Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaVirus
It is. And I want to note that I dropped an “lol” in my original post hoping to soften my tone. As I mentioned, sometimes you’ve just gotta pay guys, positional value be damned, and figure the rest out as you go..
It’s just funny commentary on team building philosophy.
… and I won’t lie and say that I wouldn’t feel a lot more comfortable if our largest cap hits were going to LT, CB, etc. instead. After all, it is generally much easier to find a serviceable RG than a LT.
I’m also preemptively grieving this whole Trey Smith contract. I really hope I’m proven wrong but this is just not how I would have handled this thing.
|
As some have pointed out (fairly) -- we do seem to have our WR position pretty well locked down for the next couple years at discount rates. That allows us to reallocate a bit to positions of lesser importance. And even when those extensions kick in, you can push the money out a year fairly easily.
So you're looking at 3 years before our WR room costs any real money. By then, virtually all these deals can be excised.