash: $2680526
|
Tyler > Geno
![]()
__________________
Adopt-A-Chief: John Dorsey
|
Posts: 18,410
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Badass!
Join Date: May 2010
Casino cash: $10016579
|
|
Posts: 6,502
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Franchise |
This message has been deleted by The Franchise.
|
![]() |
#5 |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
Casino cash: $2725047
|
Why exactly would drafting Jarvis Jones mean that we are transitioning to a 4-3? He's a 3-4 OLB.
|
Posts: 92,303
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
It really doesn't as the only possibility. I just didn't have room to mention others like a pass rushing rotation ala Giants (though in a 34), and grooming a young guy to take over for Tamba eventually.
|
Posts: 26,959
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Antonio Tx.
Casino cash: $3634454
|
It has????
__________________
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning: Matt once made a very nice play in Seattle where he spun away from a pass rusher and hit Bowe off his back foot for a first down. One of the best plays Matt has ever made. |
Posts: 66,914
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
|
Posts: 26,959
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
sorta mod-ish
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: KC North
Casino cash: $3101616
![]() |
There is no other pick. There is no need on this team greater than our need at quarterback. Don't buy the talk the windowlickers throw out about how no QB is worth the top pick this year. If a QB is good enough to be picked anywhere in the top 20, then for this team, he's good enough to be picked first overall.
|
Posts: 101,186
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 26,959
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Casino cash: $9716110
|
Quote:
It used to be in the last 20 years that only three positions justified a #1 pick: QB, LT, or pass rusher. The NFL has evolved and the positional value of a QB is now far greater than it was when "conventional wisdom" came up with the foregoing. QB is success-determinative. There is no other position on the field that will dictate success. You can win by using an average LT easier than winning with an average QB. It has to be a QB for a team whose most desperate need is QB. It is too bad that there is no consensus QB superstar in this draft, but the choices are good enough to justify taking the QB #1. |
|
Posts: 876
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
FYI,
I myself have picked Lotulelei in that scenario. Just think there's a better chance of keeping Albert than keeping T-Jax. |
Posts: 26,959
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
sorta mod-ish
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: KC North
Casino cash: $3101616
![]() |
Quote:
This is what is wrong with this fan base. Ignore the most important position on the field just to throw another ****ing defensive tackle from a high pick into the mix. This is how we've become programmed over the years. I sincerely hope you're trolling, Frankie. |
|
Posts: 101,186
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Tip of the hat LIV Champs
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: ks
Casino cash: $3155421
|
How come "smack babies" isn't one of poll choices?
|
Posts: 54,985
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 26,959
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|