You shut your whore mouth!

Speaking of Pioli, he hasn't been seen in weeks. Thankfully.

Yea thats bugged me a little for 3 years now. Wouldve been awesome.

I think he was spotted on the field before the game last week.

So will Denver sit Manning?

If the Colts beat the Texans they will play to win for sure.

I saw him on the TV mixing it up with the players before the game. Coulda been old footage or something though.

We have the #1 pick.

This game doesn't even need to be played next week.

The line should be Broncos -20.5

The Broncos aren't sitting Manning.

The Patriots aren't going to lose to the Dolphins.

I'd rather win and take away homefield advantage from the Broncos.

All the Games that mean something will be FLEXED to 4pm kickoff

NE holds the tiebreaker over Denver.

So if NE beats Miami at 1 (likely) then they will play for the bye.

If New England wins, Denver will need the win to seal the bye week because New England has the head-to-head.

That's stupid. Sorry.

They aren't flexing 5 games to 4.

The Dolphins/Pats, Vikings/Green Bay, Redskins/Cowboys, Ravens/Bengals, and Texans/Colts all have some meaning.

there are more important things to worry about at this point.

That game will be flexed to 4pm

Wanna bet?

lets hope so.

Sure is.

It's more of the immediate future as opposed to the long term success.

No Chief fan should be rooting for Kansas City next week.

Control your own destiny with the pick and get the ****ing guy you want.

Denver is NOT going to sit Manning regardless of what happens with New England.

The stats don't lie, momentum is important going into the playoffs. Teams that rest starters end up losing.

Manning can attest to that with the colts too.

Show me a link where it says it's going to flex any game that has meaning to 4.

Because there's actually 2 more games that have meaning Eagles/Giants, and Bears/Lions.

What would be the point of flexing 7 games into a 4 o'clock slot? The ratings surely won't improve that much from a 1-4.

It happens every year. It will come out tonight don't need to link it.

Who cares. Just flex NE to 4pm to eliminate any possibility of Denver sitting starters.

How is it stupid? Not wanting the Broncos to have an easy road to the superbowl is not stupid. If it means picking 34th instead of 33rd in the second round... so be it.

If picking 1 spot back for 3 rounds means that the Broncos have to go through either New England or Houston to get to the Superbowl, then I'm down for it.

:bravo:

Picking #1 overall is what we want.

Yeah that's stupid.

And thats what we'll get. Wanting to beat the donks is only if the Jags win first

Exactly. If Jacksonville bests Tennessee (actually possible) and we lose to Denver, we get the first pick each of the three days of the draft. That's a big advantage to be able to rearrange your board and get the guy you want and not have to go to plan b...especially in a draft that is very deep in a few positions of need for us (qb, DL, etc)

Having that first pick in the second, third and fourth rounds is gonna give us a sizable advantage.

I couldn't care any less where Denver plays their playoff games.

Who gives a shit about Denver this year? Who gives a shit about the entire NFL this year?

The 2012 season is all about the future for KC, nothing to gain in the present.

The only downside to us winning next week is we have to alternate the first pick in the 2nd, 4th, and 6th round with the Jags. Having to move back 1 spot for 3 picks is a small price to pay if it means that the Broncos won't get to stay at home throughout the playoffs.

The Jags would get the First pick in every round.

We're picking #1 overall regardless in this scenario. The only thing that changes if we win is that we'll switch picks with the Jags for the 2nd, 4th, and 6th round.

:facepalm: Can you read the 1st post I quoted? This is all assuming the Jags win next week.

Yeah it's still stupid.

You're being nice.

It's mind-numbingly ****ing stupid.

I could give two shits about what happens to Denver this year.

I do care about the next 10 years in KC, however.

Denver can win the SB for all I care. I want the highest possible pick in every round.

:facepalm:

The Jags just took the Patriots to the wire.

Tennessee just gave up a 50-burger and stopped trying 2 weeks ago.

It's a very winnable game for JAX.

This.

If I could chose between us having the top pick in every round and Denver making it to the superbowl----or alternating picks with Jacksonville In rounds 2,4 and 6 and Denver losing in the first round, I'd be perfectly fine with the first option.

This season is all about the Chiefs future and I want every advantage we can get.

I don't care if the Donkeys shut everybody out en route to their third Super Bowl trophy. It doesn't do anything for or against us. All I care about is what's going on with my Chiefs. How are we gonna get better is what's on my mind.

Depends what Jacksonville team shows up. Henne has been faulty this year.

Jim Wyatt ‏@jwyattsports

#Titans owner Bud Adams: “I like Mike (Munchak). But liking him and getting the job done are two different things." http://tnne.ws/RdDnFY



Jags might just win.

We need New England to beat Miami in the early game.

Then Denver has to beat us to get a first round bye. They'll play hard for that, IMO.

So ideally, Jacksonville beats Tennessee, New England beats Miami, and then Denver hangs us on a rusty nail in the afternoon...

Can you imagine if a huge stud, say Hunter or some other talent, drops to 33 and the ****ing JAGS picked him up?! ****! NO THANKS!

Albert Breer ‏@AlbertBreer

That's the league's plan, yes. RT @ChiefsOrioles10 @AlbertBreer Tonight we find out what games get flex to 4pm right?

These guys who NEED to upset Denver probably have Bronco fan friends, family, or coworkers...

Denver is not going to let up. It doesn't matter what New England does. Teams that rest starters lose in the playoffs. Super Bowls are about momentum, Denver going to pound us.

I could go for one of those

<img src="http://cdn.liquor.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/drambuie-rusty-nail2.jpg" id="il_fi" height="293" width="293" style="padding-right: 8px; padding-top: 8px; padding-bottom: 8px;">

This may have already been said, but Denver can finish anywhere between the 1 seed and the 3 seed, so the game definitely is going to mean something to them regardless. Manning will play.

I really, really, really, really, really hope that Jacksonville wins so we can unleash our full rooting fury on the cheating Broncos.

We had this conversation last week. You could only link two games.

I'm not buying it happens "every year"
Posted via Mobile Device

I think the Texans and Pats play at 12:00.

If somehow they both loose, won't the Donks automatically lock up 1st seed?

Therefore the 3:00 game with the Chiefs wont matter.

Also not sure of the tiebreaker with Donks and Pats

The only way Denver has nothing to play for is a Pats loss and Houston win.

That is a possible scenario, and the main thing that ruins it all is those games are at noon before the Chiefs play.

Again, the league has become about getting hot at the right time.

The Broncos won't be resting anybody, even if they already have the #1 seed.

Denver could rest every starter on their team and still beat the Chiefs by 35 points.

That is the beauty of Romeo/Daboll/Quinn.

Broncos fan cracking me up.