Quote:
Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88
You seriously can't see the difference in developing a second year QB who had barely taken an NFL snap (which is what Aaron Rodgers was when McCarthy arrived in Green Bay in 2006), versus coaching a 12 year established NFL veteran/future HOF QB (which is what Manning was when Gase coached him in Denver).
You seriously can't differentiate between those two situations?
Also you criticizing McCarthy for "only" winning one Super Bowl with Aaron Rodgers is funny considering Denver won zero Super Bowls with Manning in Denver when Gase was the OC.
In fact the one Super Bowl appearance Denver/Manning did have with Gase as OC was when their offense was humiliated by Seattle, only scoring 8 points in garbage time. Talk about "underachieving" as an offense.
|
No, I can see the difference, but that doesn’t change the fact that Rodgers was there for 1 year without McCarthy and sat behind Favre. We’ve all seen what that one year can do with a generational talent.
The truth is, we have no ****ing clue how much of a role McCarthy played in that, just like Gase. I do know one thing, one got a ton of credit for their work, while the other was let go and treated like they did nothing but hold them back. As much as you want to pretend this distinction means nothing in this conversation it does.
You want me to technically give McCarthy some credit for developing Rodgers? Fine, but I’m not going to sit here and pretend Rodgers wasn’t going to be Rodgers with or without Mike ****ing McCarthy, just like Manning with Gase.
Also, so Gase gets
none of the credit and
all of the blame for what happens with Manning? Got it.