Quote:
Originally Posted by Megatron96
As TEs they were pretty close. Gronk had really good hands, and his size and speed made him unstoppable 99% of the time.
Kelce is a slightly smaller version of Gronk. Maybe even faster. Not as good a blocker though.
But Kelce has been far more available, and IMO that makes him the better TE.
It doesn't really matter how great a player is if they can't be relied on to play week in and week out.
|
I pretty much agree with all of this. I think the answer is that if you are guaranteed to have either of them at their peak, and only need them for a "winner take all game", or a season, I'll take Gronk without a doubt. And that's actually over ALL TEs ever!
If you're talking about drafting them, or being subject to the vagaries of their health, then it's Tony G. for all time, and if forced to choose between just Gronk/Kelce, it's definitely a serious consideration to go Kelce.