Quote:
Originally Posted by frankotank
the key having no other dna on it other than averys...wow.
I think he could be guilty.... he could be. he could have done it. but...from what I've seen, if I was on the jury I'd have to say I have reasonable doubt, so I'd have to vote not guilty. how in the **** any of those jurors could sit there and honestly say they have no doubt is just beyond me! they didn't know of Avery's previous involvement with the victim....so what...there was enough evidence to provide doubt.
but whether he did it or not....the simple fact that those suspect cops who where DIRECTLY involved in his first conviction (and ALMOST inarguably RAILROADED his ass!!!!) were super ****ing DUPER directly involved in the next one.....that should be grounds for dismissal of these charges! THE END. that they were involved AT ALL you'd think would be grounds for dismissal.....that they were involved to such an extent that THEY found the key 4 months after the first search....that the tampered with blood vial came from them with Lenks name on the transfer form.....just wow. unbelievable.
|
Never been on a jury before?