Forget Peterson and Ramsey

[ShowtimeSBMVP]

@Chiefs source says the team isn’t interested in @Jaguars CB @jalenramsey now that he wants a trade. Source says the team’s locker room “is too good right now.” The team did ask @AZCardinals about CB Patrick Peterson earlier this year and was “emphatically told no.”

— Jeffri Chadiha (@jeffrichadiha) September 17, 2019

Regarding Jalen Ramsey: I think the Chiefs will continue to monitor the CB monitor. However, I would not expect a hard push for Ramsey.

Ramsey will require a lot of capital via picks and a new deal, and the Chiefs have have Mahomes and Chris Jones' deals to work through. https://t.co/R5hUZO69fi

— Terez A. Paylor (@TerezPaylor) September 17, 2019

[Mecca]

Meanwhile Howard in Miami responded to the Fitzpatrick trade like this...

pic.twitter.com/wLbhtqqNv5

— Xavien Howard (@Iamxavienhoward) September 17, 2019

[Sassy Squatch]

Originally Posted by Showtime

No lol that twitter person made that shit up stop listening to people on twitter without the blue check mark

I've seen plenty of legit insider info from people without a "blue check mark". That might be one of the dumbest things I've ever read.

[ShowtimeSBMVP]

Originally Posted by Superturtle

I've seen plenty of legit insider info from people without a "blue check mark". That might be one of the dumbest things I've ever read.

Yeah cause that person had 100 followers yup they have real info lol

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by Showtime

Yeah cause that person had 100 followers yup they have real info lol

Quit acting like you’re some twitter guru just because you know how to copy and paste.

[ShowtimeSBMVP]

Originally Posted by The Franchise

Quit acting like you’re some twitter guru just because you know how to copy and paste.

Not acting lol someone that has a 100 followers is most likely lying

[Dunerdr]

I’m not really buying any of the rumors right now one minute we’re in then we’re out. We have an obvious need an obvious “soft window” with Mahomes on a rookie deal.

[O.city]

As much as I like Ramsey, it just doesn't make sense.

You're talking 2 first rounders and a massive deal. Probably wise to let someone else do that if you're plan is to keep Chris Jones.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by O.city

As much as I like Ramsey, it just doesn't make sense.

You're talking 2 first rounders and a massive deal. Probably wise to let someone else do that if you're plan is to keep Chris Jones.

I could make the argument finding a top of the line CB is much harder than finding DL in todays game.

[FAH-Q]

Originally Posted by O.city

As much as I like Ramsey, it just doesn't make sense.

You're talking 2 first rounders and a massive deal. Probably wise to let someone else do that if you're plan is to keep Chris Jones.

I get the Ramsey deal may not make sense financially, but is there any verification they fully intend on keeping Jones and signing him to a massive deal? If he somehow matches last year's production, that's a huge contract we'd end up giving for another defensive linemen when our overall depth at CB, especially after this year, is almost nonexistent. I almost feel like they intend on franchising Jones and using him as trade bait, sort of like Seattle did with Clark.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by Mecca

I could make the argument finding a top of the line CB is much harder than finding DL in todays game.

Then I'd counter that top of the line Cb isn't as necessary because of the rules of the league and you can't really be that aggressive back there anymore.

So having a DL that can be dominant against the pass always takes precedence

[St. Patty's Fire]

Originally Posted by Mecca

I could make the argument finding a top of the line CB is much harder than finding DL in todays game.

I would also argue that a good Cb is just flat out more valuable than a good Dl

[O.city]

Originally Posted by FAH-Q

I get the Ramsey deal may not make sense financially, but is there any verification they fully intend on keeping Jones and signing him to a massive deal? If he somehow matches last year's production, that's a huge contract we'd end up giving for another defensive linemen when our overall depth at CB, especially after this year, is almost nonexistent. I almost feel like they intend on franchising Jones and using him as trade bait, sort of like Seattle did with Clark.

If that's what they wanna do, sure.

But Terez seems to insinuate they wanna pay Jones.

[Jerm]

Originally Posted by O.city

Then I'd counter that top of the line Cb isn't as necessary because of the rules of the league and you can't really be that aggressive back there anymore.

So having a DL that can be dominant against the pass always takes precedence

Not when your main competition to get to a Super Bowl completely and utterly neutralizes your pass rush.

You need a lock down CB to beat New England...period.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by O.city

Then I'd counter that top of the line Cb isn't as necessary because of the rules of the league and you can't really be that aggressive back there anymore.

So having a DL that can be dominant against the pass always takes precedence

How dominant can you be when everyone's scheme is to throw the ball in 2 seconds?

Look at how NE is built, there is some argument that building back to front is smarter for today's rules and schemes.

[St. Patty's Fire]

Originally Posted by Mecca

How dominant can you be when everyone's scheme is to throw the ball in 2 seconds?

Look at how NE is built, there is some argument that building back to front is smarter for today's rules and schemes.

Ya NE has like 0 names at all on their DL and are absolutely dominant