Quote:
Originally Posted by Lzen
You totally missed my point. I don't know how as I thought I had explained it pretty well, but let me try again.
I didn't say I had stats, I asked if anyone could provide something on this: I would like to know how many dog bites per year there are in this country overall. And then you could break them down into breeds. My point is that smaller dogs bite, as well. All dogs breeds bite. It's just that the samller and medium ones just don't get labeled murderers because they aren't capable of doing the damage that a pit can when it bites/attacks. And even if we have some stats on total dog bites, I wonder if it is even complete due to the fact that most likely small and medium dog bites are probably not reported. Can you see how this makes it seem more that pits are more dangerous. More pits plus the most force in a bite equals more maulings by pits. It does not necessarily mean that a pitbull temperament is worse than other breeds.
|
Little dogs can be some little shits, but they don't get labeled murderers because nobody ****ing dies ... or even gets hospitalized. They get a ****ing bandaid. I wonder why nobody reports them.
The statistics make it seem like pits are more dangerous because pits are more dangerous.