|
|
View Poll Results: Compare and contrast the QB history of these teams. | |||
*** Part 1 - Which team has a better 50-year history at the QB position? | 0 | 0% | |
Tennessee | 12 | 66.67% | |
Washington | 6 | 33.33% | |
*** Part 2 - How would you rate the Titans' quarterback history? | 0 | 0% | |
Very strong | 0 | 0% | |
Somewhat strong | 4 | 22.22% | |
About average | 10 | 55.56% | |
Somewhat weak | 3 | 16.67% | |
Very weak | 1 | 5.56% | |
*** Part 3 - How would you rate the Redskins' quarterback history? | 0 | 0% | |
Very strong | 0 | 0% | |
Somewhat strong | 3 | 16.67% | |
About average | 9 | 50.00% | |
Somewhat weak | 5 | 27.78% | |
Very weak | 1 | 5.56% | |
I'll vote however you want. Just don't show that broken leg clip. | 1 | 5.56% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-18-2016, 07:08 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Casino cash: $9998560
|
Come on Football season! Get here soon.
|
Posts: 53,803
|
06-18-2016, 07:14 PM | #3 |
NFL's #1 Ermines Fan
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
Casino cash: $2878491
VARSITY
|
My thoughts:
Tennessee. They had pretty good quarterbacks for 27 years in Moon, Pastorini, and the really tough Steve McNair. Other than that, it's a complete disaster. But that's probably above average around the league, so I rated them "somewhat strong". It's pretty much a nod to Moon. Washington. Man, 12 pro bowls with that list? Have they ever been above average at QB? Maybe Jurgensen was above average, I guess, but he was before my time. I think a random general manager off the street (but not Scott Pioli) could have had a better quarterback history than that. I think their pro bowls were generally because they had strong teams around the quarterback. I rated them "somewhat weak" as an homage to the pro bowls, but it's not an impressive timeline.
__________________
I'm putting random letters here as a celebration of free speech: xigrakgrah misorojeq rkemeseit. |
Posts: 141,812
|
|
|