Quote:
Originally Posted by eDave
I've been struggling all day trying to figure this out. What did Kim accomplish there. A duplicate helps Jimmy how.
/feeling stoopid.
|
I'm just curious how Chuck thinks it would be admissible. I don't know what the evidentiary thresholds for a Bar hearing would be but if there's anything at all, this is a clear "prejudicial impact outweighs probative value" issue. The substance of that tape has NOTHING to do with Jimmy's bar complaint. It's completely outside of the scope of the inquiry.
There's no way that tape should get played. And I think Chuck protected the original for chain of custody issues but as has been noted, it implies malice aforethought and pre-planning. Now how that all ties together with the photographs Mike took is completely beyond me.