|
|
01-22-2016, 05:34 AM | Topic Starter | |
__
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
Casino cash: $4173447
|
Seahawks WR Jermaine Kearse will hit the market.
I always liked this guy as a #2 WR.
Thoughts? http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14...attle-seahawks Quote:
|
|
Posts: 59,314
|
01-22-2016, 07:11 AM | #2 | |
left blank intentionally
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Belize Nuts
Casino cash: $4664897
|
Quote:
We need a real #2 for Maclin. Kearse would be perfect.
__________________
MY ADOPT-A-CHIEF : Jody Fortson Jr. |
|
Posts: 32,166
|
01-22-2016, 07:28 AM | #3 |
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Casino cash: $2000208
|
No more large contracts to WRs.
Maclin is great. I'm glad we signed him. But we can't afford another one. There's all of this quibbling about spending too much money on defense. "If we pay Howard, then we're spending too much on the DL, blah blah blah." Kearse is going to be searching for a larger payday than we're going to want to give him. He'll be looking for something that a 900-1000 yard receiver would be getting. With Maclin cracking 1000 yards as the #1, and considering that is the first time a single receiver has ever caught at least 1000 receiving yards from Alex Smith, it's just not worth it to pursue a WR2 in free agency unless you want another cheap-as-beans Donnie Avery that everybody will hate. Draft another WR. Do your ****ing homework, Dorsey, and draft us a good corps of WRs. ****, even the Jacksonville Jaguars are having success at it. It's not ****ing hard. Just ****ing do it. |
Posts: 90,713
|
01-22-2016, 07:30 AM | #4 | |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2010
Casino cash: $10014454
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 11,886
|
01-22-2016, 07:32 AM | #5 | |
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Casino cash: $2000208
|
Quote:
The San Antonio/Oakland/LA/Dubuque/Columbus/St. Louis Raiders will give him way more than that. And he'll probably say yes. Because cash. |
|
Posts: 90,713
|
01-22-2016, 07:32 AM | #6 |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2001
Casino cash: $7914831
|
I think Conley can be a good #2.
|
Posts: 11,477
|
01-22-2016, 07:42 AM | #7 | |
Still Got The Blues (For You)
Join Date: May 2013
Casino cash: $10014178
|
As do I.. but can the Chiefs really afford to rely on this?
The problem at WR is that aside from Maclin and apart from what Avant is, everyone else is young, unproven, or just mysterious as to whether they will step it up or simply are what they are... which is bleh as starters. So as is, plus adding a rd 1-3 rookie or 2nd/3rd tier vet in FA? That's all well and good... but if Maclin loses time again? KC could be just as screwed at WR. So are the Chiefs that different from other teams at WR? If every other team loses their #1 wideout... how does their WR corps look then?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 16,482
|
01-22-2016, 07:47 AM | #8 | |
left blank intentionally
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Belize Nuts
Casino cash: $4664897
|
Quote:
I love Conley and think that his potential is vast. I'd also like to see who Dorsey drafts. Kearse would definitely be an upgrade, but yeah, at what cost?
__________________
MY ADOPT-A-CHIEF : Jody Fortson Jr. |
|
Posts: 32,166
|
01-22-2016, 10:14 AM | #9 |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
Casino cash: $2649099
|
I still worry he's not the right kind of #2 for this offense.
He could be a dynamite #2 in Pittsburgh but he's just not precise enough or quick enough with his feet to be a true #2 here. Additionally, we want our #2 to be able to step in as a #1 and I don't think his game is rounded enough for that. Sadly, Emmanuel Sanders would've been perfect for that job. Of the likely FAs, Travis Benjamin is the guy I see that would be best suited for the job. He's not that big WR that teams are likely to pay as a #1 so he may be a little more affordable. He's quick enough and a solid route-runner with elite YAC skills so he should be great in the scheme. He proved this year that he can hold his own as a #1 if absolutely necessary (though it's not an ideal role for him). Benjamin is tops among my FA WR candidates by a fair margin. Unfortunately it appears that it's very likely he'll be staying in Cleveland. It's unfortunate as he really is an ideal option; almost Maclin-like in terms of how well he would fit given our needs. Marvin Jones is probably #2. I'd probably say Rishard Matthews is my #3 and then maybe Hankerson and Sanu. When that's the list, you're probably well served to look to the draft and hope that the guys you already have take a step forward.
__________________
"If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..." "When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags." |
Posts: 60,810
|
01-22-2016, 10:36 AM | #10 | |
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Casino cash: $2000208
|
Quote:
It's astounding to me that the ONLY draft investment we've made at the WR position in three years has been Chris Conley. That's a shortcoming of Dorsey's. He's identified WR talent in the past. He's found it in all places from the 1st to the 7th. So given we've had WR problems for 3 years, why does he keep insisting on turning to free agency to solve his problems at the position? Just ****ing draft guys. |
|
Posts: 90,713
|
01-22-2016, 11:13 AM | #11 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $2444064
|
Quote:
However, I think it's time to throw a few more draft picks in there from a financial standpoint. |
|
Posts: 81,474
|
01-22-2016, 11:20 AM | #12 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
Casino cash: $2649099
|
Quote:
Spencer Ware may actually be a better pure RB for the kind of change of pace this offense needs. His ability to just beat the shit out of people and force teams to keep more bulk on the field to answer for him allows us to make more space. With Charles back there, you just put speed everywhere and it'll work itself out. You try to do that with Ware and he'll just run you the !@#$ over. So you put in a LBer or bigger box safety and now we're able to find a little more room in the passing game as well. If you used Charles on jet-sweep actions and had him running all those plays that Wilson was running....holy ****, how do you deal with that? If he gets the ball, he's in space. If you throw him the ball, he's in space. Lord, think of the WR screens! If you hand it to Ware, Charles is such a threat that he's almost certainly pulled someone out of the middle on the sweep action. It would work, man. It'll never happen and truthfully maybe it shouldn't, but someone tell me why Charles couldn't be the X receiver in this offense, especially if we increase the amount of jet-sweep actions we run. When Ware needs a break, you just move Charles to the backfield and put Wilson back out there. It would extend Jamaal's career by taken a bunch of hits off his body and I think we'd be a better team for it.
__________________
"If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..." "When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags." |
|
Posts: 60,810
|
01-22-2016, 11:21 AM | #13 | |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
Casino cash: $2745047
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 92,303
|
01-22-2016, 11:22 AM | #14 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $2444064
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 81,474
|
01-22-2016, 07:58 AM | #15 | |
Still Got The Blues (For You)
Join Date: May 2013
Casino cash: $10014178
|
^ guess the next question is, how many teams are paying out large $ to more than one WR?
We know Denver throws out big money to their guys Thomas and Sanders. Same for Atlanta with Julio and Roddy. Redskins with Garcon and Desean J. GB with Nelson and Cobb.. For what the Chiefs do.. I don't see them springing for another WR making 6+ mil per yr. They are likely gearing up for the Kelce contract soon enough. So, any good #2 types available for 3-5 mil per? Maybe even a vet that has only a few good years left?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 16,482
|
|
|