Chiefs Would you rather be 8-0 with Alex Smith or 3-5 with Geno?

-King- · 10-28-2013, 01:27 PM

Our offense is terrible with Alex Smith. It would likely be worse with Geno given his propensity to turn the ball over and give the other teams points through pick 6s and returned fumbles for TDs. So seeing as how we barely win with the offense we have now, we'd have likely lost more than a few games if we had Geno as our QB.

But would you rather take those growing pains with Geno, or be 8-0 with Alex and be in the driver seat toward a first round bye in the playoffs?

Wallcrawler · 10-28-2013, 01:29 PM

Give me the wins. These past few seasons have been ROUGH.

NinerDoug · 10-28-2013, 01:30 PM

Win ugly always beats lose pretty, IMO.

Halfcan · 10-28-2013, 01:31 PM

Who in the hell would want to be 3-5?

Wallcrawler · 10-28-2013, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan

Who in the hell would want to be 3-5?

3-5 now, but with a hopeful franchise QB going to the learning tree this year I think is what he's getting at.

So instant gratification with a shot at playoffs/superbowl, or a long term investment where we could be good for a long time.

Geno's got some athleticism to be sure, but that dude has made some epically stupid plays this year. Im not entirely sold on him as the next big thing.

warrior · 10-28-2013, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan

Who in the hell would want to be 3-5?

choco peni suckers

**Bearcat** · 10-28-2013, 01:34 PM

Geno or otherwise, and if it was this year, next year, etc; I'll take the bigger risk now and some losses for the bigger reward later than a bunch of hollow "at least we aren't 2-14" wins.

I'd love to be able to say that statements like "I don't know if KC could handle a losing season or two with a rookie QB without demanding another retread" or "I don't think a lot of Chiefs fan understand what it takes to be competitive in this league" or "I don't think most people understand the high risk/high reward strategy is the way to go over low risk/win now strategy" are absurd, but I have my doubts.

Discuss Thrower · 10-28-2013, 01:41 PM

Of course I'd be the only one to vote Geno so far. Whatever.

It comes down to this: does Alex have the capability to win a SB without an astronomically good defense and all the lucky breaks in the world? Probably not.

Does Geno? Maybe.

Who will be in the league as a starter seven years from now? Probably Geno.

Halfcan · 10-28-2013, 01:42 PM

Geno sucks- when will the Planet stop loving him-lol

So the NFl counts "hollow wins now as not wins?"

The Donks sucked the whole game until the Skins laid down for them- is that a "hollow win'? But Manning is not a retread coming off neck surgery with two bad ankles lol

Halfcan · 10-28-2013, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower

Of course I'd be the only one to vote Geno so far. Whatever.

It comes down to this: does Alex have the capability to win a SB without an astronomically good defense and all the lucky breaks in the world? Probably not.

Does Geno? Maybe.

Who will be in the league as a starter seven years from now? Probably Geno.

Will Geno be a Jet? Doubtful with all those Ints.

Skyy God · 10-28-2013, 01:46 PM

We had a win now roster and could ill afford Geno's growing pains.

This is not a close case by any stretch.

Marcellus · 10-28-2013, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower

Of course I'd be the only one to vote Geno so far. Whatever.

It comes down to this: does Alex have the capability to win a SB without an astronomically good defense and all the lucky breaks in the world? Probably not.

Does Geno? Maybe.

Who will be in the league as a starter seven years from now? Probably Geno.

Ringing endorsement.

**The Franchise** · 10-28-2013, 01:50 PM

It's hard to say that Geno would be 3-5 with this team. Not the same offensive scheme. Not the same offensive skill players.

l4z4rd · 10-28-2013, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

It's hard to say that Geno would be 3-5 with this team. Not the same offensive scheme. Not the same offensive skill players.

same turnovers

**The Franchise** · 10-28-2013, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by l4z4rd

same turnovers

Or not.

Geno would have a completely different HC and QB coach.

View Poll Results: Geno vs. Alex this time with more polls!
3-5 with Geno	18	8.41%
8-0 with Alex	196	91.59%
Voters: 214. You may not vote on this poll

10-28-2013, 01:27 PM
-King- ▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $625743	Would you rather be 8-0 with Alex Smith or 3-5 with Geno? Our offense is terrible with Alex Smith. It would likely be worse with Geno given his propensity to turn the ball over and give the other teams points through pick 6s and returned fumbles for TDs. So seeing as how we barely win with the offense we have now, we'd have likely lost more than a few games if we had Geno as our QB. But would you rather take those growing pains with Geno, or be 8-0 with Alex and be in the driver seat toward a first round bye in the playoffs?
Posts: 64,442

10-28-2013, 01:29 PM	#2
Wallcrawler How tall is this thing? Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Ground 0 for enema of US. Casino cash: $3792912	Give me the wins. These past few seasons have been ROUGH. __________________ If shit could shit, it still wouldn't be as shitty as this sig.
Posts: 7,083

10-28-2013, 01:31 PM	#4
Halfcan In Search of a Life Join Date: Aug 2005 Casino cash: $7327995	Who in the hell would want to be 3-5?
Posts: 43,200

10-28-2013, 01:34 PM	#7
Bearcat Would an idiot do that? Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Arizona Casino cash: $974931	Geno or otherwise, and if it was this year, next year, etc; I'll take the bigger risk now and some losses for the bigger reward later than a bunch of hollow "at least we aren't 2-14" wins. I'd love to be able to say that statements like "I don't know if KC could handle a losing season or two with a rookie QB without demanding another retread" or "I don't think a lot of Chiefs fan understand what it takes to be competitive in this league" or "I don't think most people understand the high risk/high reward strategy is the way to go over low risk/win now strategy" are absurd, but I have my doubts. __________________
Posts: 57,091

10-28-2013, 01:41 PM	#8
Discuss Thrower "You like to drink?" Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: "I like to drink." Casino cash: $1396869	Of course I'd be the only one to vote Geno so far. Whatever. It comes down to this: does Alex have the capability to win a SB without an astronomically good defense and all the lucky breaks in the world? Probably not. Does Geno? Maybe. Who will be in the league as a starter seven years from now? Probably Geno. __________________ Chiefs 2016 Opponents: Home: JAX, TEN, NO, TB, NYJ. Away: HOU, IND, ATL, CAR, PIT Chiefs 2017 Opponents: Home: BUF, MIA, PHI, WSH, AFC North. Away: NE, NYJ, NYG, DAL, AFC South
Posts: 44,190

10-28-2013, 01:42 PM	#9
Halfcan In Search of a Life Join Date: Aug 2005 Casino cash: $7327995	Geno sucks- when will the Planet stop loving him-lol So the NFl counts "hollow wins now as not wins?" The Donks sucked the whole game until the Skins laid down for them- is that a "hollow win'? But Manning is not a retread coming off neck surgery with two bad ankles lol
Posts: 43,200

10-28-2013, 01:46 PM	#11
Skyy God 11-5, baby Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Livin the dream Casino cash: $2191557	We had a win now roster and could ill afford Geno's growing pains. This is not a close case by any stretch.
Posts: 22,416

10-28-2013, 01:50 PM	#13
The Franchise Most Valuable Villain Join Date: Dec 2006 Casino cash: $2555047	It's hard to say that Geno would be 3-5 with this team. Not the same offensive scheme. Not the same offensive skill players.
Posts: 92,316