Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26
That might’ve been the extremely rare draft that taking a RB #1 would be defensible.
And you could still argue we’d be better off with Fisher who’s a good LT. We would’ve had to overpay to keep a RB had we drafted one and he’d probably already be breaking down, while Fisher is entering his prime and protecting our franchise QB’s blindside.
|
Stop making this into a science question. Barkley is way better than Fisher could ever hope to be. Period.
The notion that you 'have' or 'can never' draft a certain position is what leads to draft busts. There are so many variables to that question there is really no absolute answer like some of you all want to make it out to be. It is also why most of you on here would suck at being a GM.