Quote:
Originally Posted by BWillie
That is terrible. That makes me lean more towards that he may have done it. Even if he did do it, it's almost a certainty that evidence was planted.
|
I am open to the idea that he did it. However, I am not open to the idea that the state had enough of a case to convict him.
Maybe someone can help me here. It seems awfully weird that the same judge that presided over the original trial also resides over the appeals as well. That seems like a conflict of interest. It also happened in the West Memphis Three trials and appeals. It just seems like a reeruned policy.