|
Look at his review of Matt Barkley, who is widely considered the #2 Prospect behind Geno. His review is glowing in comparison to Geno. The majority of it is positive. There are even built in excuses for Barkley (poor offensive line etc) yet no mention of Geno's shittastic O-Line and Defense and lack of a running game.
WVU had Austin, Baily and Geno. THAT'S IT. Yet he wants to single out the K-state game as the moment of truth for Geno and makes no note of the awful play of his defense.
But Barkley gets a built in excuse?
That is bullshit and it's biased
Here is the funniest thing:
What's Barkley's #1 question mark?
His Arm strength, right?
It's not even mentioned as a negative for Barkley.
And we're suppose to take this guys seriously? It REEKS of favoritism.
It's awful. Geno gets a laundry list of negatives, Barkely, the #2 Prospect gets a few sentences.
Yeah...i smell some favoritism and some Bullshit here.
The guy clearly has some ulterior motives. I'm not going to pretend i know what those motives are, but it's pretty ****ing blatant when you compare the reports side by side.
|