Quote:
Originally Posted by TomB
"When both were at their best, who was better?"
Answering the question as it's posed: Gronk, period.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 203Pat
Kelce is just a slow receiver and a moody bitch. Gronk is the greatest TE who ever lived.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCasual
There is no comparison, Gronk is one of if not the best blocking TE in the history of the NFL. He is also one of the best receiving TE's in the history of the NFL. Kelce doesn't even crack the top 5 in NFL history. Try to stay objective, Kelce is not in Gronks class, sorry. Dude got embarrassed in last year's AFC championship game and you want to put him on Gronks level in his prime....lol
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare
Gronk, and I hate saying that but he had more reliable hands, didn't have that mental lapse and drop a routine catch like Travis does.
Rob was a better blocker too
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyecopeland
Gronk was a better blocker
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrookedTrump
No offense but only on a Chiefs message board would this be asked. Who is better at thier best? Gronk when healthy was arguably the biggest mismatch in NFL history. His clutch big performances (including playoffs and SBs) are legendary. His blocking was as good if not better as most offensive lineman. His catch radius was as big as it gets - and once he caught it good luck tackling him.
His only downfall was the injuries, Kelce has him on that.
|
__________________
"Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour" Peter 5:8
"Surely your turning of things upside down shall be esteemed as the potter's clay" Isaiah 29:16
"Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me." Revelation 3:20
|