Thread: Chiefs Gronk or Kelce
View Single Post
Old 10-19-2019, 08:11 AM   #41
oldman oldman is offline
Curmudgeon
 
oldman's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North by Northwest
Casino cash: $5836784
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefshrink View Post
It's a wash at this point.

Gronk a better blocker.
Gronk had better consistent hands.
Kelce more athletic
Kelce better speed
Kelce runs better routes

Both are gamers in the red zone with Gronk having the slight edge only because TB was throwing to him and Kelce had Smith BUT things have changed in KC

Maybe when it is all said and done for Kelce, PM2 will have vaulted Kelce above Gronk and make it into the HOF with better stats.
I agree with most of this. The only thing I disagree on is that Kelce will move ahead of Gronk. The reason is he won't have PMII his entire career. If I have to choose, it's Kelce, hands down.
As to the question is Kelce better than Gonzalez? Take a look at who was throwing to TG in his 1st 4 years and his last 2 in KC. Even if his was a dick to KC fans, you have to admit his stats are pretty impressive. But I still go with Kelce.
Posts: 5,319
oldman is too fat/Omaha.oldman is too fat/Omaha.oldman is too fat/Omaha.oldman is too fat/Omaha.oldman is too fat/Omaha.oldman is too fat/Omaha.oldman is too fat/Omaha.oldman is too fat/Omaha.oldman is too fat/Omaha.oldman is too fat/Omaha.oldman is too fat/Omaha.
    Reply With Quote