Chiefs Gronk or Kelce - Page 3

Chiefer8989 · 10-18-2019, 03:41 PM

Two great TE's. When both were at their best, who was better? Again, this isn't about who you would rather have long term. Or necessarily about better career. Someone can have a better career yet not necessarily be better (For example Brady has had a better career than Montana. But Joe was better).

InChiefsHeaven · 10-18-2019, 06:31 PM

Gronk did Tide Pod ads...and probably ate them too.

Kelce does videos of eating really hot salsa and stuff.

Kelce wins.

But seriously, Gronk was ****ing insanely good when healthy, just automatic. Kelce has had his ups and downs, but has been pretty much automatic. Not as good a blocker, but not some pussy who won't block by a long shot. When he finally hangs up the cleats, ask me then. Both are HOFers, and Gronk has a longer resume. We'll see. Right now, it's a slight edge to Gronk.

MrCasual · 10-18-2019, 06:45 PM

There is no comparison, Gronk is one of if not the best blocking TE in the history of the NFL. He is also one of the best receiving TE's in the history of the NFL. Kelce doesn't even crack the top 5 in NFL history. Try to stay objective, Kelce is not in Gronks class, sorry. Dude got embarrassed in last year's AFC championship game and you want to put him on Gronks level in his prime....lol

**Buehler445** · 10-18-2019, 06:49 PM

What officiating am I getting? Chiefs or Cheatriot. There is a material difference.

aloyouis · 10-18-2019, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrCasual

There is no comparison, Gronk is one of if not the best blocking TE in the history of the NFL. He is also one of the best receiving TE's in the history of the NFL. Kelce doesn't even crack the top 5 in NFL history. Try to stay objective, Kelce is not in Gronks class, sorry. Dude got embarrassed in last year's AFC championship game and you want to put him on Gronks level in his prime....lol

100%

Monty · 10-18-2019, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR

Tony is the greatest TE of all time.

He was also perhaps the biggest ****ing asshole towards fans that I've ever seen from a Chiefs player. He wasn't just unwilling to be around them... he was actually a straight up MEAN son of a bitch towards them.

Since he has recently in so many words chosen to be recognized as an Atlanta Falcon in spite of being a Chief for over a decade, I don't really give a shit about him anymore.

Kelce is cooler, better at YAC, and he's more entertaining to watch. He loves this team and the city, and it would take something sudden and monumental for him to one day turn his back on KC like Tony did.

Oh, and **** Gronk. Nobody cares.

Exact same opinion as me, so thanks for posting this!

SupDock · 10-18-2019, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aloyouis

100%

Cool. Random Patriots fans sign up to say Kelce is not in the same league as Gronk. Totally unbiased. Very believable

203Pat · 10-18-2019, 10:29 PM

Kelce is just a slow receiver and a moody bitch. Gronk is the greatest TE who ever lived.

TomB · 10-18-2019, 10:59 PM

"When both were at their best, who was better?"

Answering the question as it's posed: Gronk, period.

Master Chief · 10-18-2019, 11:44 PM

Tony Gonzalez.

MAHOMO 4 LIFE! · 10-19-2019, 01:15 AM

Kelce is just consistent asf. He is #4 in receiving yards for players this year.... he’s a TE

oldman · 10-19-2019, 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefshrink

It's a wash at this point.

Gronk a better blocker.
Gronk had better consistent hands.
Kelce more athletic
Kelce better speed
Kelce runs better routes

Both are gamers in the red zone with Gronk having the slight edge only because TB was throwing to him and Kelce had Smith BUT things have changed in KC

Maybe when it is all said and done for Kelce, PM2 will have vaulted Kelce above Gronk and make it into the HOF with better stats.

I agree with most of this. The only thing I disagree on is that Kelce will move ahead of Gronk. The reason is he won't have PMII his entire career. If I have to choose, it's Kelce, hands down.
As to the question is Kelce better than Gonzalez? Take a look at who was throwing to TG in his 1st 4 years and his last 2 in KC. Even if his was a dick to KC fans, you have to admit his stats are pretty impressive. But I still go with Kelce.

**Tribal Warfare** · 10-19-2019, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 203Pat

Kelce is just a slow receiver and a moody bitch. Gronk is the greatest TE who ever lived.

GOAT TE is Gonzalez

CrookedTrump · 10-19-2019, 05:27 PM

No offense but only on a Chiefs message board would this be asked. Who is better at thier best? Gronk when healthy was arguably the biggest mismatch in NFL history. His clutch big performances (including playoffs and SBs) are legendary. His blocking was as good if not better as most offensive lineman. His catch radius was as big as it gets - and once he caught it good luck tackling him.

His only downfall was the injuries, Kelce has him on that.

Imon Yourside · 10-19-2019, 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomB

"When both were at their best, who was better?"

Answering the question as it's posed: Gronk, period.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 203Pat

Kelce is just a slow receiver and a moody bitch. Gronk is the greatest TE who ever lived.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrCasual

There is no comparison, Gronk is one of if not the best blocking TE in the history of the NFL. He is also one of the best receiving TE's in the history of the NFL. Kelce doesn't even crack the top 5 in NFL history. Try to stay objective, Kelce is not in Gronks class, sorry. Dude got embarrassed in last year's AFC championship game and you want to put him on Gronks level in his prime....lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

Gronk, and I hate saying that but he had more reliable hands, didn't have that mental lapse and drop a routine catch like Travis does.

Rob was a better blocker too

Quote:

Originally Posted by tyecopeland

Gronk was a better blocker

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrookedTrump

No offense but only on a Chiefs message board would this be asked. Who is better at thier best? Gronk when healthy was arguably the biggest mismatch in NFL history. His clutch big performances (including playoffs and SBs) are legendary. His blocking was as good if not better as most offensive lineman. His catch radius was as big as it gets - and once he caught it good luck tackling him.

His only downfall was the injuries, Kelce has him on that.

Chargem · 10-20-2019, 02:47 AM

I thought this was going to be a difficult question, like "who would you rather hold your beer while you bang a pornstar, Gronk or Kelce?"

Now that is tricky. I feel like Gronk would want a lot of high fives, but Kelce would talk a lot more about what you were doing and stuff?

I think I'd have to go Kelce, because at the end of the day I don't think I could trust Gronk to remember the beer wasn't his and sip it.

10-18-2019, 03:41 PM
Chiefer8989 Bleeding Chiefs Red Join Date: Oct 2018 Location: Toronto.Born in Jasper,MO Casino cash: $10000400	Gronk or Kelce Two great TE's. When both were at their best, who was better? Again, this isn't about who you would rather have long term. Or necessarily about better career. Someone can have a better career yet not necessarily be better (For example Brady has had a better career than Montana. But Joe was better).
Posts: 92

10-18-2019, 06:31 PM	#31
InChiefsHeaven Rockin' yer FACE OFF! Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Omaha, Nebraska Casino cash: $3974937	Gronk did Tide Pod ads...and probably ate them too. Kelce does videos of eating really hot salsa and stuff. Kelce wins. But seriously, Gronk was ****ing insanely good when healthy, just automatic. Kelce has had his ups and downs, but has been pretty much automatic. Not as good a blocker, but not some pussy who won't block by a long shot. When he finally hangs up the cleats, ask me then. Both are HOFers, and Gronk has a longer resume. We'll see. Right now, it's a slight edge to Gronk. __________________ We have a million reasons for failure, but not one excuse... Die Donks, DIE!! Holy Crap fellas!!! We did it!!! THREE TIMES!!!
Posts: 25,700

10-18-2019, 06:45 PM	#32
MrCasual Starter Join Date: Oct 2019 Casino cash: $10000400	There is no comparison, Gronk is one of if not the best blocking TE in the history of the NFL. He is also one of the best receiving TE's in the history of the NFL. Kelce doesn't even crack the top 5 in NFL history. Try to stay objective, Kelce is not in Gronks class, sorry. Dude got embarrassed in last year's AFC championship game and you want to put him on Gronks level in his prime....lol
Posts: 100

10-18-2019, 06:49 PM	#33
Buehler445 Supporter Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Scott City KS Casino cash: $2434734	What officiating am I getting? Chiefs or Cheatriot. There is a material difference.
Posts: 56,727

10-18-2019, 10:29 PM	#37
203Pat Starter Join Date: Jan 2019 Casino cash: $9980400	Kelce is just a slow receiver and a moody bitch. Gronk is the greatest TE who ever lived.
Posts: 68	0 2

10-18-2019, 10:59 PM	#38
TomB Starter Join Date: Sep 2019 Location: Boston Casino cash: $9970400	"When both were at their best, who was better?" Answering the question as it's posed: Gronk, period.
Posts: 288	0 2

10-18-2019, 11:44 PM	#39
Master Chief Starter Join Date: Oct 2019 Casino cash: $10000400	Tony Gonzalez.
Posts: 72

10-19-2019, 01:15 AM	#40
MAHOMO 4 LIFE! In Search of a Life Join Date: Nov 2018 Casino cash: $6880400	Kelce is just consistent asf. He is #4 in receiving yards for players this year.... he’s a TE
Posts: 21,162

10-19-2019, 05:27 PM	#43
CrookedTrump Banned Join Date: Jan 2019 Casino cash: $10000400	No offense but only on a Chiefs message board would this be asked. Who is better at thier best? Gronk when healthy was arguably the biggest mismatch in NFL history. His clutch big performances (including playoffs and SBs) are legendary. His blocking was as good if not better as most offensive lineman. His catch radius was as big as it gets - and once he caught it good luck tackling him. His only downfall was the injuries, Kelce has him on that.
Posts: 106

10-20-2019, 02:47 AM	#45
Chargem Veteran Join Date: Feb 2018 Casino cash: $4020400	I thought this was going to be a difficult question, like "who would you rather hold your beer while you bang a pornstar, Gronk or Kelce?" Now that is tricky. I feel like Gronk would want a lot of high fives, but Kelce would talk a lot more about what you were doing and stuff? I think I'd have to go Kelce, because at the end of the day I don't think I could trust Gronk to remember the beer wasn't his and sip it.
Posts: 2,268

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode