Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26
Nah sounds like it was after they were already sitting at 23 that they looked into trading up, not at 14.
Also, didn’t they made the trade when they were on the clock and LA had already picked? And I don’t see any way they didn’t know LA was taking Slater. That was obvious.
|
The thing that doesn't make sense - if they were worried he wouldn't fall all the way to 23, why trade down to 23 to begin with? Why not take him at 14 if you couldn't get a trade that didn't move down so much?
Sounds like the Vikings aren't very good at this.