Quote:
Originally Posted by Buehler445
What am I missing?
If Disney has half the risk, I’d take that to mean half the expense. If they have half the expense and get half of the revenue, the margin would be better than giving away 5% of the net.
Meaning that if it made money Sony would get less. If it lost money Sony would lose less. It wouldn’t take a profitable movie and make it unprofitable.
50% income - 50% expense = net
Vs
100% income - 100% expense = net -5%
So what am I missing?
|
Bear in mind Disney is still making 100% of profits off of merchandising. So this is about Disney being greedy.