Quote:
Originally Posted by SithCeNtZ
Another weird deal. It's not a bad move in a vacuum, but like the Hampson deal it doesn't really work with the roster. Do we really need another 2b/utility guy? I don't get what the upside is here unless you commit to playing him all the time and hope to flip at the deadline, which we shouldn't be doing.
|
We like half measures. We have no money so we would rather sign 3 shitty guys for as much as one good guy would cost.