I Thought You Guys Said the AFC East Was the Worst Division EVER!!

[Amnorix]

So it looks like the AFC East – which everyone one here was trying to convince me was the worst division that ever even thought about putting on cleats -- is not in fact so incredibly god-awful compared to some divisions ....like the AFC West for example. Let's look at the actual results from the non-Pats/Chiefs teams in the AFC East/West.

The only AFCW/AFCE game remaining this year is Pats/Chiefs. In the other three games, the AFC East won the head to head matchups 2-1. All three games were blowouts. The Chargers wiped out the Dolphins, while the Jets spanked the Raiders and the Bills strangled the Broncos. Combined score doesn’t look good for the West. The East scored a combined total of 64 points to the West’s 36.

In fact, it seems reasonably clear that the third best team in the combined AFCE/W (if you assume Pats/Chiefs are 1st and 2nd in what order you like), is the Bills.

[RickObie]

People are "Tripping" over themselves to post in this thread!!!!

[Kman34]

Yeah we said it.. so what?? It’s true..

[Sassy Squatch]

Originally Posted by Amnorix

This whole thread has gone weird.

First, I'm not insecure. I'm pointing out that a point of view that many took here a month or two ago appears incorrect. Not sure why that's insecure.

Second, whenever the Patriots come up around here it's "Cheatriots", "refs" and "weak-ass AFC East". It's nonsense, and I'm pointing out that it's nonsense.

Dont' paint me with the same brush as the Pats fans who have joined in the last year or whatever. I'd like to think that nearly two decades on here bought me a little more credibility than that, but I guess not.

Thought this was a football site. People said football stuff a while back. I argued then and nobody wanted to listen. Now that there is more proof that they were wrong, I'm bringing it up again. Why that's "insecure" or "being a dick" I'm not sure. Maybe some just don't like being proven wrong.

[Rasputin]

Originally Posted by Amnorix

This whole thread has gone weird.

First, I'm not insecure. I'm pointing out that a point of view that many took here a month or two ago appears incorrect. Not sure why that's insecure.

Second, whenever the Patriots come up around here it's "Cheatriots", "refs" and "weak-ass AFC East". It's nonsense, and I'm pointing out that it's nonsense.

Dont' paint me with the same brush as the Pats fans who have joined in the last year or whatever. I'd like to think that nearly two decades on here bought me a little more credibility than that, but I guess not.

Thought this was a football site. People said football stuff a while back. I argued then and nobody wanted to listen. Now that there is more proof that they were wrong, I'm bringing it up again. Why that's "insecure" or "being a dick" I'm not sure. Maybe some just don't like being proven wrong.

What's weird is that you come to a "Chiefs fan" forum expecting us to conform to your thoughts and idealizations. We don't support boy kissing quarterbacks and Patriots are a proven cheating Franchise so you will never get that off your monarchy you're like Baghdag Bob narratives. You know you will just piss us off talking about the Patriots and we don't even play you this week. Save your bullshit for our game week but let us have Raider week for ****s sake.



Ammorex blah blah blah blah we're not cheaters

[carcosa]

Originally Posted by Amnorix

This whole thread has gone weird.

First, I'm not insecure. I'm pointing out that a point of view that many took here a month or two ago appears incorrect. Not sure why that's insecure.

Second, whenever the Patriots come up around here it's "Cheatriots", "refs" and "weak-ass AFC East". It's nonsense, and I'm pointing out that it's nonsense.

Dont' paint me with the same brush as the Pats fans who have joined in the last year or whatever. I'd like to think that nearly two decades on here bought me a little more credibility than that, but I guess not.

Thought this was a football site. People said football stuff a while back. I argued then and nobody wanted to listen. Now that there is more proof that they were wrong, I'm bringing it up again. Why that's "insecure" or "being a dick" I'm not sure. Maybe some just don't like being proven wrong.

Pretty long post...... you seem insecure

[Rasputin]

Originally Posted by carcosa

Pretty long post...... you seem insecure

Anyone who has to say "I'm not insecure" is insecure for sure.

[RollChiefsRoll]

The Patriots cheat. Tom Brady is a system QB. Bill Belichick’s legacy is tainted. Bob Kraft gets handies from sex slaves. Mark Wahlberg is a douchebag. Dunkin Donuts sucks.

[RealSNR]

That really rustled your jimmies

[Gravedigger]

Originally Posted by RollChiefsRoll

Dunkin Donuts sucks.

#TRIGGERED

[CasselGotPeedOn]

You would think Asterix, who has been a die hard Patriots fan since 2001 and seen them win 6 Super Bowls, wouldn't be so insecure, but alas here were are.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by Amnorix

It's not about that. It's about refuting the bullshit effort of idiots to pretend that the Patriots dynasty is somehow illegitimate for reasons that make no sense.



Whether the dynasty continues or not isn't actually all that relevant.

Nobody said it wasn’t legit. The formula is fair. Not much the Patriots can do to alter who they play and how well the other teams in the division compete from year to year.

They’ve still had an easy road. And I don’t buy for a single second that the Bills are a tough opponent. Neither should you.

[Reerun_KC]

KC is about to be Back To Back To Back participation trophy winners.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by Amnorix

This whole thread has gone weird.

First, I'm not insecure. I'm pointing out that a point of view that many took here a month or two ago appears incorrect. Not sure why that's insecure.

Second, whenever the Patriots come up around here it's "Cheatriots", "refs" and "weak-ass AFC East". It's nonsense, and I'm pointing out that it's nonsense.

Dont' paint me with the same brush as the Pats fans who have joined in the last year or whatever. I'd like to think that nearly two decades on here bought me a little more credibility than that, but I guess not.

Thought this was a football site. People said football stuff a while back. I argued then and nobody wanted to listen. Now that there is more proof that they were wrong, I'm bringing it up again. Why that's "insecure" or "being a dick" I'm not sure. Maybe some just don't like being proven wrong.

For years you’ve successfully ignored or laughed off all of the insults and accusations that get thrown at the Patriots on this forum. Why is now any different?

Hell, you had to sit through non-stop criticism of Pioli and Cassel and whatever other minions they brought with them. How were you so easy going back then?

[BlackOp]

Damn...two bogus tripping calls sent this D-bag into damage control.

Guilt has a strange way of expressing itself....

Dont worry....last night's rig-job isn't even in the Patriots top 10 most bogus wins.

[RedRaider56]

Originally Posted by Amnorix

So it looks like the AFC East – which everyone one here was trying to convince me was the worst division that ever even thought about putting on cleats -- is not in fact so incredibly god-awful compared to some divisions ....like the AFC West for example. Let's look at the actual results from the non-Pats/Chiefs teams in the AFC East/West.

The only AFCW/AFCE game remaining this year is Pats/Chiefs. In the other three games, the AFC East won the head to head matchups 2-1. All three games were blowouts. The Chargers wiped out the Dolphins, while the Jets spanked the Raiders and the Bills strangled the Broncos. Combined score doesn’t look good for the West. The East scored a combined total of 64 points to the West’s 36.

In fact, it seems reasonably clear that the third best team in the combined AFCE/W (if you assume Pats/Chiefs are 1st and 2nd in what order you like), is the Bills.

The Chargers moved to Cleveland? Who knew?